Determination 1338059: IRS revokes exemption after organization funded private professional-association event

Plain-English summary

The IRS issued a final adverse determination revoking an organization’s exemption under section 501(c)(3), effective November 30, 2009. The organization’s reported activity was funding an annual event for a professional association, including expenses connected with a select gathering for judges and association members. The IRS concluded that the organization did not primarily conduct activities serving an exempt purpose and that more than an insubstantial part of its activities furthered a non-exempt purpose. Contributions to the organization were therefore not deductible, and the organization was directed to file Form 1120 for the stated periods and later years. The organization waived its right to contest the determination by executing Form 906.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: Did the organization qualify for exemption under IRC § 501(c)(3)?
• Outcome: Revocation. The IRS revoked the organization’s exempt status effective November 30, 2009.
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 501(c)(3), 170, 507, 7428; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1), (c)(1), (c)(2), (d)(ii), and (e)(1)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury

Appeals Office . .
3310 El Camino Avenue Suite 170 Taxpayer Identification Number:
Sacramento CA 95821-6318
Number: 201338059 Person to Contact:
Release Date: 9/20/2013
Tel: : _
Fax:
Date: June 24, 2013
Tax Period(s) Ended:
Form Number
B
Certified Mail UIL: 501.03-00
Dear

This is a final adverse determination regarding your exempt status under section
501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”). It is determined that you do not
qualify as exempt from Federal income tax under section 501(c)(3) of the Code effective
November 30, 2009. .

The revocation of your exempt status was made for the following reason(s):

You did not engage primarily in activities which accomplish one or more of the exempt
purposes specified in IRC 501(c) (3) and Treas. Reg. 1.501(c) (3)-1(c) (1). More than
an insubstantial part of your activities was in furtherance of a non-exempt purpose.

Contributions to your organization are not deductible under section 170 of the Code.

You are required to file Federal income tax returns on Form 1120 for the tax periods
Stated in the heading of this letter and for all tax years thereafter. File your return with
the appropriate Internal Revenue Service Center per the instructions of the return. For
further instructions, forms, and information please visit www. irs.gov.

If you were a private foundation as of the effective date of revocation, you are
considered to be taxable private foundation until you terminate your private foundation
status under section 507 of the Code. In addition to your income tax return, you must
also continue to file Form 990-PF by the 15th Day of the fifth month after the end of your
annual accounting period.

You have waived your right to contest this determination under the declaratory judgment
provisions of Section 7428 of the Code by your execution of Form 906, Closing
Agreement Concerning Specific Matters, an executed copy of which is being sent to you
under separate cover.

If you have any questions, please contact the person whose name and telephone
number are shown in the heading of this letter.

Sincerely Yours,

[illegible signature]

Nan Shimizu
Appeals Team Manager

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
1100 Commerce Street
Dallas, TX 75242

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES

DIVISION MAR i 9 2012

Taxpayer Identification Number:

ORG Form:
ADDRESS
Tax Year(s) Ended:

Person to Contact/ID Number:

Contact Numbers:
Telephone:
Fax:

Certified Mail - Return Receipt Requested

Dear ‘

We have enclosed a copy of our report of examination explaining why we believe
revocation of your exempt status under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code
(Code) is necessary.

If you accept our findings, take no further action. We will issue a final revocation letter.

If you do not agree with our proposed revocation, you must submit to us a written
request for Appeals Office consideration within 30 days from the date of this letter to
protest our decision. Your protest should include a statement of the facts, the
applicable law, and arguments in support of your position.

An Appeals officer will review your case. The Appeals office is independent of the
Director, EO Examinations. The Appeals Office resolves most disputes informally and
promptly. The enclosed Publication 3498, The Examination Process, and Publication
892, Exempt Organizations Appeal Procedures for Unagreed Issues, explain how to
appeal an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) decision. Publication 3498 also includes
information on your rights as a taxpayer and the IRS collection process.

You may also request that we refer this matter for technical advice as explained in
Publication 892. If we issue a determination letter to you based on technical advice, no
further administrative appeal is available to you within the IRS regarding the issue that
was the subject of the technical advice.

Letter 3618 (04-2002)
Catalog Number 34809F

If we do not hear from you within 30 days from the date of this letter, we will process
your case based on the recommendations shown in the report of examination. If you do
not protest this proposed determination within 30 days from the date of this letter, the
IRS will consider it to be a failure to exhaust your available administrative remedies.
Section 7428(b)(2) of the Code provides, in part: "A declaratory judgment or decree
under this section shall not be issued in any proceeding unless the Tax Court, the
Claims Court, or the District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia
determines that the organization involved has exhausted its administrative remedies
within the Internal Revenue Service." We will then issue a final revocation letter. We
will also notify the appropriate state officials of the revocation in accordance with section
6104(c) of the Code.

You have the right to contact the office of the Taxpayer Advocate. Taxpayer Advocate
assistance is not a substitute for established IRS procedures, such as the formal
appeals process. The Taxpayer Advocate cannot reverse a legally correct tax
determination, or extend the time fixed by law that you have to file a petition in a United
States court. The Taxpayer Advocate can, however, see that a tax matter that may not
have been resolved through normal channels gets prompt and proper handling. You
may call toll-free 1-877-777-4778 and ask for Taxpayer Advocate Assistance. If you
prefer, you may contact your local Taxpayer Advocate at:

If you have any questions, please call the contact person at the telephone number
shown in the heading of this letter. If you write, please provide a telephone number and
the most convenient time to call if we need to contact you.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Sincerely,

Nanette M. Downing
Director, EO Examinations

Enclosures:
Publication 892
Publication 3498
886-A

Letter 3618 (04-2002)
Catalog Number 34809F

• , Schedule number or exhibit
  Form 886-A EXPLANATION OF ITEMS
  (Rev. January 1994) 1
  Name of taxpayer Tax Identification number | Year/period ended
  ORG 11/30/20XX

EIN
LEGEND
ORG - Organization name EIN - ein XX - Date City ~- city State - state
Event - event POA - poa RA-1 - 1st RA CO-1 - 1st COMPANY
ISSUE

1. Whether ORG (ORG) is organized and operated exclusively for section 501(c)(3) exempt
   purposes and if found not what would be the effective date of revocation.

FACTS

ORG was incorporated and filed articles of incorporation in the state of State on January 3rd 20XX. In
our letter dated June 30, 20XX ORG began operating under an advance ruling as an organization
exempt under section 501(c)(3) and not a private foundation within the meaning of section 509(a)(2). The
advance ruling period ended November 30, 20XX. On Form 990 for the tax year that ended November
30, 20XX ORG selected foundation status 509(a)(3). They did not complete the Support Schedule as
required for organizations exempt under foundation status 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) or 509(a)(2).

According to Form 1023, Application for Recognition of Exemption under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code, the ORG was formed to support CO-1 (CO-1), of City,, State, an organization exempt
from federal income taxation under Section 501(a) as an organization organized exclusively for purposes
within the meaning of Section 501(c)(6). ORG will support CO-1 by engaging in charitable, educational
and scientific activities related to CO-1’s profession (i.e., patent, trademark, copyright, unfair competition
and other intellectual property law), by offering educational seminars and conferences, and potentially by
publishing continuing education materials and funding research grants and scholarships.

ORG’s Form 990 for the tax year that ended November 30, 20XX reported $$.00 on line 1: contributions,
gifts, grants, and similar amounts received and $52.00 interest income. Out of $$, % of the total revenue
came from $ (CO-1), an organization exempt under Section 501(c)(6) of the internal revenue code.

Organizations recognized as exempt under section 501(c)(6) provides for the exemption of business
leagues, chambers of commerce, real estate boards, boards of trade, and professional football leagues
(whether or not administering a pension fund for football players), which are not organized for profit and
no part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual.

During the initial interview, which was conducted on June 24, 20XX with ORG’s Power of Attorney
(POA), POA, he explained their activities. The POA stated that the sole purpose of ORG is to fund the
Event. The Event is an annual event for the CO-1. It is a way to show the appreciation to the Judges.
The Event is also an event that furthers the CO-1’s mission of Education, Service, and Community. This
function took place at the RA-1 United States Court Houses in City, on Friday May 1, 20XX. The Event is
for a select crowd including the judges and CO-1’s members. The members of the public were not
invited. Non-CO-1 members are also welcome to attend for non-member prices. As part of the Event,
CO-1 incurs expenses such as a fee to the courthouse to use the property for the event, expense
reimbursements for travel usually to judges, catering, room rental, and etc. CO-1 tallies the expenses,
transfer the money to ORG and has ORG to make the payments. According to the POA, ORG does not

Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page 1 publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

, , Schedule number or exhibit
Form 886-A EXPLANATION OF ITEMS
(Rev. January 1994) 1
Name of taxpayer Tax Identification number | Year/period ended
ORG 11/30/20XX

EIN

carry out any other activities throughout year, but to support the CO-1’s activities, which is the annual
Event.

LAW

Section 501(c)(3) of the Code provides for the exemption from federal income tax of organizations
organized and operated exclusively for religious, charitable, or educational purposes so long as no part
of the organization's net earnings inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual. If an
organization fails to meet either the organizational test or the operational test, it is not exempt.

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that in order to be exempt as an
organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Code, an organization must be both organized and
operated exclusively for one or more of the purposes specified in such section.

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1) of the regulations provides that an organization will be regarded as “operated
exclusively” for one or more exempt purposes only if it engages primarily in activities which accomplish
one or more of such exempt purposes specified in section 501(c)(3) of the Code. An organization will not
be so regarded if more than an insubstantial part of its activities is not in furtherance of any exempt
purpose.

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(2) of the regulations provides that an organization is not operated exclusively for
one or more exempt purposes if its net earnings inure in whole or in part to the benefit of private
shareholders or individuals.

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(ii) of the regulations states that an organization is not organized or operated for
one or more exempt purposes unless it serves a public rather than a private interest. Accordingly, it is
necessary for an organization to establish that it is not organized or operated for the benefit of private
interests such as designated individuals, the creator, shareholders, or persons controlled, directly or
indirectly, by such private interests.

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(e)(1) of the regulations provides that an organization may meet the requirements of
section 501(c)(3) if the Code although it operates a trade or business as a substantial part of its activities,
if the operation of such trade or business is in furtherance of the organization’s exempt purpose or
purposes and if the organization is not organized or operated for the primary purpose of carrying on an
unrelated trade or business, as defined in section 513 of the Code. In determining the existence or
nonexistence of such primary purpose, all the circumstances must be considered, including the size and
extent of the trade or business and the size and extent of the activities which are in furtherance of one or
more exempt purposes.

Harding Hospital, Inc. v. United States, 505 F2d 1068 (1974) [74-2 USTC 99816], holds that an
organization seeking a ruling as to recognition of its tax exempt status has the burden of proving that it
satisfies the requirements of the particular exemption statute. Whether an organization has satisfied the
operational test is a question of fact. See also Christian Stewardship Assistance, Inc. v. Commissioner,
69 [70] T.C. 1037, 1042 (1978) [CCH Dec. 35,422].

Better Business Bureau v. United States, 316 U.S. 279 (1945), holds that the existence of a single non-
exempt purpose, if substantial in nature, will destroy the exemption under section 501(c)(3). An

Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page 2 _publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-internal Revenue Service

‘ . Schedule number or exhibit
Form 886-A EXPLANATION OF ITEMS
(Rev. January 1994) 1
Name of taxpayer Tax Identification number | Year/period ended
ORG 11/30/20XX
EIN

organization will be regarded as operated exclusively for one or more exempt purposes only if it engages
primarily in activities which accomplish one or more of such purposes.

TAXPAYER’S POSITION
Organization disagreed with government's position and appeal case.

GOVERNMENT’S POSITION

An organization exempt under section 501(c)(3) must be organized and operated exclusively for
religious, charitable, or educational purposes so long as no part of the organization's net earnings inures
to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual.

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(ii) of the regulations states that an organization is not organized or operated for
one or more exempt purposes unless it serves a public rather than a private interest. Accordingly, it is
necessary for an organization to establish that it is not organized or operated for the benefit of private
interests such as designated individuals, the creator, shareholders, or persons controlled, directly or
indirectly, by such private interests.

ORG does not qualify for exemption under section 501(c)(3) of the code because it fails to operate for a
purpose described under section 501(c)(3) of the code. The sole purpose of the organization is to
support CO-1 an organization exempt under section 501(c)(6) of the code. Organizations exempt under
section 501(C)(6) serve the private interest of its members and not the general public

Organizations exempt under section 501(c)(3) must serve a public rather than private interest . Not only
does the Judge’s dinner not serve a purpose described under section 501(c)(3) of the code but it is also
for a select crowd and not the general public. Non-CO-1 members are also welcome to attend for non-
member prices

It is the government's position that ORG did not engage in any in charitable, educational and scientific
activities related to CO-1’s profession by offering educational seminars and conferences, and potentially
by publishing continuing education materials and funding research grants and scholarships as stated on
Form 1023. Instead its only activity consisted of supporting the annual Event. The Event does not serve
a purpose described under IRC section 501(c)(3).

An organization will not be so regarded as operating exclusively for charitable purposes if more than an
insubstantial part of its activities is not in furtherance of an exempt purpose. In the fundamental case of
Better Business Bureau of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. United States, supra, the Court concluded that the
presence of a single nonexempt purpose, if substantial in nature, would preclude exemption regardless
of the number or importance of statutorily exempt purposes.

CONCLUSION

ORG is not organized and operated exclusively for one or more of the purposes specified in section
501(c)(3) of the Code. It is our conclusion that they never operated within the meaning of section
501(c)(3) of the code and hence should be revoked effective December 01, 20XX.

Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page 3 _publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-internal Revenue Service