Chief Counsel Advice 201411029 Released March 14, 2014 Advice

Refund limited by section 6511 two-year lookback

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2014
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel concluded that a refund was limited to two restricted interest payments made during the two-year lookback period before the refund claim was filed. The advice relied on cases holding that the phrase “the taxpayer” in IRC § 6511(a) refers to taxpayers generally, not only to the particular claimant. Refund of the remaining amount was barred by the statute of limitations, although unpaid assessed tax could be abated.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: How much of a refund claim was timely under IRC § 6511(a)?
  • Outcome: Advice given, refund limited to the two-year lookback amount
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6511(a); Little People's School, Inc. v. United States, 842 F.2d 570 (1st Cir. 1988); Wachovia Bank, N.A. v. United States, 455 F.3d 1261 (11th Cir. 2006)

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA-325903-13
Office: ----------
UILC: 6511.00-00
Number: 201411029
Release Date: 3/14/2014
From: -------------------------
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 9:03 AM
To: -------------------
Cc: --------------------
Subject: Response to RE: Request for Guidance on 6511(a) -- --------------------------------


We have reviewed the information provided and the relevant controlling law
and conclude that the refund is limited to the sum of the two restricted
interest payments made during the two year lookback period from the date the
claim for refund (amended return) was filed. In Little People's School, Inc.
v. United States, 842 F.2d 570 (1st Cir. 1988), and Wachovia Bank, N.A. v.
United States, 455 F.3d 1261 (11th Cir. 2006) (the circuit to which appeal in
this case would lie), taxpayer's attempted to make the same argument that the
estate relies on here, namely that I.R.C. section 6511(a) does not restrict
their refund because they were not "required to be filed". In each case, the
Appellate court held that the reference to "taxpayer" in the clause "in
respect of which tax the taxpayer is required to file a return" was a
reference to taxpayers generally, not to a particular taxpayer. In other
words "the taxpayer" is not a reference to a specific refund claimant only,
but to taxpayers generally.

The total refund due is the $-----. Refund of the rest is barred by the
statute of limitations. The unpaid assessed tax can and should be abated -
but the amount already remitted cannot be refunded by virtue of I.R.C.
section 6511(a).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2014, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.