Refund limited by section 6511 two-year lookback
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel concluded that a refund was limited to two restricted interest payments made during the two-year lookback period before the refund claim was filed. The advice relied on cases holding that the phrase “the taxpayer” in IRC § 6511(a) refers to taxpayers generally, not only to the particular claimant. Refund of the remaining amount was barred by the statute of limitations, although unpaid assessed tax could be abated.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: How much of a refund claim was timely under IRC § 6511(a)?
- Outcome: Advice given, refund limited to the two-year lookback amount
- Key authorities: IRC § 6511(a); Little People's School, Inc. v. United States, 842 F.2d 570 (1st Cir. 1988); Wachovia Bank, N.A. v. United States, 455 F.3d 1261 (11th Cir. 2006)
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA-325903-13
Office: ----------
UILC: 6511.00-00
Number: 201411029
Release Date: 3/14/2014
From: -------------------------
Sent: Monday, March 25, 2013 9:03 AM
To: -------------------
Cc: --------------------
Subject: Response to RE: Request for Guidance on 6511(a) -- --------------------------------
We have reviewed the information provided and the relevant controlling law and conclude that the refund is limited to the sum of the two restricted interest payments made during the two year lookback period from the date the claim for refund (amended return) was filed. In Little People's School, Inc. v. United States, 842 F.2d 570 (1st Cir. 1988), and Wachovia Bank, N.A. v. United States, 455 F.3d 1261 (11th Cir. 2006) (the circuit to which appeal in this case would lie), taxpayer's attempted to make the same argument that the estate relies on here, namely that I.R.C. section 6511(a) does not restrict their refund because they were not "required to be filed". In each case, the Appellate court held that the reference to "taxpayer" in the clause "in respect of which tax the taxpayer is required to file a return" was a reference to taxpayers generally, not to a particular taxpayer. In other words "the taxpayer" is not a reference to a specific refund claimant only, but to taxpayers generally.
The total refund due is the $-----. Refund of the rest is barred by the statute of limitations. The unpaid assessed tax can and should be abated - but the amount already remitted cannot be refunded by virtue of I.R.C. section 6511(a).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace