PLR 1352005: IRS grants extra time to elect an extended net operating loss carryback
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The IRS granted a consolidated corporate group 60 days to make a late election extending the carryback period for a consolidated net operating loss. The group missed the election deadline after relying on a qualified tax professional who did not make the election or advise the group to make it. The IRS found that the group acted reasonably and in good faith and that granting relief would not prejudice the government. The extension was conditioned on the group otherwise qualifying for the election and on its aggregate tax liability not being lower than it would have been if the election had been timely made.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Can a consolidated group receive extra time to make an election for an extended net operating loss carryback?
- Outcome: Approved, with a 60-day extension and the conditions stated in the ruling.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 56, 172, 1502, 6511, and 6662; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1502-21 and 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3; Rev. Proc. 2009-52
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201352005 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 12/27/2013 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 1502.21-00 Person To Contact:
----------------------------, ID No. --------------
----------------- -----------------
Telephone Number:
-------------------------------------------- ----------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:CORP:B04
PLR-115059-13
Date:
September 24, 2013
Legend
Parent = --------------------------------------------
Date 1 = --------------------
Date 2 = --------------------
Date 3 = ------------------------
X = --
Company Official = -----------------
Tax Professional = -----------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------
PLR-115059-13 2
Dear ------------:
This letter responds to a letter dated March 18, 2013, submitted on behalf of
Parent, requesting an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and
Administration Regulations to file an election. In particular, Parent is requesting an
extension of time for the consolidated group of which Parent is the common parent to
elect an extended carryback period (the “Election”) for a consolidated net operating loss
(“CNOL”). The material information submitted for consideration is summarized below.
Parent is the common parent of a consolidated group (the “Parent Group”).
Parent Group incurred a CNOL in the taxable year ending Date 2 (the “Year 2 CNOL”).
Parent seeks to carry back the Year 2 CNOL X years, to its taxable year ending on
Date 1, under § 172(b)(1)(H)(i) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Parent was required to file the Election in order to carry back the Year 2 CNOL to
its taxable year ending on Date 1 and to obtain the benefit of § 56(d)(1)(A)(ii)(I). The
Election was due on Date 3, but for various reasons, a valid Election was not filed. After
the due date for the Election, it was discovered that the Election had not been filed.
Subsequently, this request was submitted, under § 301.9100-3, for an extension of time
to file the Election. Parent has represented that it is not seeking to alter a return
position for which an accuracy related penalty has been or could be imposed under
§ 6662 and for which the new position requires or permits a regulatory election for which
relief is requested.
Section 172(b)(1)(A)(i) generally permits a taxpayer to carry back a net operating
loss (“NOL”) to each of the 2 taxable years preceding the taxable year of the NOL.
Section 172(b)(1)(H)(i) permits a taxpayer to elect to carry back an applicable net
operating loss (“applicable NOL”) to each of the 3, 4, or 5 taxable years preceding the
taxable year of the applicable NOL, in lieu of the 2-year period provided by
§ 172(b)(1)(A)(i). Section 172(b)(1)(H)(ii) provides that the term “applicable NOL”
means the taxpayer’s NOL for a taxable year ending after December 31, 2007, and
beginning before January 1, 2010.
Section 172(b)(1)(H)(iii) provides that the election under § 172(b)(1)(H) shall be
made by the due date (including extension of time) for filing the return for the taxpayer’s
last taxable year beginning in 2009. The election is irrevocable and, in general, may be
made only with respect to one taxable year.
Section 1502 provides that the Secretary shall prescribe such regulations as he
may deem necessary in order that the tax liability of any affiliated group of corporations
making a consolidated return and of each corporation in the group, both during and after
PLR-115059-13 3
the period of affiliation, may be returned, determined, computed, assessed, collected,
and adjusted, in such manner as clearly to reflect the income tax liability and the various
factors necessary for the determination of such liability, and in order to prevent
avoidance of such tax liability. In carrying out the preceding sentence, the Secretary
may prescribe rules that are different from the provisions of chapter 1 that would apply if
such corporations filed separate returns.
Section 1.1502-21(b) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that losses taken
into account in determining a CNOL may be carried to other taxable years (whether
consolidated or separate) only under paragraph (b) of § 1.1502-21.
Section 1.1502-21(b)(1) provides that NOL carryovers and carrybacks to a
taxable year are determined under the principles of § 172 and § 1.1502-21.
Section 1.1502-21T(b)(3)(v)(A)(1) provides that a consolidated group may elect
an extended carryback period pursuant to § 172(b)(1)(H) with regard to a CNOL arising
in a taxable year ending after December 31, 2007, and beginning before January 1,
2010.
Rev. Proc. 2009-52, 2009-49 I.R.B. 744, provides when and how a taxpayer may
make an election under § 172(b)(1)(H). Section 4.01(2) of Rev. Proc. 2009-52 provides
that the common parent of a consolidated group makes the election for the group.
Sections 4.01(3) and 4.01(4) of Rev. Proc. 2009-52 permit the election to be made for
consolidated taxpayers by attaching a statement to the original or amended
consolidated return for the taxable year of the applicable CNOL, by attaching a
statement to the taxpayer’s amended consolidated return applying the applicable CNOL
to the carryback year, or by attaching a statement to a claim for a tentative carryback
adjustment on Form 1139, Corporation Application for Tentative Refund. Sections
4.01(3)(b) and 4.01(4)(b) of Rev. Proc. 2009-52 require the election, regardless of the
manner in which made, to be filed no later than the due date (including extensions) for
filing the return for the taxpayer’s last taxable year beginning in 2009.
Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable
extension of time to make a regulatory election or a statutory election (but no more than
six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the
Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.
Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the
Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a
regulatory election. Section 301.9100-1(a). Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will
be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting
relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Section 301.9100-3(a).
PLR-115059-13 4
The election by a consolidated group to extend the carryback period under
§ 172(b)(1)(H) for a CNOL is a regulatory election. Therefore, the Commissioner has
discretionary authority under § 301.9100-3 to grant an extension of time for Parent to
file the Election, provided Parent establishes to the satisfaction of the Commissioner
that it acted reasonably and in good faith, the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and
301.9100-3 are satisfied, and granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the
government.
Information, affidavits, and representations submitted by Parent, Company
Official, and Tax Professional explain the circumstances that resulted in the failure to
timely file a valid Election. The information establishes that Parent reasonably relied on
a qualified tax professional who failed to make, or advise Parent to make, a valid
Election. See § 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v).
Based on the facts and information submitted, including the affidavits submitted
and the representations made, we conclude that Parent has shown it acted reasonably
and in good faith, the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 are satisfied, and
granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Accordingly, provided
that, and to the extent that, the Parent Group qualifies substantively to file the Election,
we grant an extension of time under § 301.9100-3, until sixty (60) days from the date on
this letter, for Parent to file the Election. This letter does not extend the period of time
described in § 6511 by which a taxpayer is required to file a claim for credit or refund of
an overpayment of tax.
Parent may file the Election under § 172(b)(1)(H)(i) to carry back the Year 2
CNOL to its taxable year ending on Date 1 on Form 1120X, Amended U.S. Corporation
Income Tax Return, for the taxable year ending either Date 1 or Date 2, according to the
procedures set forth in Rev. Proc. 2009-52. A copy of this letter must be attached to the
Form 1120X. If Parent files Form 1120X electronically, Parent may satisfy the
requirement of attaching a copy of this letter by attaching a statement to the Parent
Group’s amended return that provides the date and control number (PLR-115059-13) of
this letter ruling.
The above extension of time is conditioned on the Parent Group’s tax liability, if
any, not being lower in the aggregate for all years to which the Election applies than it
would have been if the Election had been timely made (taking into account the time
value of money). We express no opinion as to the Parent Group’s tax liability for the
years involved. A determination thereof will be made by the Director’s office upon audit
of the income tax returns involved.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied
concerning the tax consequences of any item discussed or referenced in this letter. In
particular, we express no opinion with respect to whether Parent qualifies substantively
to make the Election. In addition, we express no opinion as to the tax effects or
PLR-115059-13 5
consequences of filing the Election late under the provisions of any other section of the
Internal Revenue Code or regulations, or as to the tax treatment of any conditions
existing at the time of, or resulting from, filing the Election late that are not specifically
set forth in this letter.
For purposes of granting relief under § 301.9100-3, we relied on certain
statements and representations made under penalty of perjury by Parent, Company
Official, and Tax Professional. The Director, however, should verify all essential facts.
In addition, notwithstanding that an extension is granted under § 301.9100-3 to file the
Election, any penalties and interest that would otherwise be applicable continue to
apply.
This letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section
6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Pursuant to the power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this letter is being
sent to your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
__________________
Ken Cohen
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.