PLR 1337001: IRS grants inadvertent S election termination relief
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An S corporation implemented an employee equity compensation arrangement through a newly formed entity and an amended operating agreement that created a new class of stock. The corporation later revoked that agreement and adopted a replacement. The IRS concluded that the resulting termination of the corporation's S election was inadvertent under section 1362(f). The corporation would continue to be treated as an S corporation from the termination date, provided it otherwise remained eligible and the election was not terminated for another reason.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Was the corporation's S election termination caused by the equity compensation arrangement inadvertent?
- Outcome: Approved, with continued S corporation treatment subject to the stated conditions.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361 and 1362(d) and (f); Treas. Reg. § 1.1361-1(l).
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201337001 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 9/13/2013 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.02-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------------------------- -----------------------------, ID No. -------------
----------------------- -----------------
--------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
--------------------------------- ----------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:02
PLR-103878-13
Date:
May 28, 2013
Legend
X = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------
State = ---------
Date 1 = ------------------------
Date 2 = --------------------------
Date 3 = ----------------------
Dear -----------------:
This responds to a letter dated January 17, 2013, and subsequent correspondence,
submitted on behalf of X by its authorized representative, requesting inadvertent
termination relief under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.
The information submitted states that X was formed in State on Date 1. X made an
election to be treated as an association taxable as an S corporation under § 1362
effective Date 1. X’s management decided to implement an equity-based compensation
plan for its employees in the form of a grant of traditional profits interests in X. Rather
than grant profits interests in X directly to its employees, X decided to grant one profits
interest to a newly formed entity and grant membership interests in that entity to X’s
employees. The members of X executed a Second Amended and Restated Limited
Liability Company Operating agreement effective Date 2 creating a new class of stock
implementing the equity-based compensation profits plan.
The new class member did not make a capital contribution to X nor did the new class
member receive distributions from X. On Date 3, X executed an agreement revoking
the Second Amended and Restated Agreement. Also on Date 3, the members
executed a Third Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Operating
Agreement.
PLR-103878-13 2
X represents that at all relevant times, X and its shareholders treated X as an S
corporation and filed their tax returns accordingly. X and its shareholders have agreed
to make any adjustments the Commissioner may require consistent with the treatment
of X as an S corporation.
Section 1361(a) provides that the term “S corporation” means, with respect to any
taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is in
effect for the year.
Section 1361(b) provides that the term “small business corporation” means a domestic
corporation which is not an ineligible corporation and which does not (A) have more
than 100 shareholders, (b) have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, a trust
described in § 1361(c)(2), or an organization described in § 1362(c)(6)) who is not an
individual, (C) have a nonresident alien as a shareholder, and (D) have more than one
class of stock.
Section 1362(d)(2)(A) provides that an election under § 1362(a) shall be terminated
whenever (at any time on or after the 1st day of the taxable year for which the
corporation is an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small business
corporation.
Section 1.1361-1(l)(1) provides that, except as provided in § 1.1361-1(l)(4) (relating to
instruments, obligations, or arrangements treated as a second class of stock), a
corporation is treated as having only one class of stock if all outstanding shares of stock
of the corporation confer identical rights to distribution and liquidation proceeds.
Differences in voting rights among shares of stock of a corporation are disregarded in
determining whether a corporation has more than one class of stock. Thus, if all shares
of stock of an S corporation have identical rights to distribution and liquidation proceeds,
the corporation may have voting and nonvoting common stock, a class of stock that
may vote only on certain issues, irrevocable proxy agreements, or groups of shares that
differ with respect to rights to elect members of the board of directors.
Section 1.1361-1(l)(2)(i) provides, in part, that the determination of whether all
outstanding shares of stock confer identical rights to distribution and liquidation
proceeds is made based on the corporate charter, articles of incorporation, bylaws,
applicable state law, and binding agreements relating to distribution and liquidation
proceeds (collectively, the governing provisions).
Section 1.1361-1(l)(3) provides that, except as provided in §§ 1.1361-1(b)(3), (4), and
(5) (relating to restricted stock, deferred compensation plans, and straight debt), in
determining whether all outstanding shares of stock confer identical rights to distribution
and liquidation proceeds, all outstanding shares of stock of a corporation are taken into
account.
PLR-103878-13 3
Section 1362(f) provides in part that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any
corporation was terminated under § 1362(d), (2) the Secretary determines that the
circumstances resulting in the termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a
reasonable period of time after the discovery of the circumstances resulting in the
termination, steps were taken so that the corporation for which the termination occurred
is a small business corporation, and (4) the corporation for which the termination
occurred, and each person who was a shareholder in such corporation at any time
during the period of inadvertent termination of the S election, agrees to makes such
adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as
may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the
circumstances resulting in the termination, the corporation is treated as an S corporation
during the period specified by the Secretary.
Conclusion
Based solely on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that X’s
termination on Date 2 was inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f). We further
conclude hold that, pursuant to the provisions of § 1362(f), X will be treated as an S
corporation from Date 2 and thereafter provided that provided X is otherwise eligible to
be an S corporation and provided that the election was not otherwise terminated under
§ 1362(d).
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter. This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)
of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. Pursuant to a
power of attorney on file, a copy of this letter is being sent to X’s authorized
representative.
Sincerely,
Bradford R. Poston
Senior Counsel, Branch 2
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Enclosures (2)
Copy of this Letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.