PLR 201341030: IRS grants late-election relief for combining rental real estate activities
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The IRS granted married taxpayers 120 days to make a late election to treat all of their rental real estate interests as one rental real estate activity. The taxpayers represented that they were in a real property business and qualified for the election, but inadvertently filed their joint return without the required statement. The IRS found that the requirements for relief under section 301.9100-3 were satisfied. The ruling did not decide whether the taxpayers actually met the real-property-business or material-participation requirements.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the taxpayers make a late election to combine their rental real estate interests into one activity?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: IRC § 469(c)(7); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.469-9(g)(3), 301.9100-1, and 301.9100-3; IRC § 6110(k)(3)
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201341030
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 10/11/2013
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 469.03-00, 469.03-03,
9100.00-00
Person To Contact:
---------------------------, ID No. --------------
---------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------------------
----------------------
---------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:01
PLR-118457-13
Date:
June 24, 2013
Legend:
X = ----------------------
----------------------------------------------------
Y = --------------------
----------------------------------------------------
Year = -------
Dear ------------:
This responds to a letter dated April 16, 2013, submitted on behalf of X and Y by your authorized representative, requesting an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations for X and Y to file an election under § 469(c)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code and § 1.469-9(g)(3) of the Income Tax Regulations to treat all interests in rental real estate as a single rental real estate activity.
Facts
According to the information submitted, X and Y were married individuals who filed their tax returns jointly. X and Y represent that in Year they were in a real property business as defined by § 469 and were qualified under § 469(c)(7)(B) to make an election to treat all interests in rental real estate as a single rental real estate activity. However, X and Y inadvertently filed their joint return for Year without the statement required under § 1.469-9(g)(3).
PLR-118457-13
2
Law and Analysis
Under § 469(c)(2), the term “passive activity” generally includes any rental activity. Section 469(c)(7) provides a limited exception to this rule for taxpayers in a real property trade or business. Specifically, § 469(c)(7)(A) indicates that if a taxpayer meets the requirements of § 469(c)(7)(B), the taxpayer's rental real estate activity will no longer be presumptively passive. By its terms, the exception under § 469(c)(7)(A) is to be applied as if each interest of the taxpayer in rental real estate were a separate activity. However, a taxpayer may elect to treat all interests in rental real estate as a single activity.
Section 1.469-9(g)(3) provides that a qualifying taxpayer makes the election to treat all interests in rental real estate as a single rental real estate activity by filing a statement with the taxpayer's original income tax return for the taxable year. Section 1.469-9(g)(3) describes the information that must be contained in the statement.
Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner may grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than 6 months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines the term “regulatory election” as including an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.
Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election.
Section 301.9100-2 provides the rules governing automatic extensions of time for making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time for regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.
Section 301.9100-3 provides that requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.
Section 301.9100-3(b) provides that subject to paragraphs (b)(3)(i) through (iii) of § 301.9100-3, when a taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make the election, the taxpayer will be deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith.
PLR-118457-13
3
Conclusion
Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. As a result, X and Y are granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to make an election under § 469(c)(7)(A) to treat all their interests in rental real estate as a single rental real estate activity effective Year. The election must be in the form of the statement required by § 1.469-9(g)(3) and attached to an amended return for Year. A copy of this letter should be attached to the election. A copy is enclosed for that purpose.
Except as specifically set forth above, no opinion is expressed concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of the Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed concerning whether X and Y satisfy the requirements under § 469(c)(7)(B) or whether X and Y materially participated in any activity.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayers requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.
Sincerely,
Laura C. Fields
Laura C. Fields
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 1
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Enclosures (2):
Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace