IRS revokes a civic organization's exemption after finding extensive unrelated transportation businesses
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The IRS revoked a transportation organization's exemption under IRC § 501(c)(4). The organization operated a city bus line that the examination report treated as an exempt activity, but it also operated taxi, airport shuttle, limousine, and charter or tour businesses that were similar to for-profit transportation services. The IRS concluded that the organization was not operated exclusively for an exempt purpose. The organization had signed a consent to the proposed adverse action, and the IRS required it to file federal income tax returns.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Did the organization continue to qualify for exemption under IRC § 501(c)(4) while operating several transportation businesses?
- Outcome: Revocation of exemption under IRC § 501(c)(4), effective January 1 of the redacted year.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 501(c)(4), 4958, 512, 513, and 277; Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(4)-1; Treas. Reg. §§ 53.4958-1, 53.4958-4, and 53.4958-7.
Full text (IRS public release)
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Attn: Mandatory Review, MC 4920 DAL
1100 Commerce St.
Dallas, TX 75242
TAX EXEMPT AND 501-04.00
DIVISION
Release Number: 201333018
Release Date: 8/16/2013
Date: March 4, 2013
LEGEND Taxpayer Identification Number:
ORG - Organization name Form:
XX - Date Address - address Tax Year(s) Ended:
Person to Contact/ID Number:
Contact Numbers:
Telephone:
Fax:
ORG
ADDRESS
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Dear PRESIDENT:
We have completed our examination of your Form 990 for the periods ended
December 31, 20XX and 20XX. It has been determined that your exempt status should
be revoked.
The previous report of examination issued on November 7, 20XX, states the basis for
the revocation. You have concurred with our determination by signing Form 6018,
Consent to Proposed Adverse Action, on December 27, 20XX. A copy of which is
enclosed. Accordingly, your exemption from Federal income tax under section
501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code has been revoked effective January 1, 20XX.
You are required to file Federal income tax return, Form 1041, with the Internal
Revenue Service Center. We have secured the delinquent Forms 1041 for the periods
ended December 31, 20XX through December 31, 20XX. When filing future returns,
remember the Internal Revenue Code section 277 may limit your deductions.
You also have the right to contact the Office of the Taxpayer Advocate. However, you
should first contact the person whose name and telephone number are shown above
since this person can access your tax information and can help you get answers. You
can call 1-877-777-4778, and ask for the Taxpayer Advocate assistance or you can
contact the Advocate from the site where this issue was determined by writing to:
Taxpayer Advocate assistance cannot be used as substitute for established IRS
procedures, formal appeals processes, etc. The Taxpayer Advocate is not able to
reverse legal or technically correct tax determination, nor extend the time fixed by law
that you have to file a petition in Court. The Taxpayer Advocate can, however, see that
a tax matter that may not have been resolved through normal channels gets prompt
and proper handling.
Please keep a copy of this report with your permanent records.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the person whose name
and telephone number are shown above.
Sincerely yours,
Nanette M. Downing
Director, EO Examination
Enclosure(s):
Publication 892
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division
Exempt Organizations: Examinations
Attn: A.C. M/S 0540
100 SW Main Street, STE 1200
Portland, OR 97204
Date: February 6, 2013 Taxpayer Identification Number:
Form:
Tax Year(s) Ended:
ORG Person to Contact/ID Number:
ADDRESS Contact Numbers:
Telephone:
Fax:
Certified Mail — Return Receipt Requested
Dear
We have enclosed a copy of our report of examination explaining why we believe revocation of
your organization's exempt status is necessary.
If you do not agree with our position you may appeal your case. The enclosed Publication
3498, The Examination Process, explains how to appeal an Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
decision. Publication 3498 also includes information on your rights as a taxpayer and the IRS
collection process.
If you request a conference, we will forward your written statement of protest to the Appeals
Office and they will contact you. For your convenience, an envelope is enclosed.
If you and Appeals do not agree on some or all of the issues after your Appeals conference, or if
you do not request an Appeals conference, you may file suit in United States Tax Court, the
United States Court of Federal Claims, or United States District Court, after satisfying
procedural and jurisdictional requirements as described in Publication 3498.
You may also request that we refer this matter for technical advice as explained in Publication
892, Exempt Organization Appeal Procedures for Unagreed Issues. If a determination letter is
issued to you based on technical advice, no further administrative appeal is available to you
within the IRS on the issue that was the subject of the technical advice.
If you accept our findings, please sign and return the enclosed Form 6018-A, Consent to
Proposed Action. We will then send you a final letter revoking your exempt status. If we do not
hear from you within 30 days from the date of this letter, we will process your case on the basis
of the recommendations shown in the report of examination and this letter will become final. In
that event, you will be required to file Federal income tax returns for the tax period(s) shown
above. File these returns with the Ogden Service Center within 60 days from the date of this
letter, unless a request for an extension of time is granted. File returns for later tax years with the
appropriate service center indicated in the instructions for those returns.
[illegible]
Letter 3610 (Rev 11-2003)
Catalog Number 34801V
You have the right to contact the office of the Taxpayer Advocate. Taxpayer Advocate
assistance is not a substitute for established IRS procedures, such as the formal appeals
process. The Taxpayer Advocate cannot reverse a legally correct tax determination, or extend
the time fixed by law that you have to file a petition in a United States court. The Taxpayer
Advocate can, however, see that a tax matter that may not have been resolved through normal
channels gets prompt and proper handling. You may call toll-free 1-877-777-4778 and ask for
Taxpayer Advocate Assistance. If you prefer, you may contact your local Taxpayer Advocate
at:
If you have any questions, please call the contact person at the telephone number shown in the
heading of this letter. If you write, please provide a telephone number and the most convenient
time to call if we need to contact you.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
Nanette M Downing
Director, EO Examinations
Enclosures:
Publication 892
Publication 3498
Form 6018-A
Report of Examination
2 Letter 3610 (Rev 11-2003)
Catalog Number 34801V
Schedule number or exhibit
Form 886-A
(Rev. January 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS
Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended
ORG EIN Dec. 31, 20XX
LEGEND
ORG - Organization name EIN - ein XX - Date Address - address City -
city State - state RA-1 & RA-2 - 1st & 2nd RA DIR-1 & DIR-2 - 1st & 2nd DIR
CO-1 THROUGH CO-12 - 1st THROUGH 12th COMPANIES
ISSUES:
1) Is the ORG ("ORG") conducting unrelated business activity and, is there any unrelated business
income tax due on these activities?
2) Should the exempt status of ORG be revoked as a result of excessive unrelated business activity?
3) If the exempt status should not be revoked, should ORG be required to report the income and
expenses related to the non-exempt activity on a Form 990-T?
- FACTS:
ORG (ORG) is located at Address, City, State. The entity was originally operated as a for-profit company
which began in 19XX. In 19XX, ORG was purchased from the prior owners and operated by DIR-1 until
19XX. In that year, the business operation was turned over to his son, DIR-2. ORG operates under the
name of CO-1.
ORG applied for and received exempt status under Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(4) in November
of 19XX. The Form 1024 application for exempt status shows that the exempt purpose of the organization
would be to operate a bus line (CO-2) serving the City of City, State.
In 19XX, ORG purchased CO-3 from DIR-2, RA-1 and RA-2 for $$. According to the ORG website, The
CO-3 was sold to an outside party in 20XX. In 20XX, the company was re-acquired and renamed as CO-4.
In 19XX, ORG purchased the ORG facility from DIR-1 for $$.
ORG added an airport shuttle service (CO-5) in 19XX, a limousine service (CO-6) in 20XX and a charter
bus/tour service (CO-7) in 20XX. In 20XX, ORG purchased two trolleys from DIR-1, RA-1, RA-2 and DIR-2
for $$ which were used in the touring activity.
Financials:
ORG provided the following information in it's General Ledger:
Program Service: Advertising
Program Service: Charter
CO-4
CO-8 Program
CO-9
Title 36 & Similar
CO-10
CO-11
Clearinghouse Processing fees
Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service
Form 886-A (1-1994)
Page 1 publish.no.irs.gov
Catalog Number 20810W
Schedule number or exhibit
Form 886-A
(Rev. January 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS
Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended
ORG EIN Dec. 31, 20XX
LEGEND
ORG - Organization name EIN - ein XX - Date Address - address City -
city State - state RA-1 & RA-2 - 1% & 2°¢ RA DIR-1 & DIR-2 - 1° & 2"? DIR
CO-1 THROUGH CO-12 - 1°* THROUGH 12™ COMPANIES
ISSUES:
1) Is the ORG (“ORG”) conducting unrelated business activity and, is there any unrelated business
income tax due on these activities?
2) Should the exempt status of ORG be revoked as a result of excessive unrelated business activity?
3) Ifthe exempt status should not be revoked, should ORG be required to report the income and
expenses related to the non-exempt activity on a Form 990-T?
- FACTS:
ORG (ORG) is located at Address, City, State. The entity was originally operated as a for-profit company
which began in 19XX. In 19XX, ORG was purchased from the prior owners and operated by DIR-1 until
19XX. In that year, the business operation was turned over to his son, DIR-2._ ORG operates under the
name of CO-1.
ORG applied for and received exempt status under Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(4) in November
of 19XX. The Form 1024 application for exempt status shows that the exempt purpose of the organization
would be to operate a bus line (CO-2) serving the City of City, State.
In 19XX, ORG purchased CO-3 from DIR-2, RA-1 and RA-2 for $$. According to the ORG website, The
CO-3 was sold to an outside party in 20XX. In 20XX, the company was re-acquired and renamed as CO-4.
In 19XX, ORG purchased the ORG facility from DIR-1 for $$.
ORG added an airport shuttle service (CO-5) in 19XX, a limousine service (CO-6) in 20XX and a charter
bus/tour service (CO-7) in 20XX. In 20XX, ORG purchased two trolleys from DIR-1, RA-1, RA-2 and DIR-2
for $$ which were used in the touring activity.
Financials:
ORG provided the following information in it's General Ledger:
Program Service: Advertising
Program Service: Charter
CO-4
CO-8 Program
CO-9
Title 36 & Similar
CO-10
CO-11
Clearinghouse Processing fees
Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service
Form 886-A (1-1994)
Page 1 publish.no.irs.gov
Catalog Number 20810W
Schedule number or exhibit
Form 886-A
(Rev. January 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS
Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended
ORG EIN Dec. 31, 20XX
LAW:
IRC, 20XX-CODE-VOL, SEC. 501. EXEMPTION FROM TAX ON CORPORATIONS, CERTAIN
TRUSTS, ETC.
501(c)(4)(A)- Civic leagues or organizations not organized for profit but operated exclusively for
the promotion of social welfare, or local associations of employees, the membership of which is
limited to the employees of a designated person or persons in a particular municipality, and the net
earnings of which are devoted exclusively to charitable, educational, or recreational purposes.
501(c)(4)(B)- Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to an entity unless no part of the net earnings of
such entity inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual.
FINAL-REG, TAX-REGS, §1.501(c)(4)-1. Civic organizations and local associations of employees
(a) Civic organizations
(1) In general. —A civic league or organization may be exempt as an organization described in
section 501(c)(4) if:
(i) It is not organized or operated for profit; and
(ii) It is operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare.
(2) Promotion of social welfare
(i) In general. —An organization is operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare if it is
primarily engaged in promoting in some way the common good and general welfare of the people of
the community. An organization embraced within this section is one which is operated primarily for
the purpose of bringing about civic betterments and social improvements. A “social welfare”
organization will qualify for exemption as a charitable organization if it falls within the definition of
“charitable” set forth in paragraph (d)(2) of §1.501(c)(3)-1 and is not an “action” organization as set
forth in paragraph (c)(3) of §1.501(c)(3)-1.
Section 4958(a) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code imposes on each excess benefit transaction, a tax equal
to 25 percent of the excess benefit (the “first tier tax”). This tax must be paid by any disqualified person
with respect to such transaction.
Section 4958(b) of the Code provides that where an initial tax is imposed, but the excess benefit involved in
such transaction is not corrected within the taxable period, a tax equal to 200 percent of the excess benefit
involved is imposed and must be paid by any disqualified person with respect to such transaction (the
“second tier tax’).
Section 4958(c) of the Code, in part, defines “excess benefit transaction” as any transaction in which an
economic benefit is provided by an “applicable tax-exempt organization” directly or indirectly to or for the
use of any disqualified person if the value of the economic benefit provided exceeds the value of the
consideration (including the performance of services) received for providing such benefit.
Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page _2 publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service
Schedule number or exhibit
Form 886-A
(Rev. January 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS
Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended
ORG EIN Dec. 31, 20XX
Section 4958(e) of the Code defines “applicable tax-exempt organization” as an organization described in
either section 501(c)(3) or section 501(c)(4) of the Code or an organization which was so described at any
time during the five-year period ending on the date of the excess benefit transaction.
Section 4958(f)(1) of the Code defines “disqualified person” as (A) any person who was, at any time during
the five-year period ending on the date of such transaction, in a position to exercise substantial influence
over the affairs of the organization, (B) a member of the family of a disqualified person, and (C) a 35-
percent controlled entity.
Treasury Regulations
§53.4958-1(e)(1) of the Treasury Regulations provides that, except as otherwise provided, an excess
benefit transaction occurs on the date on which the disqualified person receives the economic benefit for
federal income tax purposes.
Treas. Reg. §53.4958-1(c)(2)(i) provides, in part, that if a disqualified person makes a payment of less than
the full correction amount under the rules of §53.4958-7, the 200-percent tax is imposed on the unpaid
portion of the correction amount (as described in §53.4958-7(c)).
Treas. Reg. §53.4958-1(c)(2)(ii) defines the “taxable period’, with respect to any excess benefit transaction,
as the period beginning with the date on which the transaction occurs and ending on the earlier of —
(A) The date of mailing a notice of deficiency under §6212 with respect to the §4958(a)(1) tax; or
(B) The date on which the tax imposed by §4958(a)(1) is assessed.
Treas. Reg. §53.4958-1(c)(2)(iii) provides, in part, that the abatement rules of §4961 specifically provide for
a 90-day correction period after the date of mailing a notice of deficiency under §6212 with respect to the
§4958(b) 200-percent tax. If the excess benefit is corrected during that correction period, the 200-percent |
tax imposed shall not be assessed, and if assessed the assessment shall be abated, and if collected shall
be credited or refunded as an overpayment.
Treas. Reg. §53.4958-7(c) states that the correction amount with respect to an excess benefit transaction
equals the sum of the excess benefit (as defined in §53.4958-1(b)) and interest on the excess benefit. The
amount of the interest charged for purposes of this section is determined by multiplying the excess benefit
by an interest rate, compounded annually, for the period from the date the excess benefit transaction
occurred (as defined in §53.4958-1(e)) to the date of correction.
Treas. Reg. §53.4958-4(c)(1) provides that an economic benefit is not treated as consideration for the
performance of services unless the organization providing the benefit clearly indicates the intent to treat the
benefit as compensation when the benefit is paid. An applicable tax exempt organization is treated as
clearly indicating its intent to provide an economic benefit as compensation for services only if the
organization provided written substantiation that is contemporaneous with the transfer of the economic
benefit at issue. If an organization fails to provide this contemporaneous substantiation, any services
provided by the disqualified person will not be treated as provided in consideration for the economic benefit
for purposes of determining the reasonableness of the transaction.
Treas. Reg. §53.4958-4(c)(3)(i)(A) provides that an organization’s reporting constitutes contemporaneous
substantiation to treat a benefit as compensation if the organization reports the benefit as compensation on
an original Federal tax information return with respect to the payment (e.g., Form W-2 or 1099); or (B) the
Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page_ 3 publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service
Schedule number or exhibit
Form 886-A
(Rev. January 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS
Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended
ORG EIN Dec. 31, 20XX
recipient disqualified person reports the benefit as income on the person’s original Federal tax return (e.g.,
Form 1040); or there is an approved written employment contract executed on or before the date of the
transfer indicating the benefit is compensation; or there is documentation by the organization’s authorized
body approving the transfer as compensation for services on or before the date of the transfer; or there was
written evidence in existence before the due date of the applicable Federal tax return indicating a
reasonable belief by the organization that the benefit was a nontaxable benefit as described in Regulations
§53.4958-4(c)(2).
Internal Revenue Code section 512 and 513 - Unrelated Business Income: Unrelated business income
is the income from a trade or business that is regularly carried on by an exempt organization and that is not
substantially related to the performance by the organization of its exempt purpose or function, except that
the organization uses the profits derived from this activity.
Trade or Business: The term “trade or business” generally includes any activity carried on for the
production of income from selling goods or performing services. An activity does not lose its identity as a
trade or business merely because it is carried on with a larger group of similar activities that may, or may
not, be related to the exempt purpose of the organization.
Regularly Carried On: Business activities of an exempt organization are ordinarily considered regularly
carried on if they show a frequency and continuity, and are pursued in a manner similar to comparable
commercial activities of nonexempt organizations.
Not Substantially Related: A business activity is not substantially related to an organization’s exempt
purpose if it does not contribute importantly to accomplishing that purpose (other than through the
production of funds). Whether an activity contributes importantly depends in each case on the facts
involved. In determining whether activities contribute importantly to the accomplishment of an exempt
purpose, the size and extent of the activities involved must be considered in relation to the nature and
extent of the exempt function that they intend to serve.
In John Marshall Law School v. United States, 228 Ct. Cl. 902 (1981) [81-2 USTC ¶9745 ], The law school
and the college paid for the founding family’s automobiles, education, travel expenses, insurance policies,
basketball and hockey tickets, membership in a private eating establishment, membership in a health spa,
interest-free loans, home repairs, personal household furnishings and appliances, and golfing equipment.
The court determined that the expenditures for the founding family were not ordinary and necessary
expenses in the course of the law school’s and the college’s operations. The court also found that the
payment of college expenses for the founder’s children by the law school provided direct and substantial
benefits to the founder of the law school and his brother. The payment of the college expenses helped to
defray the costs of their children’s education, a cost which they otherwise would have had to satisfy from
other resources. The court found these payments to constitute prohibited inurement of the law school’s
earnings to the founder and his brother, parents of the students
TAXPAYER'S POSITION:
The organization has not yet provided a position and, with this writing, is being given the opportunity to
respond.
Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page 4 publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service
Schedule number or exhibit
Form 886-A
(Rev. January 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS
Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended
ORG EIN Dec. 31, 20XX
GOVERNMENT’S POSITION:
ORG does not qualify for exempt status under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) section 501(a) because it is
not operating exclusively for an exempt purpose. The organization’s primary activity is the conduct of
multiple unrelated business activities including a taxi service (CO-4), airport shuttle service (CO-5),
limousine service (CO-10), bus charters and tours (Executive Charter Service and Tours).
ORG continues to operate the city bus line (CO-2) that has been in operation since 19XX. The bus line is
an exempt activity which alleviates the cost to the local and/or state government of operating a similar
mass transit system at public expense. The bus charges riders $ per trip or they can purchase a full day
ticket for $. It is apparent that the reduced fee is a benefit to the low income residents of Prescott as well
as an incentive which reduces the auto related air pollution in the area.
The CO-4 activity is a typical on-demand taxi service. Taxi’s are owned by the drivers and the organization
takes a portion of the receipts of the taxi’s in exchange for dispatch service and advertising. While there
are aspects of this activity that serve a charitable purpose (free rides to veterans to the military hospital,
free holiday rides for inebriated persons), it is similar to the operation of most for-profit taxi services. The
charitable portion does not change the for-profit nature of the activity.
The limousine service (CO-10) provides chauffeured ultra luxury vehicles which are hired for a set period of
time. The chauffeurs provide personal services to the client and the vehicles are stocked with
refreshments and equipment designed to pamper the clients while riding to their destination. This is similar
to the operation of most for-profit limousine services.
The airport shuttle service (CO-5) provides transportation between fixed points (airport to a pre-designated
drop off point and vice-versa) of groups of individuals using vans or small buses. The clients pay a fee that
is based on lower costs due as a result of multiple persons traveling to locations within a short distance of
each other. This is typical of most for-profit airport shuttle services.
The charter service (CO-7) is designed to transport larger groups of persons from a single pick up spot to a
single destination (such as the casinos) or for tours of historical/natural sights (such as the CO-12) and
returning the group to the original pick up location. This is typical of most for-profit sightseeing and charter
bus services.
Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page _5 publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-internal Revenue Service
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.