Private Letter Ruling 1345024 Released November 8, 2013 Approved

PLR 1345024: IRS grants relief for an inadvertent S corporation termination

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2013
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A corporation asked the IRS for relief after its S corporation election terminated when a grantor trust continued holding stock beyond the two-year post-death period for an eligible shareholder. The corporation represented that the termination was inadvertent and that it and its shareholders would make the required adjustments. The IRS ruled that the corporation would continue to be treated as an S corporation from the termination date, provided the election was otherwise valid and the trustee made an ESBT election effective that date within 120 days. The relief was conditioned on the corporation and its shareholders reporting consistently with S corporation treatment, including the required income, basis, and distribution adjustments.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Can the corporation's S corporation election continue after an inadvertent termination caused by a trust's failure to make a timely ESBT election?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361, 1362, 1366, 1367, and 1368

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201345024 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 11/8/2013 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.04-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------------------- -----------------------, ID No. -------------------
--------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------
-------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------------ ----------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B03
PLR-122662-13
Date: July 17, 2013

                                                   LEGEND

X = -------------------------

H = -----------------------

W = ---------------------------

Trust = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

D1 = --------------------

D2 = -----------------

Dear --------------:

   This letter responds to a letter dated May 10, 2013, and subsequent

correspondence, submitted on behalf of X requesting a ruling under § 1362(f) of the
Internal Revenue Code (Code).

PLR-122662-13 2

                                     FACTS

   The information submitted states that X is a corporation that made an election to

be treated as a subchapter S corporation. All of the stock in X was community property
held by Trust, a grantor trust described in § 1361(c)(2)(A)(i) of which H and W were the
deemed owners.

    W died on D1. Relative to W’s share of X stock, Trust qualified under

§ 1361(c)(2)(A)(ii) as an eligible shareholder for two years from W’s date of death.
However, Trust continued to hold the X stock after the two-year period. As a result, X’s
S corporation election terminated on D2, the day after the two-year period following W’s
death. According to X, Trust qualifies as an electing small business trust (“ESBT”), but
its trustee made no ESBT election.

   X represents that the circumstances resulting in the termination of X’s S

corporation election were inadvertent and were not motivated by tax avoidance or
retroactive tax planning. X and its shareholders have agreed to make such
adjustments, consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation, as may be required
by the Service.

                                 LAW AND ANALYSIS

   Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(ii) provides that for purposes of § 1361(b)(1)(B), a trust

which was described in § 1361(c)(2)(A)(i) immediately before the death of the deemed
owner and which continues in existence after such death may be a shareholder, but
only for the 2-year period beginning on the day of the deemed owner’s death.

 Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(v) provides that for purposes of § 1361(b)(1)(B), an ESBT

may be a shareholder.

    Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any

corporation (A) was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined
without regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of
§ 1361(b) or to obtain shareholder consents or (B) was terminated under § 1362(d)(2)
or (3), (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in the
ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of
time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination,
steps were taken (A) so that the corporation is a small business corporation or (B) to
acquire the shareholder consents, and (4) the corporation and each person who was a
shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to
§ 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the
corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to
such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or

PLR-122662-13 3

termination, the corporation will be treated as an S corporation during the period
specified by the Secretary.

                                 CONCLUSION

    Based solely on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that

X’s election to be treated as an S corporation terminated on D2, after the two-year
period following W’s death. We also conclude that the termination constituted an
inadvertent termination within the meaning of § 1362(f). Accordingly, X will be treated
as continuing to be an S corporation from D2, and thereafter, provided that X’s S
corporation election was otherwise valid and was not otherwise terminated under
§ 1362(d). In addition, Trust will be treated as an ESBT from D2, and thereafter,
provided the trustee of Trust files an ESBT election for Trust with the appropriate
service center, effective D2, within 120 days of the date of this letter. A copy of this
letter should be attached to that election.

    This ruling is contingent on X and all its shareholders treating X as having been

an S corporation for the period beginning on D2, and thereafter. Accordingly, X’s
shareholders must include their pro rata share of the separately stated and
nonseparately computed items of X as provided in § 1366, make any adjustments to
basis as provided in § 1367, and take into account any distributions made by X as
provided in § 1368. If X or its shareholders fail to treat themselves as described above,
this ruling shall be null and void.

   Except as expressly provided herein, we express or imply no opinion concerning

the federal tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter. Specifically, we express or imply no opinion regarding whether
X is otherwise eligible to be treated as an S corporation.

    This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)

provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. Pursuant to a power of attorney
on file, we are sending a copy of this letter to X’s authorized representative.

                                  Sincerely,

                                  /s/
                                  Richard T. Probst
                                  Senior Technician Reviewer
                                  Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                  (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.