IRS revokes an organization's exemption after failures to show exempt operations

Number
201351025
Outcome
Revocation
Document type
Determination Letter
IRS subject
Employee Benefit Organization (See Also 0501.09-00)
Code sections
§ 170, § 501(a), § 501(c)(3), § 6001, § 6020(b)(2), § 6033(a)(1), § 6104(c), § 7428
Ruling dated
May 16, 2012
Publicly released
December 20, 2013

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's determination, issued in 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2013
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS revoked an organization's recognition as exempt under IRC § 501(c)(3). The determination says the organization did not establish that it operated exclusively for exempt purposes or that its earnings did not benefit private shareholders or individuals. It also says the organization failed to respond to reasonable IRS requests to examine records concerning receipts, expenditures, and activities. The release requires Form 1120 filings and states that contributions are no longer deductible under IRC § 170.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did the organization establish that it operated exclusively for exempt purposes and maintained records supporting its exempt status?
  • Outcome: Revocation
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 170, 501(a), 501(c)(3), 6001, 6020, 6033, 6104(c), 7428

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
TE/GE: EO Examinations
1100 Commerce Street, MC 4920 DAL

Dallas, TX 75242
TAX EXEMPT AND UIL: 501.03-01
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
Release Number: 201351025
Release Date: 12/20/2013
May 16, 2012
LEGEND: Taxpayer Identification Number:

ORG = Name of Organization
ADDRESS = Address of Organization

Year = xx Identification Number:

Person to Contact:

Contact Telephone Number:

ORG
ADDRESS

CERTIFIED MAIL
Dear

This is a final adverse determination regarding your exempt status under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code). Our favorable determination letter to you dated August 6, 19xx is hereby revoked and you are no longer exempt under section 501(a) of the Code effective July 1, 20xx.

You have failed to establish that you are operated exclusively for exempt purposes within the meaning of Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(3), and that no part of your net earnings inure to the benefit of private shareholders or individuals. You failed to respond to repeated reasonable requests to allow the Internal Revenue Service to examine your records regarding your receipts, expenditures, or activities as required by I.R.C. sections 6001 and 6033(a)(1).

Contributions to your organization are no longer deductible under IRC §170. You are required to file income tax returns on Form 1120. These returns should be filed with the appropriate Service Center for the tax year ending June 30, 20xx and for all tax years thereafter

in accordance with the instructions of the return.

' Processing of income tax returns and assessments of any taxes due will not be delayed should a petition for declaratory judgment be filed under section 7428 of the Internal Revenue Code.

If you decide to contest this determination under the declaratory judgment provisions of section 7428 of the Code, a petition to the United States Tax Court, the United States Claims Court, or

the district court of the United States for the District of Columbia must be filed before the 91st Day after the date this determination was mailed to you. Please contact the clerk of the appropriate court for rules regarding filing petitions for declaratory judgments by referring to the enclosed Publication 892. You may write to these courts at the following addresses:

United States Tax Court © United States Court of Federal Claims
400 Second Street, NW 717 Madison Place, NW
Washington, D.C. 20217 Washington, D.C. 20005

United States District Court for the District of Columbia
333 Constitution Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20001

You also have the right to contact the Office of the Taxpayer Advocate. Taxpayer Advocate assistance is not a substitute for established IRS procedures, such as the formal Appeals process. The Taxpayer Advocate cannot reverse a legally correct tax determination, or extend the time fixed by law that you have to file a petition in a United States court. The Taxpayer Advocate can, however, see that a tax matter that may not have been resolved through normal channels gets prompt and proper handling. You may Call toll-free, 1-877-777-4778, and ask for Taxpayer Advocate Assistance. If you prefer, you may contact your local Taxpayer Advocate at:

Internal Revenue Service
If you have any questions, please contact the person whose name and telephone number are

shown in the heading of this letter.

Sincerely,

Nanette M. Downing
Director, EO Examinations

Enclosure:
Publication 892

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division
Exempt Organizations: Examinations

Date: January 13, 2012 Taxpayer Identification Number:
Form:
Legend:
ORG = Name of Organization Tax Year(s) Ended:

ADDRESS= Address of Organization
Person to Contact/ID Number:

ORG

Address Contact Numbers:
Telephone:
Fax:

Certified Mail — Return Receipt Requested
Dear

We have enclosed a copy of our report of examination explaining why we believe revocation of your exempt status under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) is necessary.

If you accept our findings, take no further action. We will issue a final revocation letter.

If you do not agree with our proposed revocation, you must submit to us a written request for Appeals Office consideration within 30 days from the date of this letter to protest our decision. Your protest should include a statement of the facts, the applicable law, and arguments in support of your position.

An Appeals officer will review your case. The Appeals office is independent of the Director, EO Examinations. The Appeals Office resolves most disputes informally and promptly. The enclosed Publication 3498, The Examination Process, and Publication 892, Exempt Organizations Appeal Procedures for Unagreed Issues, explain how to appeal an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) decision. Publication 3498 also includes information on your rights as a taxpayer and the IRS collection process.

You may also request that we refer this matter for technical advice as explained in Publication

  1. If we issue a determination letter to you based on technical advice, no further
    administrative appeal is available to you within the IRS regarding the issue that was the subject of the technical advice.

If we do not hear from you within 30 days from the date of this letter, we will process your case based on the recommendations shown in the report of examination. If you do not protest this proposed determination within 30 days from the date of this letter, the IRS will consider it to be a failure to exhaust your available administrative remedies. Section 7428(b)(2) of the Code provides, in part: “A declaratory judgment or decree under this section shall not be issued in any proceeding unless the Tax Court, the Claims Court, or the District Court of the United States for

Letter 3618 (Rev 11-2003)
Catalog Number 34809F

the District of Columbia determines that the organization involved has exhausted its administrative remedies within the Internal Revenue Service.” We will then issue a final revocation letter. We will also notify the appropriate state officials of the revocation in accordance with section 6104(c) of the Code.

You have the right to contact the office of the Taxpayer Advocate. Taxpayer Advocate assistance is not a substitute for established IRS procedures, such as the formal appeals process. The Taxpayer Advocate cannot reverse a legally correct tax determination, or extend the time fixed by law that you have to file a petition in a United States court. The Taxpayer Advocate can, however, see that a tax matter that may not have been resolved through normal channels gets prompt and proper handling. You may call toll-free 1-877-777-4778 and ask for Taxpayer Advocate Assistance. If you prefer, you may contact your local Taxpayer Advocate at:

Internal Revenue Service
Office of the Taxpayer Advocate

If you have any questions, please call the contact person at the telephone number shown in the heading of this letter. If you write, please provide a telephone number and the most convenient time to call if we need to contact you.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Sincerely,

Nanette M. Downing
Director, EO Examinations

Enclosures:
Publication 892
Publication 3498
Report of Examination

2 Letter 3618 (Rev 11-2003)
Catalog Number 34809F

Schedule number or exhibit

Form 886-A
(Rev. January 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS

Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended
ORG June 30, 20xx
LEGEND:

ORG = Name of Organization

Director = Name of Executive Director
Date = xx

State = Name of State

Whether ORG, Inc. is organized and operating to further tax-exempt purposes as described under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code?

Facts:

On December 6, 19xx, the organization’s Director, filed Articles of Incorporation with the State establishing ORG, Inc. The purpose of the corporation is to present multi-media performances of art in motion, through the interaction of visual and performing arts, using sculptured form, music, lighting and film; to create and present abstractions of the human body and humanizations of abstract sculptured ideas; to educate and promote public awareness of this multi-media form of art through workshops; installations, slide and video shows, seminars and discussions groups.

The corporation is organized exclusively for charitable and educational purposes, including, for such purposes, the making of distributions to organizations that qualify as exempt organizations under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. No part of the net earnings of the corporation shall inure to the benefit of, or be distributable to, its members, directors, officers, or other private persons, except that the corporation shall be authorized and empowered to pay reasonable compensation for services rendered. Upon the dissolution of the corporation, the board of directors shall, after payment of all of the liabilities of the corporation, dispose of all of the assets of the corporation to other organizations organized and operated exclusively for charitable, educational, religious or scientific purposes as described under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.

On February 19, 19xx, the Internal Revenue Service received Form 1023, Application for Recognition of Exemption Under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, from ORG, Inc. Form 1023 Part Ill states that the organization is devoted to the promotion of live performance of multi-media art in motion. The performances include kinetic sculptures using dances to physically move the sculpture presented. In addition to performances, the organization also gives slide shows and demonstrations. The organization’s principal sources of support will be from grants from private foundations, schools, and state art councils to enable it to give free performances and workshops. ORG, Inc.’s secondary source of support will be from receipts from performances to which tickets are sold. On August 6, 19xx, ORG, Inc. was granted exemption from federal income tax under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page_1 publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

Schedule number or exhibit

Form 886-A

(Rev. January 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS

Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended

ORG June 30, 20xx

On April 29, 20xx a letter was received by the Internal Revenue Service from the Office of the Attorney General regarding the operations of ORG, Inc. The letter states that ORG, Inc.’s articles provide for the use of the same name as a for-profit created on March 10, 19xx by Director. The for-profit ORG, Inc. was created for the following purposes:

(a) To engage in the business of marketing designs, developing designs and manufacturing products from developed designs.

(b) To carry on any business or other activity which may be lawfully carried on by a corporation organized under the Business Corporation Law of the State.

The letter states that the for-profit ORG, Inc. was involuntarily dissolved on December 31, 19xx. The letter states that the majority of information that is publicly available about ORG, Inc.’s activities relate to the rental of an exhibition space and the creation of fabric structures for commercial purposes. The following discrepancies were noted by the Attorney General’s Office from ORG, Inc.’s 20xx Form 990:

1) The organization’s website www.ORGinc.org immediately goes to www.ORGinc.com which contains no reference to the non-profit, its charitable mission or activity. The website describes ORG, Inc.’s activities as event marketing, architecture and retail, exhibits and conferences, hotels and other venues and lists clients.

2) $ million reported in revenue for “rentals and other income” and describes it as “income from furnishing facilities below fair market value to organizations whose activities are in furtherance of ORG, Inc.’s tax exempt purpose,” but it would seem that the revenue predominantly comes from creating signs and marketing for commercial purposes;

3) That more than million in expenses is for “enrich[ing] the public with performance and visual fabric art by putting on performances and offering below market ticket prices,” but the performances appear to be commercial in nature, comprised largely of marketing events and trade shows;

4) That the entity made significant revenue over the last several years, $1 in 20xx, $1 in 20xx, $2 in 20xx, and $3 in 20xx, but how that revenue was used for charitable purposes is unclear; and,

5) Creator and President signed the Form 990 identifying herself as its owner.

A comparative analysis of ORG, Inc.'s revenues and expenses as reported on Forms 990 for tax years 20xx, 20xx, and 20xx is detailed below.

Revenue 20xx Form 990 20xx Form 990 20xx Form 990

Rentals and Other Income $1 $2 $1

Total Revenue $1 $2 $1
Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page_2 publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

Schedule number or exhibit
Form 886-A
(Rev. January 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS
Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended
ORG June 30, 20xx
Expenses 20xx Form 990 | 20xx Form 990 | 20xx Form 990

Production Supply Expenses
Salaries and Wages of Employees
Office Expenses
Compensation of Officers and Directors
Postage and Shipping
Advertising and Promotion
Occupancy
Employee Benefits
Travel
Miscellaneous Expense
Payroll Taxes
Accounting Fees
Bank Charges
Trade Show Entry Fees
Professional Fees
Fees for Services - Other
Legal Fees
Supplies
Insurance
Conferences and Conventions
Commissions
Payroll Fees
Service Charges
Office Expenses
interest
Information Technology
Computer Expense
Automobile Expense
Utilities
Depreciation and Depletion
Telephone
Equipment Rental and Maintenance
All Other Expenses
Total Expenses (1) (2) (1)
Net Income (Loss) $1 (1) $1

ORG, Inc. was notified by the Internal Revenue Service on December 13, 20xx of a pending examination of its books and records to be conducted on March 23, 20xx of the Form 990 for the tax year ended June 30, 20xx. The Executive Director listed on the organization’s Form 990 is Director Director appointed CPA, to act as Power of Attorney for the organization. The examination was conducted at the accounting firm.

On March 23, 20xx, an initial interview was conducted with the organization’s Power of Attorney, Mr. CPA, to obtain an understanding of the organization’s activities during the year under examination. Mr. CPA stated that ORG, Inc. generated income from performance fees and renting its art. He stated that the non-profit organization never received any contributions or ever solicited donations. Mr CPA stated that ORG, Inc. was leasing space in State to create its art in an apartment owned by an unrelated 3™ party. Mr.

Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page 3 publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

Schedule number or exhibit

Form 886-A
(Rev. January 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS

Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended

ORG June 30, 20xx

CPA stated that the apartment was never used as a personal residence by ORG, Inc. Mr. CPA stated that ORG, Inc. is no longer operating and is in the process of filing its final returns.

During the year under examination, ORG, Inc. maintained the website, http:/Avwww.ORGincdesign.com. The website states that ORG, Inc. creates fabric structures for events, event marketing and architectural industries. In addition to the tension fabric forms available for rent or purchase, the organization offers custom design services. ORG, Inc.’s design team has extensive experience in fine arts, graphic and industrial arts, costume and fashion design. The website states that ORG, Inc.'s rental line represents cost-effective solutions for stage sets, trade shows, costumes, entrance ways, and ceiling treatments for all design industries including event, event marketing, exhibit and retail displays, exhibit design, fabric architecture and hospitality. The website states that fabric solutions are lightweight, flexible, and adaptive to transform any environment through décor, structure, performance, sculpture and dramatic anchors for live experiences. ORG, Inc.’s stretch fabric structures are known worldwide for design and manufacturing consistency, reliability and their cost-effective ability to transform space. The website provides ORG, Inc.’s client list. The website pages of ORG, Inc. are included as exhibits beginning on page 9 of the report.

On August 19, 20xx, the Internal Revenue Service mailed Letter 3606 with an Information Document Request to Director with a copy to Mr. CPA. The letter requested the organization to provide a detailed explanation and contemporaneous supporting documentation for the expenses detailed below:

Expenses: For-Profit Business Purpose: Amount: Percentage: _

Total $1 100.00%

On August 25, 20xx Letter 3606 mailed to ORG, Inc.’s address of record was returned to the Internal Revenue Service. The postal service provided an updated address on the envelope for ORG, Inc. as

Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page 4 publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

Schedule number or exhibit

Form 886-A
(Rev. January 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS

Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended

ORG June 30, 20xx

State. The reason provided by the postal service for returning the letter to the Internal Revenue Service was because the mail forwarding service had expired.

On September 20, 20xx, the organization's Power of Attorney, Mr CPA, was contacted because no response was provided to the Information Document Request mailed to him on August 19, 20xx. Mr. CPA advised the Service that he would no longer be representing ORG, Inc.

During the year under examination, ORG, Inc. received 100% of its revenue from sales and rentals of its art. The organization did not receive any contributions from the general public. The Internal Revenue Service sampled the organization's expenses and discovered that 0% of ORG, Inc.’s total expenses incurred for the year were used to further for-profit commercial activities. During the year under examination, ORG, Inc.’s activities and resources were directed to benefit a for-profit business, rather than exclusively to accomplish Section 501(c)(3) purposes. Therefore, ORG, Inc. does not qualify for exemption from federal income tax under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Law:
Internal Revenue Code

Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code provides for the exemption from taxation corporations, and any community chest, fund, or foundation, organized and operated exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, testing for public safety, literary, or educational purposes, or to foster national or international amateur sports competition (but only if no part of its activities involve the provision of athletic facilities or equipment), or for the prevention of cruelty to children or animals, no part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual, no substantial part of the activities of which is carrying on propaganda, or otherwise attempting, to influence legislation (except as otherwise provided in subsection (h)), and which does not participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public Office.

Section 6001 of the Code states that every person liable for any tax imposed by this title, or for the collection thereof, shall Keep such records, render such statements, make such returns, and comply with such rules and regulations as the Secretary may from time to time prescribe. Whenever in the judgment of the Secretary it is necessary, he may require any person, by notice served upon such person or by regulations, to make such returns, render such statements, or keep such records, as the Secretary deems sufficient to show whether or not such person is liable for tax under this title.

Federal Tax Regulations

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1) of the Federal Tax Regulations states in order to be exempt as an organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, an organization must be both organized and operated exclusively for one or more of the purposes specified in such section. If an organization fails to meet either the organizational test or the operational test, it is not exempt.

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(2) of the regulations states that the term “charitable” is used in Section 501(c)(3) of the Code in its generally accepted legal sense. Such term includes relieving the poor and distressed or the underprivileged, advancement of education or science, lessening of the burdens of government, combating community deterioration, lessening neighborhood tensions, and eliminating prejudice and discrimination.

Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page__5 publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

Schedule number or exhibit

Form 886-A
(Rev. January 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS

Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended

ORG June 30, 20xx

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(3)(b) of the regulations states that the term “educational” as used in Section 501(c)(3) of the Code relates to the instruction of the public on subjects useful to the individual and beneficial to the community.

Court Cases

In the case of Airlie Foundation v. Internal Revenue Service., 283 F. Supp. 2d 58, the United States District Court upheld the Service’s position to revoke the organization's tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code. The grounds for revocation included the organization's earnings inuring to the benefit of its founder and the organization's operation of a conference center in a commercial manner. The Court stated that in cases where the organization's activities could be carried out for either exempt or non- exempt purposes, the manner in which the activities are carried out must be examined in order to determine their true purpose. In assessing an organization’s claim for tax-exempt status under the operational test, the court considers competition with for-profit commercial entities; extent and degree of below cost services provided; pricing policies; reasonableness of financial reserves; whether the organization uses commercial promotional methods; and the extent to which the organization receives charitable donations.

In the case of B.S.W. Group, Incorporated v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue., 70 T.C. 352, the United States Tax Court upheld the Service's position to deny the organization's application for recognition of exemption under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code for failing to meet the operational test by primarily engaging in a trade or business. The Court stated that under the operational test, the purpose towards which an organization’s activities are directed, and not the nature of the activities themselves, ultimately determines the organization's right to be classified as a Section 501(c)(3) organization. The fact that the organization's activities may constitute a trade or business does not, of itself, disqualify it from classification under Section 501(c)(3), provided the activity furthers or accomplishes an exempt purpose. Rather, the critical inquiry is whether the organization’s primary purpose for engaging in the activities is an exempt purpose, or whether its primary purpose is the non-exempt purpose of operating a commercial business. Factors such as the particular manner in which an organization's activities are conducted, the commercial hue of those activities, and the existence and amount of annual or accumulated profits are relevant evidence of a non-exempt purpose.

In the case of the Better Business Bureau of Washington, D.C., v. United States., 326 U.S. 279, 66 S. Ct. 112, the Supreme Court of the United States determined that for the Better Business Bureau of Washington, D.C. to fall within exemption from taxation, the organization must be devoted exclusively to educational purposes, and the presence of a single non-educational purpose, if substantial in nature, will destroy the exemption regardless of the number or importance of truly educational purposes. The Court stated that it is apparent beyond dispute that an important, if not primary, pursuit of the Better Business Bureau of Washington, D.C. is to promote not only an ethical but also a profitable business community.

The Court stated that the commercial hue permeating the organization is reflected in its corporate title and in the charter provisions dedicating the organization to the promotion of the ‘mutual welfare, protection and improvement of business methods among merchants’ and others and to the securing of the ‘educational and scientific advancements of business methods’ so that merchants might ‘successfully and profitably conduct their business.’ The Court stated that the organization’s activities are largely animated by this commercial purpose. Unethical business practices and fraudulent merchandising schemes are investigated, exposed and destroyed. The Court stated that such efforts to cleanse the business system of dishonest practices are highly commendable and may even serve incidentally to educate certain persons

Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page 6 publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

Schedule number or exhibit

Form 886-A
(Rev. January 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS

Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended

ORG June 30, 20xx

but that they are directed fundamentally to ends other than that of education. The Court stated that any claim that education is the sole aim of the organization is thereby destroyed.

Revenue Rulings

Revenue Ruling 71-529, 1971-2 C.B. 234, considered whether an organization that provides assistance in the management of participating colleges and university's endowment fund substantially below cost qualifies for exemption under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code. Membership in the organization is restricted to colleges and universities exempt under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code. The organization will not make its services available to anyone other than the exempt organizations controlling it. Most of the operating expenses of the organization, including the costs of the services of the investment counselors and the custodian banks, are paid for by grants from independent charitable organizations. The member organizations pay a nominal fee for the services performed. By performing this function for the organization for a charge that is substantially below cost, the organization is performing a charitable activity within the meaning of Section 501(c)(3) of the Code. Accordingly, it is held that the organization qualifies for exemption from federal income tax under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code.

Revenue Ruling 72-369, 1972-2 C.B. 245, considered whether an organization formed to provide managerial and consulting services at cost to unrelated exempt organizations qualifies for exemption under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code. The services consist of writing job descriptions and training manuals, recruiting personnel, constructing organizational charts, and advising organizations on specific methods of operation. To satisfy the operational test the organization’s resources must be devoted to purposes that qualify as exclusively charitable within the meaning of Section 501(c)(3) of the Code. An organization is not exempt merely because its operations are not conducted for the purpose of producing a profit. Providing managerial and consulting services on a regular basis for a fee is a trade or business ordinarily carried on for profit. The fact that the services are provided at cost and solely for exempt organizations is not sufficient to characterize the activity as charitable within the meaning of Section 501(c)(3) of the Code. Accordingly, it is held that the organization’s activities are not charitable and therefore the organization does not qualify for exemption from federal income tax under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code.

Taxpayer’s Position:

ORG, Inc.’s position with respect to the issues, facts, applicable law, and government's position as discussed in this report is unknown. The organization will be allowed 30-days to review this report and respond with a rebuttal if considered necessary.

Government's Position:

In order to qualify for exemption under Internal Revenue Code Section 501(c)(3), an organization must be both organized and operated exclusively for charitable or educational purposes, provided that no part of the net earnings of such corporation inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual. The purpose of ORG, Inc. as provided in its Articles of Incorporation is to present multi-media performances of art in motion, through the interaction of visual and performing arts, using sculptured form, music, lighting and film; to create and present abstractions of the human body and humanizations of abstract sculptured ideas; to educate and promote public awareness of this multi-media form of art through workshops; installations, slide and video shows, seminars and discussion groups. However, there has been no

Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page 7 publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

Schedule number or exhibit

Form 886-A
(Rev. January 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS

Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended

ORG June 30, 20xx

evidence provided in the record to demonstrate that ORG, Inc. has provided any form of education, public awareness seminars or discussion groups to benefit the general public.

During the year under examination, ORG, Inc. operated in a manner similar to the for-profit corporation considered in Airlie Foundation v. Internal Revenue Service., 283 F. Supp. 2d 58 in which the United States District Court upheld the Service’s position to revoke the organization’s tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code. The Court ruled that Airlie Foundation operated in a commercial manner and did not further tax-exempt purposes as described under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code. Similarly, ORG, Inc. sold its products in a commercial manner and competed with for-profit entities providing similar services. During the year under examination, ORG, Inc. did not operate to further tax-exempt purposes as described under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code.

In the case of B.S.W. Group, Incorporated v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue., 70 T.C. 352, the United States Tax Court upheld the Service’s position to deny the organization’s application for recognition of exemption under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code for failing to meet the operational test by primarily engaging in a trade or business. The Court stated that factors such as the particular manner in which an organization’s activities are conducted, the commercial hue of those activities, and the existence and amount of annual or accumulated profits are relevant evidence of a non-exempt purpose. During the year under examination, ORG, Inc. operated solely in a manner indistinguishable from a for-profit business. The organization maintained a website similar to a for-profit business advertising its products for sale or rent. The website also listed for-profit companies as its clients and there is no mention on the website of any charitable or educational services provided by the organization.

In the case of the Better Business Bureau of Washington, D.C., v. United States., 326 U.S. 279, 66 S. Ct. 112, the United States Supreme Court ruled that to obtain exemption from taxation, an organization

must be devoted exclusively to exempt purposes, and the presence of a single non-exempt purpose, if substantial in nature, will destroy the exemption regardless of the number or importance of truly exempt purposes. It is clearly evident that the primary purpose of ORG, Inc. is to sell or rent its fabric structures rather than to accomplish exclusively Section 501(c)(3) purposes. ORG, Inc. has not provided records to demonstrate that the organization is furthering tax-exempt purposes. During the year under examination, ORG, Inc. did not engage in any educational activities as described in the regulations. ORG, Inc. did not instruct the public on subjects useful to the individual or beneficial to the community.

Conclusion:

The exempt status of ORG, Inc. is to be revoked effective July 1, 20xx, for failing to operate in accordance with the requirements under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. For the tax year ended June 30, 20xx, the organization is required to file Form 1120. ORG, Inc. is required to file Form 1120 for all subsequent tax periods. Per Internal Revenue Code Section 6020(b)(2), the Internal Revenue Service has the authority to file substitute for returns, and assess the correct amount of tax in situations where the taxpayer fails to file the required returns.

Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page_8 publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace