Private Letter Ruling 1351011 Released December 20, 2013 Approved

PLR 1351011: taxpayer gets extra time to file Forms 3115

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2013
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer timely filed its federal return and duplicate Forms 3115 to change its depreciation accounting method, but an accounting firm accidentally failed to attach the original Forms 3115 to the electronically filed return. The IRS concluded that the taxpayer met the standards for relief under the regulatory-election rules. It granted 60 calendar days from the ruling date to file the signed original forms with an amended return. The ruling did not decide whether the taxpayer otherwise qualified for the accounting-method change.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May a taxpayer receive more time to file original Forms 3115 after they were omitted from an electronic return?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC § 446(e); Rev. Proc. 2011-14; Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201351011 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 12/20/2013 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.10-01
Person To Contact:
--------------------------------- ------------------, ID No. ------------------
---------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------------- ----------------------
----------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:B07
PLR-119937-13
Date:
September 10, 2013

Re: Request for Extension of Time to file Form 3115, Application for Change in
Accounting Method

Taxpayer = -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date1 = ----------------------

Dear -------------:

   This ruling responds to a letter dated April 18, 2013, submitted by Taxpayer,

requesting an extension of time pursuant to § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and
Administration Regulations to file original Forms 3115, Application for Change in
Accounting Method, to change Taxpayer’s method of accounting for depreciation for the
taxable year ending Date1.

FACTS

     Taxpayer represents that the facts are as follows:

    Taxpayer timely filed its federal income tax return for the taxable year ending

Date1 through an electronic filing. Taxpayer timely filed the signed duplicate copies of
the Forms 3115 to change Taxpayer’s method of accounting for depreciation for the
taxable year ending Date1 under section 6.01 of the Appendix of Rev. Proc. 2011-14,
2011-4 I.R.B. 330, with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) office in Ogden, Utah.
Taxpayer's federal income tax return for the taxable year ending Date1 reflected a
change in Taxpayer’s method of accounting for depreciation under section 6.01 of the
Appendix of Rev. Proc. 2011-14, as reflected on the duplicate filings of the copies of the
Forms 3115. However, Taxpayer inadvertently failed to attach the original Forms 3115
to its electronically filed federal income tax return for the taxable year ending Date1.
PLR-119937-13 2

   Taxpayer engaged an accounting firm to prepare and electronically file

Taxpayer’s federal income tax return and the Forms 3115 for the taxable year ending
Date1. After timely filing such federal income tax return and the signed duplicate copies
of such Forms 3115, Taxpayer and the accounting firm discovered that the accounting
firm had inadvertently not attached the required original Forms 3115 to the federal
income tax return when such federal income tax return was electronically filed.

RULING REQUESTED

  Taxpayer requests an extension of time pursuant to § 301.9100-3 of the

Procedure and Administration Regulations to file the original Forms 3115 to change
Taxpayer’s method of accounting for depreciation under section 6.01 of the Appendix of
Rev. Proc. 2011-14, 2011-4 I.R.B. 330, for the taxable year ending Date1.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

    Rev. Proc. 2011-14 provides the procedures by which a taxpayer may obtain

automatic consent to change certain methods of accounting. A taxpayer complying with
all the applicable provisions of this revenue procedure has obtained the consent of the
Commissioner of Internal Revenue to change the taxpayer’s method of accounting
under § 446(e) of the Internal Revenue Code and the Income Tax regulations
thereunder.

  Section 6.02(3)(a) of Rev. Proc. 2011-14 provides that a taxpayer changing a

method of accounting pursuant to Rev. Proc. 2011-14 must complete and file a Form
3115 in duplicate. Section 6.02(3)(a)(i) of Rev. Proc. 2011-14 provides that the original
must be attached to the taxpayer’s timely filed (including extensions) original federal
income tax return implementing the change in method of accounting for the year of
change.

   Under § 301.9100-(c)(1), the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable

extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a
regulatory election.

   Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the

Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an
election. Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain
elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do
not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

    Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be

granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of
relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.
PLR-119937-13 3

CONCLUSIONS

   Based solely on the facts and representations submitted, we conclude that the

requirements of § 301.9100-3(a) have been satisfied. Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted
60 calendar days from the date of this letter to file the original Forms 3115 (with
signature) to change Taxpayer’s method of accounting for depreciation under section
6.01 of the Appendix of Rev. Proc. 2011-14, 2011-4 I.R.B. 330, for the taxable year
ending Date1, with an amended federal income tax return for the taxable year ending
Date1.

   Except as specifically set forth above, no opinion is expressed or implied

concerning the federal income tax consequences of the facts described above under
any other provisions of the Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed or implied
concerning (i) whether Taxpayer is qualified to file the original Forms 3115 for the
change in method of accounting for depreciation under Rev. Proc. 2011-14; (ii) whether
each item of property that is the subject of such Forms 3115 meets the requirements of
section 6.01 of the Appendix of Rev. Proc. 2011-14; (iii) whether the change in method
of accounting that is the subject of such Forms 3115 qualify under section 6.01 of the
Appendix of Rev. Proc. 2011-14; or (iv) the propriety of Taxpayer’s present and
proposed methods of accounting for depreciation for each item of property that is the
subject of such Forms 3115.

  In accordance with the power of attorney, we are sending copies of this letter to

Taxpayer’s authorized representatives. We are also sending a copy of this letter to the
appropriate Industry Director, Large Business & International Division (LB&I).

    The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations

submitted by Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement. While this
office has not verified any of the material submitted in support for a ruling, it is subject to
verification on examination.
PLR-119937-13 4

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)

provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

                                             Sincerely,

                                             WILLIE E. ARMSTRONG JR.

                                             WILLIE E. ARMSTRONG JR.
                                             Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 7
                                             Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                             (Income Tax and Accounting)

Enclosures (2):
copy of this letter
copy for section 6110 purposes

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.