PLR 201341022: IRS grants late consolidated-group intercompany election relief
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The IRS granted a consolidated group 45 days to file a late election under section 1.1502-13(l)(3) for certain intercompany stock transactions. The group represented that it reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional who failed to make or advise it to make the election. The IRS found that the group acted reasonably and in good faith and that relief would not prejudice the government. The extension was conditioned on the group's aggregate tax liability not being lower than it would have been if the election had been timely.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the consolidated group make a late election under section 1.1502-13(l)(3)?
- Outcome: Approved
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 351 and 6110(k)(3); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1502-13(l)(1), 1.1502-13(l)(3), and 301.9100-3
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201341022
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 10/11/2013
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 1502.13-01
Person To Contact:
----------------------
-----------------, ID No. --------------
------------------------------------------------------------ Telephone Number:
-------------
----------------------
----------------------------
Refer Reply To:
------------------------------------------- CC:CORP:2
------------------------------
PLR-113146-13
Date:
July 11, 2013
Legend
Parent = --------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
Sub 1 = -----------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
Sub 2 = ---------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
Sub 3 = -----------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Date 1 = -------------------
Date 2 = -------------------
Date 3 = ----------------------------
Company Official = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------
Tax Professional = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLR-113146-13
2
Dear --------------------:
This letter is in response to your authorized representative’s letter dated March 15, 2013, requesting an extension of time under §§ 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file an election under § 1.1502-13(l)(3) of the Income Tax Regulations (herein referred to as the “Election”). The material information in that request and in subsequent correspondence is summarized below.
Parent is the common parent of a consolidated group (“Parent Group”). At the beginning of Year 1, Parent wholly owned Sub 1 and Sub 2, and Sub 1 wholly owned Sub 3. On Date 1, Sub 1 distributed all of its Sub 3 stock to Parent in a transaction resulting in deferred intercompany gain. On Date 2, Parent contributed all of its Sub 3 stock to Sub 2 in transaction that qualified for nonrecognition treatment under § 351 of the Internal Revenue Code.
In July 1995, the Internal Revenue Service and Treasury Department published new intercompany transaction regulations under § 1.1502-13 governing the treatment of transactions between members of a consolidated group. The regulations are generally effective for transactions occurring in taxable years beginning on or after July 12, 1995. Section 1.1502-13(l)(1).
Section 1.1502-13(l)(3) of the regulations permitted taxpayers to elect to have the regulations apply to certain stock elimination transactions (i.e., those transactions described in § 1.1502-13(l)(3)(ii)) that occurred in a year to which prior law would otherwise apply. To make the election under § 1.1502-13(l)(3), taxpayers were required to include a statement making the election with their original return for the taxable year including July 12, 1995.
The Election for Parent Group was required to be filed by Date 3, but for various reasons, a valid Election was not filed. In Year 2 (which was after the due date of the Election), it was discovered that no Election was made by Parent for Parent Group.
Parent has represented that except for the transactions described in this letter, no member of Parent Group had any deferred stock gain or loss on the due date of the Election from an intercompany transaction. Parent has also represented that it is not seeking to alter a return position for which an accuracy related penalty has been or could be imposed under § 6662 at the time it requested relief (taking into account any qualified amended return filed within the meaning of § 1.6664-2(c)(3)) and for which the new return position requires or permits a regulatory election for which relief is requested.
Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the
PLR-113146-13
3
Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.
Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election. Section 301.9100-1(a). Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections. Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Section 301.9100-3(a).
In this case, the time for filing the Election is fixed by the regulations (i.e., § 1.1502- 13(l)(3)). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under § 301.9100-3 to grant an extension of time for Parent to file the Election, provided Parent shows it acted reasonably and in good faith, the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 are satisfied, and granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.
Information, affidavits, and representations submitted by Parent, Company Official, and Tax Professional explain the circumstances that resulted in the failure to timely file a valid Election. The information establishes that Parent reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional who failed to make, or advise Parent to make, the Election and that the request for relief was filed before the failure to make the Election was discovered by the Internal Revenue Service. See §§ 301.9100-3(b)(1)(i) and (v).
Based on the facts and information submitted, including the representations made, we conclude that Parent has shown it acted reasonably and in good faith, the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 are satisfied, and granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Accordingly, an extension of time is granted under
§ 301.9100-3, until 45 days from the date on this letter, for Parent to file the Election. The election must be attached to an amended return for the period including July 12, 1995.
The above extension of time is conditioned on Parent Group’s tax liability (if any) being not lower, in the aggregate, for all years to which the Election applies, than it would have been if the Election had been timely filed (taking into account the time value of money). No opinion is expressed as to the taxpayer's tax liability for the years involved. A determination thereof will be made by the applicable Director's office upon audit of the Federal income tax returns involved.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter. In particular, we express no opinion with respect to whether Parent Group qualifies substantively to make the Election.
PLR-113146-13
4
In addition, we express no opinion as to the tax consequences of filing the Election late under the provisions of any other section of the Code and regulations, or as to the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or resulting, from, filing the Election late that are not specifically set forth in this letter. For purposes of granting relief under
§ 301.9100-3, we relied on certain statements and representations made by the Parent, Company Official, and Tax Professional. However, the Director should verify all essential facts. In addition, notwithstanding that an extension is granted under
§ 301.9100-3 to file the Election, penalties and interest that would otherwise be applicable, if any, continue to apply.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the letter ruling.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, copies of this letter are being sent to your authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
Ken Cohen
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace