Private Letter Ruling 1341038 Released October 11, 2013 Approved Transcribed from scan

PLR 1341038: IRS waives the 60-day rollover deadline after conflicting advice and a family illness

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2013
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS revised an earlier ruling and waived the 60-day deadline for rolling a retirement-plan distribution into an IRA. The taxpayer said that conflicting advice from a credit union and a tax adviser, together with his mother's medical condition and death, caused the delay. The IRS granted 60 days from the issuance of the revised ruling for the taxpayer to contribute the distribution to a rollover IRA, provided the other requirements of section 402(c) were met. The ruling matters because it treated the contribution as a rollover despite the missed original deadline.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the IRS waive the 60-day rollover requirement for a distribution from the taxpayer's retirement plan?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 401(a)(9), 402(c), and 6110(k)(3); Rev. Proc. 2003-16

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

JUL 19 2013

[illegible handwritten notation]

U.I.L. 402.08-00
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Legend:

Taxpayer A = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.
Individual B = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Plan X = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Credit Union B = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Company N = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Amount A = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Amount B = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Amount C = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Dear XXXXXXXXx:

This is a revision of my ruling letter dated April 30, 2013. In your letter dated October 21, 2012, as supplemented by correspondence dated May 3, 2013, and June 3, 2013, you requested a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 402(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in support of the ruling requested.

Taxpayer A represents that he received a distribution from Plan X totaling Amount A. Taxpayer A asserts that his failure to accomplish a rollover within the 60-day period prescribed by section 402(c)(3) of the Code was due to his having received conflicting advice from the Credit Union B and from his tax advisor compounded by his preoccupation with the medical condition and death of his mother, Individual B.

On December 6, 20 , Taxpayer A received a statement from Company N, indicating the distribution of Amount A less Federal Income Tax withholding in the amount of Amount B from Plan X for a net distribution of Amount C. Upon receipt of the statement, Taxpayer A called his former employer, Company N, and was informed that a check representing his investment in Plan X had been mailed to him on December 2, 20 . Taxpayer A represents that he told Company N that he had never requested nor received the check that was mailed to him on December 2, 20 . On February 29, 20 , Company N re-issued the check for the amount of Amount C. Also, on February 29, 20 , Taxpayer A attempted to open an IRA with Credit Union B but was advised by his accountant that he had missed the deadline. On March 30, 20 , Taxpayer A deposited Amount C into a non-IRA account with Credit Union B intending to research his rollover options.

Taxpayer A also represents that he was the primary caregiver of Individual B starting on August 13, 20 , until the death of Individual B on April 3, 20 .

Based on the above facts and representations, you request a ruling that the Internal Revenue Service waive the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount A.

Section 402(c)(1) of the Code provides that if any portion of the balance to the credit of an employee in a qualified trust is paid to the employee in an eligible rollover distribution, and the distributee transfers any portion of the property received in such distribution to an eligible retirement plan, and in the case of a distribution of property other than money, the amount so transferred consists of the property distributed, then such distribution (to the extent transferred) shall not be included in gross income for the taxable year in which paid. Section 402(c)(3)(A) states that such rollover must be accomplished within 60 days following the day on which the distributee received the property. An individual retirement account (IRA) constitutes one form of eligible retirement plan.

Section 402(c)(4) of the Code provides that an eligible rollover distribution shall not include any distribution to the extent such distribution is required under section 401(a)(9) of the Code.

Section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code provides, in relevant part, that the Secretary may waive the 60-day requirement under section 402(c) where the failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001, are eligible for the waiver under section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code.

Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359, (January 27, 2003), provides that in determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to section 402(c)(3) of the Code, the Service will consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal error, (3) the use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the distribution occurred.

The information presented and documentation submitted by Taxpayer A is consistent with his assertion that his failure to accomplish a timely rollover was due to his having received conflicting advice from the Credit Union B and from his tax advisor compounded by his preoccupation with the medical condition and death of his mother, Individual B.

Therefore, pursuant to section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code, the Service hereby waives the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount A from Plan X. Taxpayer A is granted a period of 60 days from the issuance of this ruling letter to contribute Amount A into a rollover IRA. Provided all other requirements of section 402(c)(3) of the Code, except the 60-day requirement, are met with respect to such contribution Amount A will be considered a rollover contribution within the meaning of section 402(c)(3) of the Code.

This ruling does not authorize the rollover of amounts that are required to be distributed by section 401(a)(9) of the Code.

This ruling supersedes the prior ruling issued to Taxpayer A on April 30, 2013.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which may be applicable thereto.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, SE:T:EP:RA:T3, at xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

Sincerely yours,

Laura B. Warshawsky, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 3

Enclosures:

Deleted Copy of letter ruling
Notice of Intention to Disclose

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.