Private Letter Ruling 1345042 Released November 8, 2013 Approved Transcribed from scan

PLR 1345042: IRS recognizes a retirement plan as a church plan retroactive to 1974

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2013
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS ruled that a retirement plan sponsored by a nonprofit hospital and its successor parent organization qualified as a church plan under IRC § 414(e). The organizations were exempt under section 501(c)(3), associated with a church through their religious community, and controlled through the church's congregational leader. A retirement plan committee appointed by that leader administered the plan and had the plan's sole administrative purpose. The IRS recognized the plan as a church plan retroactive to January 1, 1974, and concluded that it was not maintained primarily for employees working in unrelated trades or businesses. The ruling did not address whether the plan separately satisfied the qualification requirements of section 401(a).

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Is Plan X a church plan under IRC § 414(e), retroactive to January 1, 1974?
  • Outcome: Approved, Plan X is a church plan retroactive to January 1, 1974.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 401(a), 414(e), 501, and 513; Rev. Proc. 2011-44; IRC § 6110(k)(3).

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

201345042

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

AUG 14 2013

U.I.L.: 414.08-00 T.EP:RA:T3





Legend:
Organization A = ***
Organization B = ***
Organization C = ***
Church R = ***
Hospital P = ***
State J = ***
Directory S = ***
Plan X = ***
Plan Y = ***

Dear ***:

This letter is in response to your request dated October 5, 2006, as
supplemented by correspondence dated July 24, 2007, November 22, 2011,
January 24, 2012, February 7, 2012, February 17, 2012, May 23, 2012, April 9,
2013 and May 22, 2013, submitted on your behalf by your authorized
representatives regarding the church plan status of Plan X within the meaning of
section 414(e) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalties of
perjury on your behalf:

Hospital P was created by Organization B of State J to meet the charitable needs
of people by providing health and human services to people in need.
Organization B is a religious community organized within Church R. Hospital P
was originally incorporated on March 20, 1908, pursuant to Articles of
Incorporation (Articles) that have been amended from time to time. The Articles
provided that the sole member of Hospital P was Organization C, a non-profit
corporation. Hospital P is exempt from Federal income taxation under section
501(a) as an organization described under section 501(c)(3) of the Code, and is
listed in Directory S, the official directory of Church R.

Under Article III of Hospital P’s Bylaws, the powers of Hospital P generally were
exercised by the Board of Trustees (Board). The Board consisted of from five to
thirty trustees, including the congregational leader of Organization B and two
trustees who were the designated representatives of Organization B. The exact
number of trustees was fixed by Organization C and with the exception of the
congregational leader of Organization B, the two representatives of Organization
B, and the President of Hospital P, all trustees were subject to certain term
limitations. Trustees were required to agree to conduct the activities and
business of Hospital P under the philosophy of, and ethical and religious
directives for, Church R health facilities as adopted by the national clerical
leadership of Church R and implemented by Organization B. In addition, the
congregational leader of Organization B had the right to veto any trustee
otherwise approved by Organization C.

In June, 2010, Hospital P participated in a reorganization, which resulted in the
creation of a new parent corporation known as Organization A. Organization A is
a nonprofit State J corporation exempt from Federal income taxation under
section 501(a) of the Code by virtue of being an organization described in section
501(c)(3) of the Code. Article III of Organization A’s restated Bylaws provides
that the sole member of Organization A is the congregational leader of
Organization B. The Board of Governors (Governors) has the authority to
manage Organization A, but the congregational leader of Organization B has the
sole authority and discretion to appoint and remove all Governors of Organization
A, as well as the trustees of any subsidiaries, and the executive director of any
subsidiary of Organization A. The congregational leader of Organization B also
has the sole authority to veto any action by Organization A or its Governors, and
to exercise any powers designated to Organization A with respect to any
subsidiary.

Effective January 1, 1964, Hospital P established Plan Y, a retirement savings
plan, for the benefit of its employees and the employees of its subsidiaries. In
June, 2010, Organization A assumed the sponsorship of Plan Y and renamed it
Plan X. Plan X is a qualified plan as described in section 401(a) of the Code.

Organization A has not made an election under section 410(d) of the Code with
respect to Plan X.

Plan X is administered by a Retirement Plan Committee (Committee), whose
members are appointed by the congregational leader of Organization B. In the
past, the Committee was controlled by the Board which was controlled by Church
R, currently the Committee is controlled by the congregational leader of
Organization B. The Committee serves as the Plan X administrator, and
exercises the sole authority to construe and to interpret the provisions of Plan X,
determine eligibility for benefits thereunder and otherwise manage the operations
of Plan X.

In accordance with Revenue Procedure 2011-44, 2011-39 I.R.B. 446, Notice to
Employees with reference to Plan X was originally provided on November 21,
2011 and was reissued on April 29, 2013 with a minor correction. This notice
explained to participants of Plan X the consequences of church plan status.

Based on the foregoing, you request a ruling that Plan X is a church plan under
the provisions of section 414(e) of the Code effective as of January 1, 1974.

Section 414(e) was added to the Code by section 1015 of ERISA. Section
1017(e) of ERISA provided that section 414(e) of the Code applied as of the date
of ERISA’s enactment. However, section 414(e) of the Code was subsequently
amended by section 407(b) of the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act
of 1980, Pub. Law 96-364, to provide that section 414(e) of the Code was
effective as of January 1, 1974.

Section 414(e)(1) of the Code generally defines a church plan as a plan
established and maintained for its employees (or their beneficiaries) by a church
or a convention or association of churches which is exempt from taxation under
section 501 of the Code.

Section 414(e)(2) of the Code provides, in part, that the term “church plan” does
not include a plan that is established and maintained primarily for the benefit of
employees (or their beneficiaries) of such church or convention or association of
churches who are employed in connection with one or more unrelated trades or
businesses (within the meaning of section 513 of the Code); or if less than
substantially all of the individuals included in the plan are individuals described in
section 414(e)(1) of the Code or section 414(e)(3)(B) of the Code (or their
beneficiaries).

Section 414(e)(3)(A) of the Code provides that a plan established and maintained
for its employees (or their beneficiaries) by a church or by a convention or
association of churches includes a plan maintained by an organization, whether a
civil law corporation or otherwise, the principal purpose or function of which is the
administration or funding of a plan or program for the provision of retirement
benefits or welfare benefits, or both, for the employees of a church or a
convention or association of churches, if such organization is controlled by or
associated with a church or a convention or association of churches.

Section 414(e)(3)(B) of the Code defines “employee” of a church or a convention
or association of churches to include a duly ordained, commissioned, or licensed
minister of a church in the exercise of his or her ministry, regardless of the
source of his or her compensation, and an employee of an organization, whether
a civil law corporation or otherwise, which is exempt from tax under section 501
of the Code, and which is controlled by or associated with a church or a
convention or association of churches.

Section 414(e)(3)(C) of the Code provides that a church or a convention or
association of churches which is exempt from tax under section 501 of the Code
shall be deemed the employer of any individual included as an employee under
subparagraph (B).

Section 414(e)(3)(D) of the Code provides that an organization, whether a civil
law corporation or otherwise, is associated with a church or a convention or
association of churches if the organization shares common religious bonds and
convictions with that church or convention or association of churches.

Revenue Procedure 2011-44, 2011-39 I.R.B. 446 supplements the procedures
for requesting a letter ruling under section 414(e) of the Code relating to church
plans. The revenue procedure: (1) requires that plan participants and other
interested persons receive a notice in connection with a letter ruling request
under section 414(e) of the Code for a qualified plan; (2) requires that a copy of
the notice be submitted to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) as part of the
ruling request; and (3) provides procedures for the IRS to receive and consider
comments relating to the ruling request from interested persons.

In order for an organization that is not itself a church or convention or association
of churches to have a qualified church plan, it must establish that its employees
are employees or deemed employees of a church or convention or association of
churches under section 414(e)(3)(B) of the Code by virtue of the organization’s
control by or affiliation with a church or convention or association of churches.
Employees of any organization maintaining a plan are considered to be church
employees if the organization: (1) is exempt from tax under section 501 of the
Code; and, (2) is controlled by or associated with a church or convention or
association of churches. In addition, in order to be a church plan, the plan must
be administered or funded (or both) by an organization described in section
414(e)(3)(A) of the Code. To be described in section 414(e)(3)(A) of the Code,
an organization must have as its principal purpose the administration or funding
of the plan and must also be controlled by or associated with a church or
convention or association of churches.

In this case, Organization A, and its predecessor Hospital P, are organizations
described in section 501(c)(3) of the Code which are exempt from tax under
section 501(a) of the Code. Organization A is listed in Directory S which is the
official directory of Church R. The sole member of Organization A is the
congregational leader of Organization B. Organization B is a religious
community which carries out the functions of Church R and is listed in Directory
S. Therefore, Organization A, is indirectly controlled by Church R through its
relationship with Organization B.

In view of the common religious bonds between Church R and Organization A,
and the indirect control of Organization A by Church R through Organization B,
we conclude that Organization A, the successor to Hospital P, is associated with
a church or a convention or association of churches within the meaning of
section 414(e)(3)(D) of the Code, that the employees of Organization A meet the
definition of employee under section 414(e)(3)(B) of the Code, and that they are
deemed to be employees of a church or a convention or association of churches
by virtue of being employees of an organization which is exempt from tax under
section 501 of the Code and which is controlled by or associated with a church or
a convention or association of churches.

Plan X is administered by the Committee whose members are appointed by the
congregational leader of Organization B. In the past, the Board controlled the
Committee, but currently the congregational leader of Organization B controls the
Committee. Therefore the Committee is associated with and under the control of
Organization B, and is indirectly associated with and under the control of Church
R. Further, as represented above, the sole purpose of the Committee is the
administration of Plan X for the provision of retirement benefits for the employees
of Organization A. As a result, the Committee constitutes an organization
described in section 414(e)(3)(A) of the Code.

Based on the foregoing facts and representations, we conclude that Plan X is a
church plan within the meaning of section 414(e) of the Code, and has been a
church plan within the meaning of section 414(e) of the Code retroactive to
January 1, 1974. In addition, we conclude that Plan X has not been maintained
primarily for the benefit of employees who are employed in connection with one
or more unrelated trades or business as defined in section 513 of the Code.

This letter expresses no opinion as to whether Plan X satisfies the requirements
for qualification under section 401(a) of the Code.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

A copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representatives pursuant to a
Power of Attorney on file in this office.

If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact * * , ID Number * *
, at * * *. Please address all correspondence to SE:T:EP:RA:T3.

Sincerely yours,

[illegible signature]

Laura B. Warshawsky, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 3

Enclosures:
Deleted copy of letter ruling
Notice 437

cc: ***

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.