Private Letter Ruling 1345020 Released November 8, 2013 Approved

PLR 1345020: Mandatory retiree-health contributions are excluded from employee income and wages

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2013
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A municipal corporation asked how mandatory employee contributions to retiree healthcare trusts should be treated for federal tax purposes. The contributions were required by city provisions and employee agreements, could not be exchanged for salary or other benefits, and could be used only for medical expenses. The IRS ruled that the contributions were treated as employer contributions and excluded from employees’ gross income under IRC section 106. It also ruled that the contributions were not wages subject to FICA, FUTA, or federal income-tax withholding.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Are mandatory employee contributions to retiree-health trusts excluded from income and employment wages?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 61, 106, 3121, 3306, and 3401

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201345020 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 11/8/2013 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 106.00-00
Person To Contact:
---------------------- -----------------, ID No. ------------------
------------------------------- Telephone Number:
----------------------- ----------------------
-------------------------- Refer Reply To:
-------------------------------------- CC:TEGE:EB:HW
--------------------------------- PLR-113160-13
Date:
August 06, 2013

Legend

City = -----------------------
------------------------

State = -------------------------

Trust A = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Trust B = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Dear ---------------:

This is in response to your letter of March 13, 2013, and subsequent correspondence, in
which you request rulings on behalf of City concerning the proper treatment for federal
tax purposes of contributions that are made to retiree healthcare trusts. City is a
municipal corporation in State. City Code provisions establish contribution rates for the
City and eligible employees to contribute to fund post-employment healthcare. In
addition to the City Code provisions, City entered into collective bargaining or other
agreements with various employee groups requiring both City and employees to
contribute to the cost of funding retiree healthcare.

PLR-113160-13 2

The City has established retiree health trusts, Trust A and Trusts B, to receive the
employer and employee contributions. Each trust fund is used as a funding vehicle,
whereby the administrator of the trust fund accepts the contributions and forwards the
contributions to the custodian for holding and administration. The trustees of each trust
fund hold, invest, and reinvest the contributions. Benefits are paid from the trust funds.

The City has also adopted Resolutions that incorporate the following representations
regarding employee contributions to the retiree healthcare trust funds: (1) Employee
contributions are mandatory reductions in salary and will be used solely to fund the trust
funds; (2) Employee contributions are a condition of employment with City; (3)
Participation in retiree healthcare is mandatory for all employees subject to the
coverage terms established by City Code provisions; (4) Employees may not elect to
receive salary or benefits in lieu of making the mandatory contributions, and (5)
Distributions may be used only for medical expenses described in section 213(d) of the
Internal Revenue Code (Code).

Section 61(a)(1) of the Code and section 1.61-21(a)(3) of the Income Tax Regulations
provide that, except as otherwise provided in Subtitle A of the Code, gross income
includes compensation for services, including fees, commissions, fringe benefits, and
similar items.

However, section 106(a) of the Code provides that gross income of an employee does
not include employer-provided coverage under an accident or health plan.

Section 1.106-1(a) of the regulations provides that the gross income of an employee
does not include contributions which his employer makes to an accident or health plan
for compensation (through insurance or otherwise) to the employee for personal injuries
or sickness incurred by him, his spouse, or his dependents, as defined in section 152.
The employer may contribute to an accident or health plan either by paying the premium
(or a portion of the premium) on a policy of accident or health insurance covering one or
more of his employees, or by contributing to a separate trust or fund (including a fund
referred to in section 105(e)) which provides accident and health benefits directly or
through insurance to one or more of his employees. However, if the insurance policy,
trust or fund provides other benefits in addition to accident or health, section 106 applies
only to the portion of the contributions allocable to accident or health benefits.

Coverage provided under an accident and health plan to former employees and their
spouses and dependents is excludable from gross income under section 106. See Rev.
Rul. 62-199, 1962-2 C.B. 32; Rev. Rul. 82-196, 1982-2 C.B. 53.

Section 3101 imposes taxes under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) on
an employee’s wages. Section 3306 imposes taxes under the Federal Unemployment
Tax Act (FUTA). Sections 3121(a) and 3306(b) provide that, with certain exceptions, for

PLR-113160-13 3

FICA and FUTA tax purposes, the term “wages” means all remuneration for
employment, including the cash value of all remuneration (including benefits) paid in
any medium other than cash. However, sections 3121(a)(2) and 3306(b)(2) provide that
the term “wages” does not include any payment (including any amount paid by an
employer for insurance) made to or on behalf of an employee or any of his dependents,
for medical or hospitalization expenses. Section 3401(a) of the Code provides that for
purposes of federal income tax withholding, “wages” means all remuneration for
services performed by an employee for his employer, including the cash value of all
remuneration (including benefits) paid in any medium other than cash. However,
Rev.Rul. 56-632, 1956-2 C.B. 101, holds that when premiums paid by an employer
under policies providing hospital and surgical services are excludable from the
employees' gross income under section 106 of the Code, the amounts paid by the
employer are not subject to federal income tax withholding.

Based on the information submitted and representations made, we conclude as follows:
(1) Mandatory employee contributions that are made to the retiree health trust funds
pursuant to City Code provisions, collective bargaining agreements and City
Resolutions, are treated as employer contributions and are excludable from City
employees’ gross income under section 106 of the Code.

(2) Mandatory employee contributions that are made to the retiree health trust funds
pursuant to City Code provisions, collective bargaining agreements and City
Resolutions, are not “wages” and are not subject to FICA taxes under section 3121(a),
FUTA taxes under section 3306(b) or income tax withholding under section 3401(a) of
the Code.

No opinion is expressed concerning the federal tax consequences under any other
provision of the Code other than those specifically stated herein.

This ruling is directed only to the Taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

PLR-113160-13 4

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.

                                                     Sincerely,



                                                     Harry Beker
                                                     Health & Welfare Branch
                                                     Office of Division
                                                     Counsel/Associate Chief Counsel
                                                     (Tax Exempt & Government
                                                     Entities)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.