Chief Counsel Advice 201402011 Released January 10, 2014 Advice

Assessment period for partnership-loss carryforward adjustments

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2014
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Chief Counsel advice states that a carryforward amount from a partnership adjustment is a computational affected item. It concludes that when the Tax Matters Partner signs Form 872-P, the partner extends the minimum assessment period for tax attributable to a disallowed partnership loss. The extension applies regardless of which partner return claimed the loss and includes carryforward years, because the form does not limit the extension to the partnership year in which the loss arose.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does a Form 872-P signed by the Tax Matters Partner extend assessment periods for partner returns claiming a carried-forward partnership loss?
  • Outcome: Advice given
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6229; Olsen v. U.S., 172 F.3d 1311 (Fed. Cir. 1999); Cummings v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 1996-282; Bob Hambric Chevrolet v. U.S., 849 F. Supp. 500 (WD Tex. 1994)

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2013112209201201 Third Party Communication: None

UILC: 6229.02-00 Date of Communication: Not Applicable

Number: 201402011
Release Date: 1/10/2014
From:
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 9:20:13 AM
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: RE: TEFRA question

The carryforward amount of any adjustment is a computational
affected item under Olsen v. U.S., 172 F.3d 1311 (Fed. Cir. 1999);
Cummings v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 1996-282; Bob Hambric
Chevrolet v. U.S., 849 F. Supp. 500 (WD Tex. 1994).

When the TMP signs a Form 872-P, he extends the minimum period for
assessment any tax attributable to a disallowed partnership loss,
regardless of which return a partner claimed that loss on. So when he
extends the period for assessing tax “attributable to” a partnership
loss for partnership year 1, he is extending the assessment period for
all partner returns claiming that loss including carryforward years.
There is nothing in the Form 872-P that limits the assessment to a
partner return for year 1.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2014, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.