PLR 1337013: IRS permits revocation of elections not to claim bonus depreciation

Plain-English summary

An S corporation that operated ice vending machines asked to revoke elections not to deduct additional first-year depreciation for qualifying property placed in service in two redacted tax years. The elections covered 50-percent additional depreciation for specified seven-year and fifteen-year property and 100-percent additional depreciation for specified fifteen-year property. The taxpayer said it had not known that its majority shareholder needed the deductions to offset other income. The IRS granted 60 days to revoke the elections by written statements filed with amended returns, subject to attaching a copy of the ruling.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: May the taxpayer revoke its elections not to deduct additional first-year depreciation?
• Outcome: Approved, with a 60-day filing procedure.
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 168(k)(1), 168(k)(2), 168(k)(5), and 6110(k)(3); Treas. Reg. § 1.168(k)-1(e)(7)(i).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201337013 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 9/13/2013 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 168.36-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------------------------ ------------------, ID No. ------------------
----------------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------ ----------------------
---------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:7
PLR-153547-12
Date:
May 22, 2013

Re: Request to revoke the election not to deduct the additional first year depreciation

Taxpayer = -----------------------------------------------------------
A = ---------------------------
B = ---------------------------
SB/SE Official = ----------------------------------------------------

Dear ----------------:

  This letter responds to a letter dated December 12, 2012, and supplemental

correspondence, requesting the consent of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to
revoke Taxpayer’s elections not to deduct the additional first year depreciation that were
made on its federal tax returns for the taxable years ended A and B.

FACTS

     Taxpayer represents that the facts are as follows:

  Taxpayer is an S-corporation with a calendar year-end. Taxpayer is engaged in

the business of retail sales of ice to the public using ice vending machines.

   On its timely filed federal tax return for the taxable year ended A, Taxpayer made

an election not to deduct the 50-percent additional first year depreciation under §
168(k)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code for all 7-year and 15-year property placed in
service during that taxable year. On its timely filed federal tax return for the taxable
year ended B, Taxpayer made an election not to deduct the 100-percent additional first
year depreciation under § 168(k)(5) for all 15-year property placed in service during that
taxable year.

  At the time Taxpayer filed its federal tax returns for the taxable years ended A and

B, Taxpayer was not aware that its majority shareholder needed Taxpayer to flow-
through the additional first year depreciation deduction to offset other income on that

PLR-153547-12 2

individual’s federal income tax returns for the taxable years ended A and B. If Taxpayer
was made aware of this situation before Taxpayer filed its federal tax returns for the
taxable years ended A and B, Taxpayer would have claimed the additional first year
depreciation deduction for the qualified property placed in service in the taxable years
ended A and B.

RULING REQUESTED

    Taxpayer requests to revoke its election not to deduct the 50-percent additional

first year depreciation for qualified property that is 7-year or 15-year property placed in
service during the taxable year ended A, and its election not to deduct the 100-percent
additional first year depreciation for qualified property that is 15-year property placed in
service during the taxable year ended B.

LAW

  Section 168(k)(1)(A) allows a 50-percent additional first year depreciation

deduction for the taxable year in which qualified property (as defined in § 168(k)(2)) is
placed in service by a taxpayer.

   Section 168(k)(5) provides that in the case of qualified property acquired by the

taxpayer (under rules similar to the rules of § 168(k)(2)(A)(ii) and (iii)) after September
8, 2010, and before January 1, 2012, and which is placed in service by the taxpayer
before January 1, 2012 (before January 1, 2013, in the case of property described in §
168(k)(2)(B) or (C)), a 100-percent additional first year depreciation deduction for the
taxable year in which such qualified property is placed in service by the taxpayer is
allowable.

  Section 3.01 of Rev. Proc. 2011-26, 2011-16 I.R.B. 664, provides that

depreciable property is eligible for the 100-percent additional first year depreciation
deduction if the property is qualified property (as defined in § 168(k)(2)) and also meets
the additional requirements in section 3.02 of Rev. Proc. 2011-26. Further, section 3.01
of Rev. Proc. 2011-26 provides that rules similar to the rules in § 1.168(k)-1 of the
Income Tax Regulations for “qualified property” or for “30-percent additional first year
depreciation deduction” apply.

   Section 168(k)(2)(D)(iii) provides that a taxpayer may elect not to deduct the

additional first year depreciation for any class of property placed in service during the
taxable year. The term “class of property” is defined in § 1.168(k)-1(e)(2) as meaning,
in general, each class of property described in § 168(e) (for example, 5-year property).

    Section 1.168(k)-1(e)(7)(i) provides that an election not to deduct the additional

first year depreciation for a class of property that is qualified property placed in service
during the taxable year is revocable only with the prior written consent of the

PLR-153547-12 3

Commissioner of Internal Revenue. To seek the Commissioner’s consent, the taxpayer
must submit a request for a letter ruling.

CONCLUSIONS

   Based solely on the facts and representations submitted, we conclude that a

revocation of Taxpayer’s election not to deduct the 50-percent additional first year
depreciation for qualified property that is 7-year or 15-year property placed in service by
Taxpayer in the taxable year ended A, and a revocation of Taxpayer’s election not to
deduct the 100-percent additional first year depreciation for qualified property that is 15-
year property placed in service by Taxpayer in the taxable year ended B, is permitted
under § 1.168(k)-1(e)(7)(i). Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted 60 calendar days from the
date of this letter to revoke its election not to deduct the additional first year depreciation
for qualified property that is 7-year or 15-year property placed in service by Taxpayer in
the taxable year ended A, and for qualified property that is 15-year property placed in
service by Taxpayer in the taxable year ended B. The revocation must be made in a
written statement filed with Taxpayer’s amended federal tax returns for the taxable
years ended A and B. In addition, a copy of this letter must be attached to such
amended returns. A copy is enclosed for that purpose.

   Except as specifically ruled upon above, no opinion is expressed or implied

concerning the tax consequences of the facts described above under any other
provisions of the Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed or implied on: (1) whether
any item of depreciable property placed in service by Taxpayer in the taxable years
ended A and B is eligible for the additional first year depreciation deduction under §
168(k)(1) or § 168(k)(5); or (2) the propriety of Taxpayer’s determination of the class of
property for any item of depreciable property placed in service by Taxpayer in the
taxable years ended A and B.

   This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)

provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

PLR-153547-12 4

 In accordance with the power of attorney, we are sending a copy of this letter to

Taxpayer’s authorized representative. We are also sending a copy of this letter to the
SB/SE Official.

                                    Sincerely,

                                    Kathleen Reed

                                    Kathleen Reed
                                    Branch Chief, Branch 7
                                    Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                    (Income Tax and Accounting)

Enclosures (2)
6110 copy
Copy of this letter