Private Letter Ruling 1334031 Released August 23, 2013 Approved

IRS preserves an S corporation election after voided transfers to ineligible trusts

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2013
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS ruled that a corporation could continue to be treated as an S corporation after two shareholders transferred stock to trusts that were not eligible S corporation shareholders. A court later declared the transfers void and confirmed that the original shareholders remained the owners. Because the possible termination was inadvertent, the corporation could retain its S corporation status under IRC § 1362(f), provided the election was not otherwise terminated and the corporation and shareholders made required adjustments, including amended returns. The ruling did not address whether the corporation was otherwise eligible to be an S corporation.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the corporation's S corporation election continue after stock transfers to ineligible trusts were declared void?
  • Outcome: Approved, subject to the ruling's conditions.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361, 1362, and 6110.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201334031 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 8/23/2013 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Numbers: 1362.00-00, 1362.04-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------------------- -----------------------, ID No. -------------------
------------------------------------------------ ---------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------------------------- ----------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B03
PLR-147168-12
Date:
April 25, 2013

                                               LEGEND

Company = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

State = ---------------

Court = -------------------------------------

Date 1 = ----------------------

Date 2 = ----------------------

Date 3 = -------

Date 4 = ----------------------

Date 5 = ----------------------

a = -------

b = -------

A = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

B = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Trust 1 = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Trust 2 = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLR-147168-12 2

Dear ---------------------:

This letter responds to a letter dated October 25, 2012, and subsequent
correspondence, submitted on behalf of Company by Company’s authorized
representative, requesting a ruling under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.

                                      FACTS

Company was incorporated under the laws of State on Date 1 and elected to be an S
corporation effective Date 2. In Date 3, Company’s shareholders executed a
Shareholders Agreement. Under the agreement, a shareholder is not allowed to
transfer shares of Company’s stock to any person or entity that is not permitted to be a
shareholder of an S corporation. On Date 4, A transferred shares of Company’s stock
to Trust 1, and B transferred shares of Company’s stock to Trust 2. Trust 1 and Trust 2
are not eligible S corporation shareholders.

On Date 5, Court entered an order holding that A’s and B’s transfers of Company’s
stock to Trust 1 and Trust 2, respectively, were null and void and that A and B remained
the owner of the transferred shares in Company. As a result of the order, A and B have
filed or will file amended tax returns for taxable years a and b consistent with the
treatment of Company as an S corporation.

Company represents that the circumstances resulting in the possible termination of
Company’s S corporation election were inadvertent and were not motivated by tax
avoidance or retroactive tax planning. Company and its shareholders have agreed to
make adjustments, consistent with the treatment of Company as an S corporation, as
may be required by the Service.

                              LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 1361(a)(1) provides that the term “S corporation” means, with respect to any
taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is in
effect for such year.

Section 1361(b)(1) provides, in part, that the term “small business corporation” means a
domestic corporation which is not an ineligible corporation and which does not have as
a shareholder a person (other than an estate, a trust described in § 1361(c)(2), or an
organization described in § 1361(c)(6)) who is not an individual.

Section 1362(d)(2)(A) provides that an election under § 1362(a) shall be terminated
whenever (at any time on or after the first day of the first taxable year for which the
corporation is an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small business
corporation.
PLR-147168-12 3

Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any corporation was
terminated under § 1362(d)(2) or (3), (2) the Secretary determines that the
circumstances resulting in such termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a
reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in such
termination, steps were taken so that the corporation for which the termination occurred
is a small business corporation, and (4) the corporation for which the termination
occurred, and each person who was a shareholder in such corporation at any time
during the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments
(consistent with the treatment of such corporation as an S corporation) as may be
required by the Secretary with respect to this period, then, notwithstanding the
circumstances resulting in such termination, such corporation shall be treated as an S
corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.

                                  CONCLUSION

Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that if
Company’s S corporation election terminated on Date 4 due to ineligible shareholders,
the termination was inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f). Accordingly, under
§ 1362(f) Company will be treated as continuing to be an S corporation from Date 4 and
thereafter, provided that Company’s S corporation election is not otherwise terminated
under § 1362(d). In addition, Company and its shareholders must treat A and B as
having been the shareholders of Company shares that A and B attempted to transfer to
Trust 1 and Trust 2, respectively, and amend any prior tax returns that are inconsistent
with this treatment within 120 days of the date of this ruling.

Except as expressly provided herein, we express or imply no opinion concerning the tax
consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this
letter. Specifically, we express or imply no opinion regarding whether Company is
otherwise eligible to be treated as an S corporation.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides
that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Under a power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of this letter to
your authorized representative.
PLR-147168-12 4

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the ruling request, it is subject to verification on examination.

                                 Sincerely,



                                 Mary Beth Carchia
                                 Acting Branch Chief, Branch 3
                                 Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                 (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2):

A copy of this letter
A copy for § 6110 purposes

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.