Private Letter Ruling 1337008 Released September 13, 2013 Approved

PLR 1337008: Taxpayer receives more time to elect Canadian RRSP deferral

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2013
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A Canadian-born taxpayer who became a U.S. permanent resident asked for more time to elect deferral of U.S. tax on income in two Canadian RRSP accounts. The taxpayer had withdrawn RRSP funds under a divorce-court order to pay legal fees and had paid related Canadian tax. The IRS granted 60 days from the ruling date to make the election under Rev. Proc. 2002-23. The taxpayer was required to file amended returns and Forms 8891 for each RRSP and later years through the year of final distribution.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the taxpayer make a late election to defer U.S. tax on income in the Canadian RRSP accounts?
  • Outcome: Approved, with a 60-day filing period and information-return conditions.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3; Rev. Proc. 2002-23; Article VIII of the U.S.-Canada income tax treaty.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201337008 [Third Party Communication:
Release Date: 9/13/2013 Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Index Number: 9100.22-00, 9114.03-06
Person To Contact:
---------------------------- ---------------------, ID No. ------------------
--------------------------- Telephone Number:
----------------------------------- ----------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:BR1
PLR-127728-12
Date:
May 31, 2013

              TY:---------------

Legend

Taxpayer = -----------------------------

RRSP 1 = ------------------------

RRSP 2 = ------------------------

Year 1 = -------

Year 2 = -------

Year 3 = -------

Year 4 = -------

Year 5 = -------

State = --------------

Tax Years = ---------------

Dear -----------------:

PLR-127728-12 2

This is in reply to a letter dated May 28, 2012, requesting an extension of time under
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 for Taxpayer to elect the provisions of Rev. Proc. 2002-23,
2002-1 C.B. 744, for Tax Years.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by
an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in
support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

FACTS

Taxpayer was born in Canada. While he lived and worked in Canada he established
RRSP 1 and RRSP 2. In Year 1, Taxpayer’s employer moved him to State to work at a
U.S. affiliate. In Year 2, Taxpayer applied for a green card and became a permanent
U.S. resident in Year 3.

In Year 4, Taxpayer filed for divorce in State and the Court ordered him to withdraw
funds from his RRSP accounts sufficient to pay the attorneys fees and costs associated
with the divorce proceeding. Taxpayer withdrew the funds, paid the attorneys’ fees and
costs, and paid the related income tax to Canada. In Year 5, while preparing his Year 4
U.S. income tax return, his tax advisor first informed him of the need to make an
election for U.S. tax purposes to defer recognition of income on RRSP 1 and RRSP 2.
The taxpayer made an estimated U.S. federal income tax payment taking into
consideration the RRSP distribution and requested an extension of time to make the
election under Rev. Proc. 2002-23 pursuant to Article VIII(8) of the U.S.-Canada income
tax treaty (the “Treaty”). Taxpayer had timely filed all his U.S. returns beginning in Year
1 and at the time of this ruling request, the Internal Revenue Service had not contacted
him regarding the RRSP accounts.

RULING REQUESTED

Whether Taxpayer may receive an extension of time under Treas. Reg. §301.9100-3 to
elect the provisions of Rev. Proc. 2002-23, 2002-1 C.B. 744, for Tax Years.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a
taxpayer a reasonable extension of time, under the rules set forth in Treas. Reg. §
301.9100-3, to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue
Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100 -1(b) provides that an election includes an application for relief
in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is

PLR-127728-12 3

prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or
announcement.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will
be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that
the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice
the interests of the Government.

In the present situation, the election provided in Rev. Proc. 2002-23 is a regulatory
election within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(b). Therefore, the
Commissioner has discretionary authority under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100–1(c) to grant
Taxpayers an extension of time, provided that Taxpayers satisfy the standards set forth
in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a).

Based solely on the information submitted and representations made, we conclude that
Taxpayer satisfies the standards of Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3. Accordingly, Taxpayer is
granted an extension of time until 60 days from the date of this ruling letter to make an
election for Tax Years under Rev. Proc. 2002-23. As provided in Treas. Reg.
§ 301.9100-1(a), the granting of an extension of time is not a determination that
Taxpayers are otherwise eligible to make the above-described election.

Pursuant to section 4.07 of Rev. Proc. 2002-23, the election once made cannot be
revoked except with the consent of the Commissioner. For each open Tax Year,
Taxpayer must file Form 1040X (Amended U.S. Individual Income Tax Return), and
attach a Form 8891 (U.S. Information Return for Beneficiaries of Certain Canadian
Registered Retirement Plans) for each RRSP. For each subsequent tax year through
the tax year in which the final distribution is made from an RRSP, Taxpayer must attach
a Form 8891 for the RRSP to his U.S. income tax return.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.

This letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayers who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter will be sent to
your authorized representative.

PLR-127728-12 4

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of this
letter ruling.

                                              Sincerely,


                                              Elizabeth U. Karzon
                                              Chief, Branch 1, CC:INTL:Br1
                                              Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                              (International)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.