PLR 1338021: IRS grants a consolidated group more time to provide Form 3115 copies
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A consolidated group filed Form 3115 to change its accounting method for amortizable bond premium while one group member had two refund suits pending. The group sent a duplicate form to government counsel in one suit but mistakenly believed that counsel in the second suit would forward the form, and the second copy was sent later. The IRS found that the requirements for relief under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 were satisfied and granted an extension of time, concluding that the taxpayers had met the duplicate-copy requirement in Rev. Proc. 97-27. The ruling did not decide whether the taxpayers otherwise qualified to make the accounting-method change.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May the consolidated group receive more time to provide duplicate Form 3115 copies to government counsel under Rev. Proc. 97-27?
- Outcome: Approved, extension granted.
- Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3; Rev. Proc. 97-27; IRC § 6110.
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201338021 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 9/20/2013 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.00-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------------------ --------------------------, ID No. ----------------
--------------------------- -----------------
---------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------- ----------------------
-------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:FIP:1
PLR-117785-13
Date:
June 18, 2013
Legend:
Parent = -----------------------------------------
S1 = ----------------------------------------------
S2 = ------------------------------------------------------------
Month = -----------
Year = -------
Date 1 = ---------------------------
Date 2 = ------------------------
Date 3 = ------------------------
Date 4 = ------------------------
Dear ------------------:
This ruling responds to a letter dated April 12, 2013, filed by Parent on behalf of
its consolidated group members, S1 and S2 (collectively, “Taxpayers”). Taxpayers
request an extension of time pursuant to sections 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the
Procedure and Administration Regulations to file a duplicate copy of a signed Form
PLR-117785-13 2
3115, Application for Change in Accounting Method, for the taxable year ending Date 1,
with government counsel pursuant to section 6.03 of Rev. Proc. 97-27.
Facts:
On Date 2, Parent, on behalf of Taxpayers, executed and filed with the IRS
National Office a Form 3115 to change its method of accounting for amortizable bond
premium. At the time the Form 3115 was submitted, S1 was a party to two pending
refund suits before the federal courts. Pursuant to section 6.03 of Rev. Proc. 97-27,
Taxpayers should have sent duplicate copies of the Form 3115 to both sets of
government counsel. On Date 3, Taxpayers sent a copy of the Form 3115 to their legal
counsel representing them in one of the refund suits (Counsel 1). Counsel 1 sent a
copy of the Form 3115 to the government counsel for that refund suit and to a second
legal counsel representing Taxpayers in the second refund suit (Counsel 2). Taxpayers
believed that Counsel 2 would forward a copy of the Form 3115 to the government
counsel for the second refund suit. On Date 4, Counsel 2 discovered that he failed to
forward a copy of the Form 3115 to the government counsel in the second refund suit
and sent a copy of the Form 3115 to the government counsel. Upon learning that the
duplicate copy was provided to one set of government counsel on Date 3 and the other
set of counsel on Date 4, Taxpayers submitted this request for relief under sections
301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3.1
Law and Analysis:
Rev. Proc. 97-27 sets forth the general procedures for obtaining the advance
consent of the IRS to change a method of accounting. A taxpayer otherwise within the
scope of Rev. Proc. 97-27 that is before a federal court with respect to any income tax
issue may request a change in method of accounting. Section 6.03 of Rev. Proc. 97-27
requires such taxpayer to provide a copy of the IRS Form 3115 to counsel for the
government no later than the date the taxpayer files the original IRS Form 3115 with the
IRS National Office.
Under section 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner has discretion to grant a
reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in sections 301.9100-2 and
301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines a regulatory
election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in the
Federal Register, or a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement
published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.
Section 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner
will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election. Section
1
The government counsel in the second refund suit who received the duplicate copy of the Form 3115 on
Date 4 has been informed about this private letter ruling requesting 9100 relief and has no objections to
its issuance.
PLR-117785-13 3
301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making regulatory elections that do not meet
the requirements for an automatic extension under section 301.9100-2.
Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief under section 301.9100-3
will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of
the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that
granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.
Conclusion:
Based solely on the facts and representations submitted, we conclude that the
requirements of section 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Accordingly, Taxpayers are
granted an extension of time to provide the additional copy of the Form 3115 to
government counsel. Because such additional copy was provided on Date 3 and Date
4, Taxpayers have satisfied the requirements of section 6.03 of Rev. Proc. 97-27 with
respect to its Form 3115 filed on Date 2.
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by Taxpayers and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the materials submitted
in support of the request for rulings, such material is subject to verification on
examination.
Except as expressly set forth above, we express no opinion concerning the tax
consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of the Code.
Specifically, we express no opinion as to whether Taxpayers qualify to make their
change in accounting method under the provisions of Rev. Proc. 2011-14. Nor do we
express any opinion as to whether Taxpayers have changed to an appropriate method
of accounting.
This ruling is directed only to the Taxpayers requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of
the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-117785-13 4
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this
letter is being sent to your authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
__________________________________
Andrea M. Hoffenson
Assistant to the Branch Chief, Branch 1
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Financial Institutions and Products)
Enclosures:
Copy of this letter
Copy for section 6110 purposes
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.