Private Letter Ruling 1336009 Released September 6, 2013 Approved

PLR 1336009: IRS grants treaty-election relief for three Canadian RRSPs

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2013
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A married couple owned three Canadian registered retirement savings plans and had not made the required election to defer U.S. taxation on income accruing in those accounts. Their Canadian and U.S. accountants had not advised them to file Form 8891 or make the election under Article XVIII(7) of the U.S.-Canada treaty. After learning of the requirement, they promptly requested relief. The IRS granted 60 days from the ruling date to make the elections under Rev. Proc. 2002-23 and required amended returns with Forms 8891 for open years and continuing filings through final distributions.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the taxpayers receive additional time to elect Rev. Proc. 2002-23 treaty relief for their three Canadian RRSPs?
  • Outcome: Approved, with an extension until 60 days from the ruling date.
  • Key authorities: Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3; Rev. Proc. 2002-23; U.S.-Canada Income Tax Convention, Article XVIII(7).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201336009 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 9/6/2013 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.00-00, 9114.03-06
Person To Contact:
---------------------------------------- -----------------------------, ID No. -------------
-------------------------- -----------------
--------------------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:B01
PLR-128194-11
Date:
May 31, 2013

TY: --------------

Legend

Taxpayer = ------------------
------------------------

Spouse = -----------------------
------------------------

RRSP 1 = --------------------------
----------------------------------------

RRSP 2 = --------------------------
----------------------------------------

RRSP 3 = --------------------------
---------------------------------------

Tax Years = --------------

Year 1 = -------

Year 2 = -------

Year 3 = -------

Year 4 = -------
PLR-128194-11 2

Dear ------------ ----- --------------:

This is in reply to a letter dated -------------------, requesting an extension of time under
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 for Taxpayer and Spouse to elect the provisions of Rev. Proc.
2002-23, 2002-1 C.B. 744, for Tax Years.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by Taxpayer and Spouse and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement
executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material
submitted in support of the requested rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.
The information submitted for consideration is substantially as set forth below.

FACTS

In Year 1, Taxpayer married Spouse, a U.S. citizen. Prior to becoming a U.S. citizen in
Year 2, Taxpayer was a citizen and resident of Canada, during which time Taxpayer
established two Canadian Registered Retirement Savings Plans (RRSPs), RRSP 1 and
RRSP 2. Shortly after marrying Taxpayer in Year 1, Spouse moved to Canada. While
residing in Canada, Spouse established RRSP 3. Beginning in Year 2, Taxpayer and
Spouse began filing joint U.S. income tax returns. Taxpayer and Spouse both relied on
a Canadian accountant to prepare their Canadian and U.S. income tax returns.

Taxpayer and Spouse moved to the United States and engaged the services of U.S.
accountants to prepare their joint U.S. income tax returns beginning with the Year 3 tax
year. Since Year 3, none of their U.S. accountants made an election for Taxpayer and
Spouse pursuant to Rev. Proc. 89-45 or advised them of the need to file Form 8891 for
years beginning after publication of Rev. Proc. 2002-23 to defer U.S. taxation of
earnings accruing in their RRSP accounts.

At all times during Taxpayer and Spouse’s ownership of their RRSP accounts, they
were not aware nor advised by their Canadian or U.S. accountants that they had to file
Form 8891 and make an election to defer U.S. taxation on income accruing in RRSP 1,
RRSP 2, and RRSP 3 pursuant to Article XVIII(7) of the United States-Canada Income
Tax Convention (Treaty).

In Year 4, Taxpayer and Spouse met with their U.S. accountant to discuss various tax
matters. During the course of a discussion regarding Taxpayer and Spouse’s finances,
the U.S. accountant discovered for the first time that Taxpayer and Spouse had not
made elections to defer tax on income accruing in their RRSP accounts pursuant to
Article XVIII(7) of the Treaty. After meeting with their U.S. accountants and attorneys to
PLR-128194-11 3

discuss this matter, Taxpayer and Spouse took immediate action to request an
extension of time to elect the provisions of Rev. Proc. 2002-23 for Tax Years.

As of the date of this ruling request, the Internal Revenue Service had not
communicated with Taxpayer or Spouse in any way regarding RRSP 1, RRSP 2, or
RRSP 3.

RULING REQUESTED

Taxpayer and Spouse request the consent of the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue
Service for an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to make an election
pursuant to Rev. Proc. 2002-23, to defer U.S. federal income taxation on income
accrued in RRSP 1, RRSP 2, and RRSP 3, as provided for in Article XVIII(7) of the
Treaty, for Tax Years.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a
taxpayer a reasonable extension of time, under the rules set forth in Treas. Reg. §
301.9100-3, to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue
Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100 -1(b) provides that an election includes an application for relief
in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is
prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or
announcement.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will
be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that
the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice
the interests of the Government.

In the present situation, the election provided in Rev. Proc. 2002-23 is a regulatory
election within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(b). Therefore, the
Commissioner has discretionary authority under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100–1(c) to grant
Taxpayer and Spouse an extension of time, provided that Taxpayer and Spouse satisfy
the standards set forth in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a).

Based solely on the information submitted and representations made, we conclude that
Taxpayer and Spouse satisfy the standards of Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3. Accordingly,
Taxpayer and Spouse are granted an extension of time until 60 days from the date of
this ruling letter to make elections for Tax Years under Rev. Proc. 2002-23. As provided
in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(a), the granting of an extension of time is not a
PLR-128194-11 4

determination that Taxpayer and Spouse are otherwise eligible to make the above-
described election.

Pursuant to section 4.07 of Rev. Proc. 2002-23, the election once made cannot be
revoked except with the consent of the Commissioner. For open Tax Years, Taxpayer
and Spouse must file amended U.S. income tax returns to which they attach Forms
8891 for each of their RRSP Accounts. For each subsequent tax year through the year
in which a final distribution is made from RRSP 1, RRSP 2 or RRSP 3, Taxpayer and
Spouse must file a Form 8891 for each respective RRSP account.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.

A copy of this letter must be attached to Taxpayer and Spouse’s U.S. income tax return
for the year in which Taxpayer and Spouse obtained the ruling and should be
associated with Taxpayer and Spouse’s amended returns for open Tax Years.

This letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayers who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter will be sent to
your authorized representatives.

                                    Sincerely,



                                    Elizabeth U. Karzon
                                    Chief, Branch 1
                                    Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                    (International)

Enclosure:

Copy for 6110 purposes

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.