PLR 201340008: IRS permits a retroactive qualified electing fund election for a PFIC investment

Number
201340008
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Retroactive Elections
Code sections
§ 1295, § 1297, § 6110
Ruling dated
June 4, 2013
Publicly released
October 4, 2013

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2013
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS consented to a taxpayer's retroactive election to treat a passive foreign investment company as a qualified electing fund. The taxpayer had relied on an accounting firm for tax advice and did not know that the foreign company was a PFIC or that a QEF election was available. The taxpayer discovered the issue during tax due diligence connected with a planned public offering and provided affidavits describing the failure and the professional's role. The consent was conditioned on following the timing and procedural rules for making the retroactive election.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayer make a retroactive QEF election after reasonably relying on a tax professional and discovering the PFIC status later?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1295(a), 1295(b), 1297(a), and 6110(k)(3); Treas. Reg. § 1.1295-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201340008
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 10/4/2013
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1295.02-02
Person To Contact:
--------------------------
--------------------, ID No. -----------------
-----------------------------------
Telephone Number:
------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------
----------------------------
Refer Reply To:
------------------------------
CC:INTL:B02
PLR-137867-12
Date:
June 04, 2013

Legend

Shareholder = ----------------------------------------------------- EIN = ----------------

FC = ----------------------------------

Accounting Firm A = ----------------------------------

Country 1 = -----------
Country 2 = ------------

State = -------------

Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Year 6 = -------
Year 8 = -------

Dear ---- ----------:

This is in response to a letter dated August 29, 2012 submitted by your authorized representative that requested the consent of the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (“Commissioner”) for Shareholder to make a retroactive qualified electing fund (“QEF”) election under section 1295(b) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f) with respect to Shareholder’s investment in FC.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations submitted on behalf of Shareholder by its authorized representative, and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office

PLR-137867-12
2

has not verified any of the material submitted in support of this request for ruling, such material is subject to verification on examination. The information submitted in the request is substantially as set forth below.

FACTS

Shareholder is limited liability partnership organized in State. FC is an entity organized under the laws of Country 1 that is treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. FC qualified as a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) as defined in section 1297(a) of the Code in Year 1.

During Year 1 and Year 2, Shareholder acquired shares of FC indirectly through its interest in two Country 2 partnerships.

Shareholder retained Accounting Firm A to prepare its Year 1 through Year 6 tax return. Accounting Firm A employs experienced tax professionals and advised Shareholder with regard to the U.S. federal income tax matters regarding Shareholder’s operations and investments, including Shareholder’s investment in FC. Shareholder relied on Accounting Firm A to provide advice with respect to filing and reporting requirements in general, as well as any elections or statements that would be necessary to elect a specific tax treatment.

Shareholder did not know or have reason to know that FC was a PFIC or that it, as indirect owner of the shares of FC, was eligible to make an election to treat FC as a QEF. Accounting Firm A did not advise Shareholder of the availability of electing to treat FC as a PFIC.

In Year 8, Shareholder learned that there would be an initial public offering of FC. Shareholder analyzed FC for tax purposes as part of the tax due diligence for the sale of a foreign security. As part of that review, Shareholder determined that FC was a PFIC. Based on that determination, Shareholder requested Accounting Firm A to prepare a request to make a retroactive QEF election.

Shareholder has submitted affidavits, under penalties of perjury, that describe the events that led to its failure to make a QEF election with respect to FC by the election due date, including the role of Accounting Firm A.

Shareholder represents that, as of the date of this request for ruling, the PFIC status of FC has not been raised by the IRS on audit for any of the taxable years at issue.

RULING REQUESTED

Shareholder requests the consent of the Commissioner to make a retroactive QEF election with respect to FC for Year 1 under Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f).

PLR-137867-12
3

LAW

Section 1295(a) provides that a PFIC will be treated as a QEF with respect to a shareholder if (1) an election by the shareholder under section 1295(b) applies to the PFIC for the taxable year; and (2) the PFIC complies with the requirements prescribed by the Secretary for purposes of determining the ordinary earnings and net capital gains of the company.

Under section 1295(b)(2), a QEF election may be made for a taxable year at any time on or before the due date (determined with regard to extensions) for filing the return for the taxable year. To the extent provided in regulations, the election may be made after the due date if the shareholder failed to make an election by the due date because the shareholder reasonably believed the company was not a PFIC.

Under Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f), a shareholder may request the consent of the Commissioner to make a retroactive QEF election for a taxable year if:

1. the shareholder reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, within the meaning of Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f)(2);
2. granting consent will not prejudice the interests of the United States government, as provided in Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f)(3);
3. the request is made before a representative of the Internal Revenue Service raises upon audit the PFIC status of the company for any taxable year of the shareholder; and
4. the shareholder satisfies the procedural requirements of Treas. Reg. §1.1295- 3(f)(4).

Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f)(3)(ii) provides that, if granting relief would prejudice the interests of the U.S. government, the Commissioner may grant consent to make a section 1295 election provided the shareholder enters into a closing agreement that requires the shareholder to pay an amount sufficient to eliminate any prejudice to the U.S. government as a consequence of the shareholder’s inability to file amended returns for closed taxable years.

Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(g)(1)(i)(B) provides that, if the Commissioner grants consent to file a retroactive QEF election, the election is due on the due date, as extended, for the shareholder’s return for the taxable year in which consent is granted.

The procedural requirements include filing a request for consent to make a retroactive election with, and submitting a user fee to, the Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (International). Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f)(4)(i). Additionally, affidavits signed under penalties of perjury must be submitted that describe:

1. the events that led to the failure to make a QEF election by the election due date;

PLR-137867-12
4

2. the discovery of the failure;
3. the engagement and responsibilities of the qualified tax professional; and 4. the extent to which the shareholder relied on the professional.

Treas. Reg. §§1.1295-3(f)(4)(ii) and (iii).

CONCLUSION

Based on the information submitted and representations made with Shareholder’s ruling request, we conclude that Shareholder has satisfied Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f). Accordingly, consent is granted to Shareholder to make a retroactive QEF election with respect to FC for Year 1, provided that Shareholder complies with the rules under Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(g) regarding the time and manner for making the retroactive QEF election.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter.

This private letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter ruling is being sent to your authorized representative.

A copy of this letter ruling must be attached to any federal income tax return to which it is relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the letter ruling.

Sincerely,

Jeffery G. Mitchell
Branch Chief, Branch 2
(International)

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace