PLR 1351003: inadvertent S corporation and QSub terminations are waived
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An S corporation issued stock to an ineligible shareholder, which terminated its S corporation election and the related qualified subchapter S subsidiary election. The taxpayer returned the stock, revised the subscription agreement, and represented that the termination was inadvertent and that its tax filings consistently treated it as an S corporation. The IRS ruled that both terminations were inadvertent under IRC § 1362(f) and allowed the corporation and subsidiary to continue their prior tax treatment from the termination date, subject to the stated qualifications. The IRS did not rule on whether the corporation otherwise qualified as an S corporation, whether the subsidiary otherwise qualified as a QSub, or whether the revised agreement created a second class of stock.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Can the taxpayer and its subsidiary retain S corporation and QSub status after an inadvertent termination caused by an ineligible shareholder?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(b), 1362(d), 1362(f)
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201351003 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 12/20/2013 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.04-00
Person To Contact:
--------------------------------- ---------------------, ID No. ------------------
--------------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
--------------- ----------------------
------------------------------ Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B2
PLR-108815-13
Date: August 5, 2013
X = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Y = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------
Z = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A = -----------------------------------------------------------
D1 = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D2 = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D3 = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D4 = ------------
Dear ---------------
This responds to a letter dated February 11, 2013, and subsequent
correspondence, submitted on behalf of X by X’s authorized representative, requesting
relief under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.
The information submitted states that X was incorporated under the laws of State
on D1 and elected to be an S corporation effective D2. X, through its disregarded entity
(DE) Z, acquired Y and elected to treat Y as a qualified subchapter S subsidiary (QSub)
PLR-108815-13 2
effective D2. On D3, X executed a subscription agreement/promissory note in
connection with a loan. As provided in the original promissory note, X issued stock to A,
an ineligible S corporation shareholder for federal income tax purposes. Therefore, X’s
S corporation election and Y’s QSub election terminated D3. Upon being informed that
A was an ineligible S corporation shareholder, X caused the X stock held by A to be
returned to X and revised the subscription agreement/promissory note on D4 in a
manner not intended to constitute a second class of stock.
X represents that the circumstances resulting in the termination of X’s S
corporation election were inadvertent and not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive
tax planning. X further represents that X has filed returns consistent with X’s status as
an S corporation. X and its shareholders have agreed to make such adjustments
(consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation) as may be required by the
Secretary.
Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any
corporation (A) was not effective for the taxable year for which it was made (determined
without regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of
§ 1361(b) or to obtain shareholder consents, or (B) was terminated under § 1362(d)(2)
or (3), (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in such
ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of
time after discovery of the event resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination, steps
were taken (A) so that the corporation is a small business corporation, or (B) to acquire
the required shareholder consents, and (4) the corporation, and each person who was a
shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to
§ 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the
corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to
such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness
or termination, the corporation shall be treated as an S corporation during the period
specified by the Secretary.
Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude
that X’s S corporation election and Y’s QSub election were terminated on D3 because A
was not an eligible shareholder of X. We also conclude that these terminations D3 were
inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f). Therefore, we conclude that X will be
treated as an S corporation from D3 and thereafter, provided that X’s S corporation
election was otherwise valid and was not otherwise terminated under § 1362(d).
Furthermore, Y will be treated as a QSub from D3 and thereafter, provided that Y is
otherwise eligible to be treated as a QSub.
Except as specifically set forth above, no opinion is expressed or implied
concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other
provision of the Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed regarding whether X
otherwise qualifies as an S corporation, and Y otherwise qualifies as a QSub. In
PLR-108815-13 3
addition, no opinion is expressed regarding whether the revised subscription
agreement/promissory note creates a second class of stock under 1361(b)(1)(D).
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of
the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to X's authorized representative.
Sincerely,
Bradford R. Poston
Senior Counsel, Branch 2
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.