IRS waives the 60-day rollover requirement for employee plan stock

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer received shares from an employee plan after a stockbroker mistakenly arranged for a stock distribution instead of the intended rollover. The taxpayer later learned that the transaction did not qualify for the expected net unrealized appreciation treatment and sought relief. The IRS waived the 60-day rollover requirement under § 402(c)(3)(B) and allowed the shares to be contributed to a rollover IRA within 60 days of the ruling, subject to the other statutory requirements.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: May the taxpayer receive a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement for the distributed employee plan stock?
• Outcome: Approved, subject to the stated rollover conditions.
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 402(c), 402(c)(3)(A), 402(c)(3)(B), and 401(a)(9); Treas. Reg. § 1.401(a)(31)-1; Rev. Proc. 2003-16.

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

201405030
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

Uniform Issue List: 402.00-00

• SE:T:EP:RA:T3

xke

NOV 05 2013

Legend:
Taxpayer A: ***
Individual L: ***
***
Financial Institution U: ***
Financial Institution J: ***
Amount C: ***
Plan Y: ***

Dear ***:

This is in response to your request dated May 31, 2013 as supplemented by
correspondence dated September 18, 2013, in which you request a waiver of the 60-
day rollover requirement contained in section 402(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code
(Code).

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in
support of the ruling requested.

Taxpayer A represents that she received a distribution from Plan Y of 1,037 shares of
Financial Institution J stock. Taxpayer A asserts that her failure to accomplish a rollover
within the 60-day period prescribed by section 402(c)(3) was due to Individual L giving
incorrect advice for Taxpayer A’s situation. Taxpayer A further represents that the 1,037
shares of Financial Institution stock remain in her investment account with Financial
Institution U.

On November 29, 2012, Taxpayer A’s stockbroker, Individual L, and Taxpayer A
discussed the rollover of Taxpayer A’s investment in Plan Y of Financial Institution J,

Page 2
201405030

her former employer's retirement plan. A portion of Taxpayer A’s investment in Plan Y
was in a Financial Institution J stock fund which Taxpayer A wanted to maintain.
Individual L told Taxpayer A that she could do a Net Unrealized Appreciation (NUA)
transaction which would result in tax savings and allow her to maintain the investment.
Taxpayer A and Individual L mistakenly believed that the stock fund investment was
actual shares of stock.

Also on November 29, 2012, Taxpayer A and Individual L called Financial Institution J to
request a rollover from Plan Y. Individual L told Financial Institution J that Taxpayer A
wanted her investment in the Financial Institution J stock fund to be distributed as stock,
rather than rolled over. Financial Institution J managed the Financial Institution J stock
fund and would only allow a distribution from this fund to be in cash or converted into
Financial Institution J stock. On December 3, 2012, Taxpayer A’s investment in the
Financial Institution J stock fund was converted into 1,037 shares of Financial Institution
J stock and were electronically transferred to Financial Institution U and deposited in
Taxpayer A’s regular brokerage account. On December 4, 2012, Taxpayer A received a
check for Amount C, the funds in her Plan Y account, less the value of the 1,037 shares
of the Financial Institution J stock. Taxpayer A deposited Amount C into her IRA on
December 4, 2012.

When Taxpayer A received her 2012 Form 1099-R, the taxable amount was
dramatically different from what she had anticipated. Taxpayer A’s tax preparer and
Individual L discussed the NUA transaction and realized that it required the investment
in the Financial Institution J stock fund be in shares of Financial Institution J stock prior
to the distribution from Plan Y. Individual L had mistakenly arranged for the distribution
on behalf of Taxpayer A.

Based on the facts and representations, you request a ruling that the Internal Revenue
Service (Service) waive the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 402(c)(3)
of the Code with respect to the distribution of the 1,037 shares of Financial Institution J
stock.

Section 402(c) of the Code provides that if any portion of the balance to the credit of an
employee in a qualified trust is paid to the employee in an eligible rollover distribution,
and the distributee transfers any portion of the property received in such distribution to
an eligible retirement plan, and in the case of a distribution of property other than
money, the amount so transferred consists of the property distributed, then such
distribution (to the extent transferred) shall not be includible in gross income for the
taxable year in which paid. Section 402(c)(3)(A) states that such rollover must be
accomplished within 60 days following the day on which the distributee received the
property. An individual retirement account constitutes one form of eligible retirement
plan.

Section 402(c)(4) of the Code provides that an eligible rollover distribution shall not
include any distribution to the extent such distribution is required under section
401(a)(9).

Page 3
201405030

Section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code provides, in relevant part, that the Secretary may
waive the 60-day requirement under section 402(c) where the failure to waive such
requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including casualty, disaster, or
other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual subject to such
requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001, are eligible for
the waiver under section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code.

Section 401(a)(31) of the Code provides the rules for governing “direct transfers of
eligible rollover distributions”.

Section 1.401(a)(31)-1 of the Income Tax Regulations, Question and Answer-15,
provides, in relevant part, that an eligible rollover distribution that is paid to an eligible
retirement plan in a direct rollover is a distribution and rollover, and not a transfer of
assets and liabilities.

Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359, (January 27, 2003), provides that in determining
whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to section
402(c)(3) of the Code, the Service will consider all relevant facts and circumstances,
including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to complete a
rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions imposed by a
foreign country or postal error, (3) the use of the amount distributed (for example, in the
case of payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed
since the distribution occurred.

The information presented and documentation submitted by Taxpayer A is consistent
with her assertion that her failure to accomplish a timely rollover was caused by the fact
that Individual L mistakenly arranged for a distribution of stocks rather than a rollover.

Therefore, pursuant to section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code, the Service hereby waives the
60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of the 1,037 shares of
Financial Institution J stock. Taxpayer A is granted a period of 60 days from the
issuance of this ruling letter to contribute the 1,037 shares of Financial Institution J stock
to a Rollover IRA. Provided all other requirements of section 402(c)(3) of the Code,
except the 60-day requirement, are met with respect to such contribution, the
contribution of 1,037 shares of Financial Institution J stock to a Rollover IRA will be
considered a rollover contribution within the meaning of section 402(c)(3) of the Code.

This ruling does not authorize the rollover of amounts that are required to be distributed
by section 401(a)(9) of the Code.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein
under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which may be
applicable thereto.

Page 4
201405030

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact * * * (ID * * ) at * * . Please
address all correspondence to SE:T:EP:RA:T3.

Sincerely yours,

Laura B. Warshawsky, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 3

Enclosures:
Deleted Copy of Ruling Letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose