Private Letter Ruling 1336021 Released September 6, 2013 Denied Transcribed from scan

PLR 1336021: IRS declines to waive the 60-day rollover deadline for unused home-purchase funds

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2013
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer withdrew money from an IRA to use toward a home purchase and intended to return the unused amount after the closing. The sale of the taxpayer’s existing home was delayed, and the unused funds were returned to the IRA after the 60-day period. The IRS declined to waive the deadline because the taxpayer had not shown that the factors in Rev. Proc. 2003-16 prevented a timely rollover and had assumed the risk that the funds could not be returned on time. The late contribution therefore was not a valid rollover contribution.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the taxpayer treat the late return of unused home-purchase funds to the IRA as a rollover contribution?
  • Outcome: Denied.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 401(a)(9) and 408(d)(3); Rev. Proc. 2003-16.

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

201336021

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

JUN 12 2013

TAX EXEMPT AND GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00

SE:T:EP:RA:T1

LEGEND:
Taxpayer A =
IRA B =

Custodian C =
Account D =
Account E =
Amount 1 =

Amount 2 =

Dear :

This letter responds to your request for a letter ruling dated September 21, 2012, as
supplemented by correspondence dated January 30, 2013 and May 1, 2013, in which
you request a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).

You submitted the following facts and representations in support of your request under
penalties of perjury:

Taxpayer A represents that she received a distribution from IRA B totaling Amount 1 to
use the funds, to the extent necessary, for a home purchase. Taxpayer A asserts her
failure to roll over the unused funds within the 60-day period prescribed by section

Page 2

408(d)(3) was due to an unexpected delay in the closing on the sale of her existing
home, resulting in her inability to return the unused funds to IRA B in a timely manner.

On April 28, 20__, Taxpayer A withdrew Amount 1 from IRA B. She represents that
because she was unemployed at the time, she would not receive a large mortgage loan
and would need a large cash down payment. She also represents that she was
uncertain how much cash she needed, but that she intended to return any unused funds
to IRA B after the closing, and she believed the closing would occur within the 60-day
period. Taxpayer A has further represented that the unused funds (Amount 2) remained
in either her savings Account D or her checking Account E from the date of distribution
to the date of return to IRA B. Taxpayer A further represented that her financial
situation subsequently caused her to withdraw those funds from IRA B to use for living
expenses.

Taxpayer A represents that the purchase of her new home was contingent on the sale
of her existing home. The purchasers of her existing home lost their financing, which
delayed the closing on her existing home by two weeks. Correspondingly, the closing on
Taxpayer A’s new home was also pushed back two weeks until June 20, 20__. The
funds (Amount 2) were not returned to IRA B until July 1, 20__, after the expiration of
the 60-day period. Despite being after the 60-day period, Taxpayer A was able to
deposit Amount 2 in IRA B with Custodian C.

Taxpayer A indicated that she is unable to recall specifically the events related to the
rollover, because she suffers from medical conditions that affected her memory.
Taxpayer A submitted documentation, including a letter from her physician dated May 1,
20__, indicating that Taxpayer A had been under his care for these medical conditions
beginning September 20__.

Based on the facts and representations, you request a ruling that the Internal Revenue
Service (“Service”) waive the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution
of Amount 2 from IRA B.

Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in section
408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in gross income
by the payee or distributee, as the case may be in the manner provided under section
72 of the Code.

Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines and provides the rules applicable to IRA rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) of the Code does not
apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for whose benefit
the IRA is maintained if: (i) the entire amount received (including money and any other
property) is paid into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day
after the day on which the individual received the payment or distribution; or (ii) the
entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid into an eligible

2

201336021

retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such individual not later than the
60th day after the date on which the payment or distribution is received, except that the
maximum amount which may be paid into such plan may not exceed the portion of the
amount received which is includible in gross income (determined without regard to
section 408(d)(3)).

Section 408(d)(3)(E) of the Code provides that the rollover provisions of section 408(d)
do not apply to any amount required to be distributed under section 408(a)(6).

Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not apply to any
amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual from an IRA if at
any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such receipt such individual
received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) from an IRA which was
not includible in gross income because of the application of section 408(d)(3).

Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for partial
rollovers.

Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive the 60-day
requirement under section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code where the failure to waive such
requirement would be against equity and good conscience, including casualty, disaster,
or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual subject to such
requirement.

Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359, provides that in determining whether to grant a
waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I), the Service
will consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a
financial institution; (2) inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability, or
hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal error;
(3) the use of amount distributed (for example, in the case of payment by check,
whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the distribution
occurred.

Taxpayer A has not presented sufficient evidence showing how the factors outlined in
Rev. Proc. 2003-16 affected her ability to roll over the distribution of Amount 2 from IRA
B. In essence, Taxpayer A made a short-term loan from IRA B when she withdrew
Amount 1, with the intention to use as much of Amount 1 as necessary to purchase a
home. In doing so, Taxpayer A assumed the risk that she might not be able to return
the unused funds timely (Amount 2). Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the
Code, the Service declines to waive the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the
April 28, 20__ distribution to Taxpayer A of Amount 1.

Thus, the contribution of Amount 2, which Taxpayer A deposited back into IRA B after
the expiration of the 60-day period, will not be considered a valid rollover contribution

Page 3

201336021

because the 60-day requirement under section 408(d)(3) of the Code with respect to
this contribution was not satisfied.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transactions described herein
under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations, which may
be applicable thereto.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact (ID Number
) at . Please address all correspondence to
SE:T:EP:RA:T:1.

Sincerely yours,

[illegible]

Carlton A. Watkins, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1

Enclosures:
Deleted copy of letter ruling
Notice 437

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.