Chief Counsel Advice 201402009 Released January 10, 2014 Advice

Partnership assessment periods and FPAAs

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2014
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Chief Counsel advice states that the IRS may issue an FPAA if a partner's section 6501 assessment period remains open. If the period is open because of Form 872, the form must specifically reference partnership items as required by section 6229(b)(3). The advice explains that section 6229 extends, but does not shorten, each partner's section 6501 period. It concludes that an FPAA may bind a partner whose assessment period remains open for partnership items.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: When may the IRS issue an FPAA based on an open assessment period for partnership items?
  • Outcome: Advice given
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 6501(a), 6501(n), 6229(a), 6229(b)(3), and 6226(d)(1)(A); Bufferd v. Commissioner, 506 U.S. 523, 527 (1993); Rhone-Poulenc Surfactants & Specialties, L.P. v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. 533, 542-43 (2000); Curr-Spec Partners, L.P. v. Commissioner, 579 F.3d 391, 396-97 (5th Cir. 2009); AD Global Fund, LLC v. United States, 481 F.3d 1351, 1354-55 (Fed. Cir. 2007); Andantech L.L.C. v. Commissioner, 331 F.3d 972, 976-77 (D.C. Cir. 2003)

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2013082911411701 Third Party Communication: None

UILC: 6229.00-00 Date of Communication: Not Applicable

Number: 201402009
Release Date: 1/10/2014
From:
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 11:41:18 AM
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: RE: Another grounds for disallowance on -------------------------

We can issue an FPAA if any partner’s section 6501 statute is open. If it is
open due to a Form 872, the Form 872 must specifically reference
partnership items as required by section 6229(b)(3). Since about 2008,
the standard Form 872 contains such language. This issue is addressed in
the attached Chief Counsel Notice on page 10.

In short, section 6501(a) provides the period of limitations for assessing
any tax imposed by Title 26 of the United States Code, including tax
attributable to partnership and affected items. See Bufferd v.
Commissioner, 506 U.S. 523, 527 (1993). This period runs from the filing
date of an actual tax return rather than from the filing date of a pass-
through entity information return [such as a partnership return]. Id. As
referenced in section 6501(n), section 6229 merely extends each partner's
section 6501 period. Section 6229(a) provides that each partner’s section
6501 assessment period for tax attributable to partnership and affected
items shall not expire before the date that is three years after the later of
the date on which the partnership return for the taxable year was filed, or
the last day for filing the return for that year (determined without regard to
extensions). Rhone-Poulenc Surfactants & Specialties, L.P. v.
Commissioner, 114 T.C. 533, 542-43 (2000); Curr-Spec Partners, L.P. v.
Commissioner, 579 F.3d 391, 396-97 (5th Cir. 2009); AD Global Fund, LLC
v. United States, 481 F.3d 1351, 1354-55 (Fed. Cir. 2007); Andantech
L.L.C. v. Commissioner, 331 F.3d 972, 976-77 (D.C. Cir. 2003). Thus,
section 6229 operates only to extend a partner’s section 6501 period. Id. It
does not shorten the partners' otherwise applicable period for assessment.

So if any partner’s section 6501 period is open for partnership items, we
may issue an FPAA that is binding on that partner. I.R.C. 6226(d)(1)(A).

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2014, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.