IRS waives a 60-day SEP-IRA rollover deadline after bank delay
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An IRA owner withdrew money from a SEP-IRA to help purchase a home and intended to replace it using a home equity loan. The bank delayed releasing the loan proceeds because it required an original power of attorney, and the SEP-IRA received the replacement funds after the 60-day period. The IRS waived the deadline because the delay resulted from the bank's failure to transfer the funds promptly. The ruling did not authorize rollovers of amounts required to be distributed under section 408(a)(6).
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Can the taxpayer's late SEP-IRA contribution qualify as a rollover after the bank delayed the funds?
- Outcome: Approved, the 60-day requirement was waived.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 72, 401, 408, and 6110; Rev. Proc. 2003-16
Full text (IRS public release)
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
NOV 20 2013
[illegible handwritten notation]
Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00
Legend:
Taxpayer A =
SEP-IRA X =
Company F =
Amount M =
Bank P =
Amount N =
Dear
This is in response to a letter dated September 4, 2012, supplemented by a letter dated
July 23, 2013, submitted on your behalf by your authorized representative, in which you
request a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code (Code).
The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in
support of the ruling requested.
Taxpayer A represents that he received a distribution of Amount M from SEP-IRA X.
Taxpayer A asserts that his failure to complete a rollover of Amount M within the 60-
day period prescribed by section 408(d)(3) of the Code was due to the failure of Bank P
to timely transfer the funds as requested by Taxpayer A.
201407029
2
Taxpayer A’s need for a distribution from SEP-IRA X was precipitated by a divorce.
Taxpayer A’s spouse was to keep the family home and Taxpayer A was to receive his
share of equity in their home. Taxpayer A wished to purchase a nearby house, but was
unable to qualify for standard financing due to the existing mortgage on the marital
home. Therefore, Taxpayer A withdrew Amount M from SEP-IRA X for the purpose of
purchasing the new home jointly with his father. Taxpayer A used Amount M as part of
a cash purchase, with the intent of obtaining a home equity line of credit from Bank P to
effect a rollover back to SEP-IRA X. On May 11, 2011, a wire transfer of Amount M
from SEP-IRA X was transferred to Taxpayer A’s checking account. On May 13, 2011,
Taxpayer A closed on the new home, and he initiated the application for the home
equity line of credit three days later. However, completion of the transaction required
removing Taxpayer A’s name from the mortgage on his former home. Taxpayer A’s
former spouse was not able to close on her refinancing until June 23, 2011, at which
time Taxpayer A made renewed efforts to complete the home equity loan, which
required the participation of his father. Unfortunately Taxpayer A’s father became
severely ill and was unable to attend the closing on the home equity loan in person.
Taxpayer A’s father had an attorney prepare a power of attorney in order to have
Taxpayer A close the transaction on his behalf. The power of attorney was faxed to
Bank P and the transaction closed on July 6, 2011. However, Bank P required an
original of the power of attorney before disbursing funds from the equity line of credit.
Taxpayer A provided the original power of attorney to Bank P, but Bank P did not
release the funds until July 11, 2011. On that same day Taxpayer A mailed Company F
the check for Amount N. Company F did not redeposit Amount M into SEP-IRA X until
July 15, 2011.
Based on the facts and representations, you request a ruling that the Internal Revenue
Service (Service) waive the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution
of Amount M from SEP-IRA X.
Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in section
408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in gross income
by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner provided under section
72 of the Code.
Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines, and provides the rules applicable to IRA
rollovers.
Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) of the Code does not
apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for whose benefit
the IRA is maintained if --
(i) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid into an
IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the day on which
the individual receives the payment or distribution; or
201407029
3
(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid into an
eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such individual not later
than the 60th day after the date on which the payment or distribution is received, except
that the maximum amount which may be paid into such plan may not exceed the portion
of the amount received which is includible in gross income (determined without regard
to section 408(d)(3)).
Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not
apply to any amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual from
an IRA if at any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such receipt such
individual received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) from an IRA
which was not includible in gross income because of the application of section
408(d)(3).
Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for partial
rollovers.
Section 408(d)(3)(E) of the Code provides that the rollover provisions of section 408(d)
do not apply to any amount required to be distributed under section 408(a)(6).
Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive the 60-day
requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code where the failure
to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including
casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual
subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001,
are eligible for the waiver under section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code.
Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359 (January 27, 2003) provides that in determining
whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to section
408(d)(3)(I), the Service will consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including: (1)
errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to complete a rollover due to
death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country
or postal error, (3) the use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of
payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the
distribution occurred.
The information presented and documentation submitted by Taxpayer A is consistent
with his assertion that his failure to accomplish a timely rollover of Amount M was due to
Bank P’s failure to timely transfer the funds as requested by Taxpayer A.
Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service hereby waives the
60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount M from SEP-IRA
X. Provided all other requirements of Code section 408(d)(3), except the 60-day
requirement were met with respect to the rollover contribution of Amount M to SEP-IRA
X on July 15, 2011, will be considered a rollover contribution within the meaning of
section 408(d)(3) of the Code.
201407029
4
No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein
under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations, which may
be applicable thereto.
Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter ruling is being
sent to your authorized representative.
If you have any questions, please contact
Please address all correspondence to
SE:T:EP:RA:T3.
Sincerely yours,
Laura B. Warshawsky, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 3
Enclosures:
Deleted Copy of Ruling Letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2014, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.