Competing extended carryback elections

Number
201402008
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Refund to Certain Fiduciaries of Insolvent Members of Affiliated Groups
Code sections
§ 6402
Ruling dated
August 8, 2013
Publicly released
January 10, 2014

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2014, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2014
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Chief Counsel advice considers competing carryback elections for consolidated-group net operating losses. One taxpayer requested a two-year carryback for one year, while a fiduciary and the common parent each made five-year extended carryback elections for different years. The advice states that only one of the competing elections for the first year could be accepted and that the IRS could use its discretion under the cited regulation to accept the common parent's filings and reject the fiduciary's initial election.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the IRS accept the common parent's carryback filings and reject the fiduciary's competing extended carryback election?
  • Outcome: Advice given
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6402; Treas. Reg. § 301.6402-7(f)

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2013080813454917 [Third Party Communication:

UILC: 6402.03-02 Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]

Number: 201402008
Release Date: 1/10/2014
From: ---------------
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2013 1:45:49 PM
To: ---------------------------------------------
Cc: ----------------------------------------------
Bcc:
Subject: Advice

For the Year 1 tax year, CP, the common parent of a consolidated group, filed a tentative refund request based on a two-year carryback of the CNOLs of the group for that year. Fiduciary made a five-year extended carryback election for those same losses. The Service Center issued a tentative refund to CP with respect to its request.

For the Year 2 tax year, CP made a five-year extended carryback election for the CNOLs of the group for that year. Fiduciary filed a document attempting to “reverse” its previous five-year extended carryback election for Year 1 and elect a five-year extended carryback for the Year 2 tax year as well.

Both Fiduciary’s five-year extended carryback election for Year 1 and CP’s five-year extended carryback election for Year 2 were timely, but only one can be accepted. Fiduciary has executed a Form 870 agreeing to its initial five-year extended carryback election for Year 1, but the Service has not executed the Form 870 and the agreement is pending --------------------------------.

The field has asked whether the Service can exercise its broad discretion under § 301.6402-7(f) to accept the filings by CP (request for a two-year carryback of the CNOLs of the group for the Year 1 tax year and the five-year extended carryback election of the CNOLs of the group for the Year 2 tax year) and not accept the filings by Fiduciary (its initial five-year extended carryback election of the CNOLs of the group for the Year 1 tax year). We advise that the Service may do so.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace