IRS revokes a foundation's tax exemption for serving private and commercial interests

View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS revoked a foundation's recognition as a § 501(c)(3) organization effective January 1, 2006. The final adverse determination says the foundation operated in substantial part to promote a for-profit company's health products, returned much of its membership revenue to that company for products sent to members, invested in for-profit entities, and made grants without adequate control over how the funds were used. The IRS concluded that these activities served substantial private and commercial interests rather than exclusively exempt purposes, and that contributions to the organization were not deductible under § 170. The organization was instructed to file Form 1120 returns and, if it was a private foundation, continue filing Form 990-PF until its private-foundation status ended.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: Did the organization continue to qualify for exemption under IRC § 501(c)(3)?
• Outcome: Revocation, exemption was revoked effective January 1, 2006.
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 501(c)(3), 170, 507, 6104, 7428, and 6110(k)(3); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.501(c)(3)-1(c), 1.501(c)(3)-1(d), and 1.501(c)(3)-1(e); Rev. Rul. 68-489.

Full text (IRS public release)

i a
te . * 2;

Internal Revenue Service + Department of the Treasury

Appeals Office . :
55 S. Market St., Ste.440 . >. Taxpayer identification Number:
‘San Jose, CA 99218 Person to Contact:
Release Number: 201331008 et
’ Release Date: 8/2/2013 Employes | :
Date: May 10, 2013 Fax:
: Contact Hours:
Tax Period(s) Ended:

UIL: 501.33-09

Certified Mail

Dear

This is a final adverse determination regarding your exempt status under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code (the “Code’). It is determined that you do not qualify as exempt from Federal income tax

• under section 501(c)(3) of the Code effective January 1, 2006.

The revocation of your exempt status was made for the following reason(s):

e You are not operated exclusively for exempt purposes as described in section 501(c)(3) of the

Code.
e You operate for the substantial non-exempt purpose of acting as a tool to enhance the sales of

health products of a for-profit entity.
Most of your membership fees are returned to a for-profit entity for products the for-profit entity

sends to your members.
You operate for the substantial non-exempt purpose of investing in for-profit entities.
You have made distributions to for-profit entities without exercising the requisite discretion and

control to ensure that the funds were spent for exempt purposes.
Contributions to your organization are not deductible under section 170 of the Code.

You are required to file Federal income tax returns on Forms 1120 for the tax periods stated in the
heading of this letter and for all tax years thereafter. File your return with the appropriate Internal
Revenue Service Center per the instructions of the return. For further instructions, forms, and information

please visit www.irs.gov.

if you were a private foundation as of the effective date of revocation, you are considered to be taxable
private foundation until you terminate your private foundation status under section 507 of the Code. In
’ addition to your income tax return, you: must also continue to file Form 990-PF by the 15th Day of the fifth

month after the end of your annual accounting period.

Processing of income tax returns and assessments of any taxes due will not be delayed should a petition
for declaratory judgment be filed under section 7428 of the Code.

If you decide to contest this determination, you may file an action for declaratory judgment under the
provisions of section 7428 of the Code in one of the following three venues: 1) United States Tax Court,
2) the United States Court of Federal Claims, or 3) the United States District Court for the District of
Columbia. A petition or complaint in one of these three courts must be filed within 90 days from the date
this determination letter was mailed to you. Please contact the clerk of the appropriate court for rules for
filing petitions for declaratory judgment. To secure a petition form from the United States Tax Court, write

to the United States Tax Court, 400 Second Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20217. See also Publication
892.

You also have the right to contact the office of the Taxpayer Advocate. Taxpayer Advocate assistance is
not a substitute for established IRS procedures, such as the formal appeals process. The Taxpayer
Advocate cannot reverse a legally correct tax determination, or extend the time fixed by law that you have
to file a petition in a United States Court. The Taxpayer Advocate can however, see that a tax matter
that may not have been resolved through normal channels get prompt and proper handling. If you want
Taxpayer Advocate assistance, please contact the Taxpayer Advocate for the IRS office that issued this
letter. You may call toll-free, 1-877-777-4778, for the Taxpayer Advocate or visit www.irs.gov/advocate

for more information.

If you have any questions, please contact the person whose name and telephone number are shown in
the heading of this letter. ,

Sincerely Yours,

Appeals Team Manager

Enclosure: Publication 892

ce:

4

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury

Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division
3730 Elizabeth Ave.
Independence, MO 64057

Date: November 9, 2010
Taxpayer Identification Number:

LEGEND

ORG - Organization name ;

XX - Date Address - address Form:
Tax Year(s) Ended:

ORG ‘ Person to Contact/ID Number:

ADDRESS

, Contact Telephone Number:
Contact Fax Number: —

CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT
REQUESTED
Dear

We have enclosed a copy of our report of examination explaining why we believe revocation of your exempt
status under-section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code 509(a)(2) is necessary.

If you accept our findings, take no further action. We will issue a final revocation letter.

If you do not agree with our proposed revocation, you must submit to us a written request for Appeals Office
consideration within 30 days from the date of this letter to protest our decision. Your protest should include a

_ statement of the facts, the applicable law, and arguments in support of your position.

An Appeals officer will review your case. The Appeals office is independent of the Director, EO
Examinations. The Appeals Office resolves most disputes informally and promptly. The enclosed
Publication 3498, The Examination Process, and Publication 892, Exempt Organizations Appeal Procedures
for Unagreed Issues, explain how to appeal an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) decision. Publication 3498
also includes information on your rights as a taxpayer and the IRS collection process.

You may also request that we refer this matter for technical advice as explained in Publication 892. If we
issue a determination letter to you based on technical advice, no further administrative appeal i is available to
you within the IRS regarding the issue that was the subject of the technical advice.

If we do not hear from you within 30 days from the date of this letter, we will process your case based on the
recommendations shown in the report of examination. If you do not protest this proposed determination
within 30 days from the date of this letter, the IRS will consider it to be a failure to exhaust your available
administrative remedies. Section 7428(b)(2) of the Code provides, in part: “A declaratory judgment or
decree under this section shall not be issued in any proceeding unless the Tax Court, the Claims Court, or the
District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia determines that the organization involved has
-exhausted its administrative remedies within the Internal Revenue Service.” We will then issue a final
revocation letter. We will also notify the appropriate state officials of the revocation in accordance with

section 6104(c) of the Code.

Letter 3618 (Rev 11/2003)
Catalog Number 34809F

2

You have the right to contact the office of the Taxpayer Advocate. Taxpayer Advocate assistance is not a

substitute for established IRS procedures, such as the formal appeals process. The Taxpayer Advocate

_ cannot reverse a legally correct tax determination, or extend the time fixed by law that you have to file a
petition in a United States court. The Taxpayer Advocate can, however, see that a tax matter that may not

have been resolved through normal channels gets prompt and proper handling. You may call toll-free 1-877-

777-4778 and ask for Taxpayer Advocate Assistance. If you prefer, you may contact your local Taxpayer

Advocate at:

If you have any questions, please call the contact person at the telephone number shown in the heading of this
letter. If you write, please provide a telephone number and the most convenient time to call if we need to

contact you.

Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,

Nanette M. Downing
Director, EO Examination

Enclosures:
Publication 892 _
Publication 3498
Report of Examination

— Sone ~ : - Letter 3618 (Rev 11/2003)
; Catalog Number 34809F

Form 886 A Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service Schedule No. or
Explanation of Items Exhibit
Name of Taxpayer Year/Period Ended
ORG 20XX, 20XX &
20XX

LEGEND :
ORG - Organization name ORG-1 - ORG-1 EIN - HIN XX - Date
State - state motto —- motto Country - country Book - book
DIR-1 through DIR-6 - 1° through 6" DIR Director - Director co-1
through CO-14 - 1° through 14‘ COMPANIES RA-1 - 1%* RA
ISSUES:

Whether ORG is operated exclusively for exempt purposes within
the meaning Section 501(c) (3) of Internal Revenue Code.

FACTS:

ORG (Foundation), Employer Identification Number EIN, was
incorporated in the State of State on March 16, 19XX as CO-1
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) recognized the CO-1 (now the
Foundation) as a tax-exempt organization described in section
501(c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code by letter dated January
26, 19XX.

The Foundation states its mission on its Form 990 for 20XX as
follows: “To educate the public about and to support and fund
scientific research to develop new methods of Motto.”

On its Form 990 for 20XX, the Foundation states, “Its goal is
the extension of the Motto. In achieving its goals, ORG
supports groundbreaking research on therapies to extend the
Motto by seeking methods to

On its Form 990 for 20XX, the Foundation states that it “is
dedicated to finding new scientific methods for eradicating old
age, disease and death. Its exempt purpose includes
groundbreaking research on therapies to extend the Motto by
seeking methods to .”

In a letter dated November 25, 20XX, the Foundation states that
its “primary activity is to provide grants for scientific
research in the field of -biological research.”

The Foundation reported no compensation to any of its Directors,
DIR-1, DIR-2, DIR-3, DIR-4, DIR-5, and DIR-6 on its Form 990 for
20XX. In addition, it reported no compensation of the five
highest paid employees other than officers, directors, and

Form 886-Aev.4-68) Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service

Form 886 A Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service Schedule No. or
Explanation of Items Exhibit
Name of Taxpayer Year/Period Ended
ORG 20XX, 20XXK &
20XX

trustees and no compensation of the five highest paid
independent contractors (for other than professional services)
during 20XX. Further, it reported no salaries and wages of
employees not included in the above categories on Part II, Line
26 of its Form 990 for 20XX. In Statement 5 attached to its
Form 990 for 20XX, the Foundation did report “Salary-Executive
Director” in the amount of $ and “Payroll Taxes” in the amount
of $.

The Foundation also states in its Form 990 for 20XX that it
“funded through grants, in excess of $ to the following research
facilities ... . . CO-2, CO-3, CO-4, CO-5, and CO-6. “

When asked to provide a copy of the grant application used by
the Foundation, it responded in its letter dated November 25,
20XX, “The Foundation does not have a formal grant application.”
In the same letter, it described its criteria for grant award
decisions as follows:

Initially, the funding decisions were made based
upon the types of research already being
conducted by the recipient entities and
scientists. The world of -biological research
is conducted by a limited number of scientists,
and so the scientists on the Board of Directors
were generally familiar with the organizations
and scientists who were best positioned to
conduct the types of research that the Foundation
wished to fund in furtherance of its exempt
purpose. These decisions were made through an
ongoing process of oral discussions, board
meetings, review of scientific results, and
laboratory site visits by Board members.

The Foundation is funded primarily by amounts it terms as
“membership dues and assessments” and “Royalty Income — Co-9."
For 20XX, it reported revenue on its Form 990 in the amount of §$
in Part 1, Line 3, from “Membership dues and assessments.” It
also reported “Other revenue” in the amount of $$ in Part l,
Line 11. In Part VII, Line 103b, it reported the source of the
amount of $$ as “Royalty Income - Co-9.” As noted above, it
reports no key employees and no salaries paid to directors.

Form 886-A rev.4-68) Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service

Page: 2-

Form 886-A Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service Schedule No. or
Explanation of Items Exhibit
Name of Taxpayer Year/Period Ended
ORG 20XX, 20XX &
20X0X

In Part VII of its Form 990 for 20XX, the Foundation explains
how each activity for which income is reported in column E of
Part VII contributed importantly to the accomplishment of the
organization’s exempt purpose (other than by providing funds for
such purposes) as follows:

“To support scientific and medical research and gather and
publish information relating to Motto.”

During the on-site examination, the Foundation provided
brochures used by the Foundation. In one brochure, CO-7 members
are encouraged to “Sign up for ORG Membership!” and receive (1)
a 6-month subscription to.the CO-8, (2) discounts of % to % on
all ORG products, (3) direct access via toll-free numbers to
knowledgeable health advisors “who can help you personalize a
unique ORG program... ,” (4) a ORG Product Directory (“a
comprehensive listing of products and therapies from around the
world, many available only from ORG,” (5) “access to mail-order
blood testing kits that can help you identify correctable
disease risk factors,” and (6) “[o]ne bottle of ORG’s Vitamin.”

All these benefits are provided for a six-month membership fee
of $. The brochure also states that ORG is “the world’s largest
non-profit organization dedicated to ongoing research in Motto”
and that “ORG offers you the most advanced ORG therapies in the
world as they are developed.”

Another brochure offers 12 issues of CO-8 and a free one-year
membership for $. The brochure states that the offer expires
February 28, 20XX.

A third brochure states that “ORG is the world’s premier
organization dedicated to investigating scientific therapies to
promote Motto.” It also states the following:

The ORG financially supports innovative research projects
seeking to Motto. ORG maintains contact with leading
medical and Researchers around the world to
obtain the latest breakthroughs. The ORG is
a renowned leader in developing pharmaceutical grade and
pharmaceutical quality supplements.

Form 886-Aev.4-68) Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service
Page: -3-

Form 886-A Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service Schedule No. or
Explanation of Items Exhibit
Name of Taxpayer Year/Period Ended
ORG 20XX, 20XXK &
20XX

This brochure provided a brief description of some of the most
popular products ORG members take to stay healthy.

A letter to former members provides a brochure describing “only
a few of the 600 pharmaceutical quality supplements available to
Foundation members at near wholesale prices.” The letter
offers renewal of membership for $ and “up to § (retail value)
worth of any products offered by the ORG - ABSOLUTELY FREE.”

The letter states that the offer expires October 30, 20XX.

The activities of the Foundation and CO-9 are intertwined.
“Royalty fees” paid to the Foundation are likely included in
deductions taken by the CO-9 as are salary expenses.

The magazines sent to members contain many advertisements for
nutritional supplements sold by CO-9 and include CO-9 order
forms for the products advertised. Further, an advertisement
for a particular product often follows an article touting its
benefits. In a letter dated November 25, 20XX, the Foundation
stated that the “CO-9 provides the magazines free of charge to
the Foundation and its members.” In the same letter, the
Foundation stated, “The CO-9 does not have any members.”

The top inside cover of January of 20XX issue of the “ORG”
magazine states the following: “At the end of each year, prices
are discounted on all products offered by the ORG. The annual
sale enables members to obtain pharmaceutical-grade supplements
at prices substantially below what commercial companies charge.”

At the bottom of the inside cover, the same issue states the
following: “The sale extends to January 31, 20XX. Members
traditionally take advantage of the sale to stock up on a year’s
supply of their favorite supplements. To place your order, call

or visit website. (sale pricing available only to members in

the US, Country, and Country.) ”

The same issue of the magazine contains a 12-page order form in
the back that lists over 1,000 different supplements, 40 books,
and 25 different blood tests that can be ordered.

The name “ORG” was used by another organization until June 15,
20XX, when CO-1 and the former ORG agreed that CO-1, would

Form 886-A rev.4-68) Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service
Page: -4-

Form 886-A Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service Schedule No. or
Explanation of Items Exhibit
Name of Taxpayer Year/Period Ended
ORG 20XX, 20XX &
20XX

change its name to ORG and the former ORG would change its name
to ORG-1 See Exhibit I.

Exhibit III, pages 4 and 5 states, in 19XX, the directors of the
ORG-1, (Society) formerly ORG, stated that its involvement in
health product sales was interfering with its charitable and
educational activities. The Society directors also determined
that CO-1, (now the Foundation) was in a better position to sell
the health nutrients and health supplements activities to a for-
profit entity. The transfer of the Society’s health products
sales operation to CO-1, (now the Foundation) occurred on
December 31, 19XX; the Foundation then sold the health
supplements sales operation to for-profit corporation ORG,
(CO-9) on the same day, Dec. 31, 19XX. The transaction did not
include ownership rights to “DIRECTOR” (including associated
goodwill), membership list or non-operating assets or
liabilities. Please also refer to Exhibit II.

The CO-9 was incorporated in State on December 6, 19XX. On
December 31, 19XX, it purchased “inventory, licensing rights,
customer mailing lists and certain other intangibles [from the

Foundation] for $.” (See Exhibit VII, p. 3 of CO-9 stock
valuation report.) The CO-9 employed 120 people in 20XX; its
corporate headquarters are located in , State.

It also maintains a distribution center in State. Id. In 20Xx,
the CO-9 had 112,000 active members and 23,000 subscribers to
its monthly magazine. Id. We note that the CO-9 stock valuation
report’s statement concerning the number of members of the CO-9
contrasts with the response by the Foundation that the CO-9 had
no members.

Accounting and Trust Agreement (Exhibit IT)

On December 31, 19XX, the health product business was
transferred from the original ORG (now Society) to CO-1 (now
Foundation). The health product business was then sold to CO-9
a for-profit entity. See the “Recitals” section of the
Accounting and Trust Agreement, Exhibit II.

The Accounting and Trust Agreement recites the following: ORG,
(now Society), CO-1 (now Foundation), and the CO-9 engaged in
two transactions on Dec. 31, 19XX: (1) ORG, (now Society)
transferred certain assets and liabilities to the CO-1 (now

Form 886-A Rev.4-68) — Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service
Page: -5-

Form 886-A Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service Schedule No. or
Explanation of Items Exhibit
Name of Taxpayer Year/Period Ended
ORG 20XX, 20XX &
20XX

Foundation). The assets included its mailing list, inventory of
certain vitamins, health supplements and related items, its
name, logo, trademarks, tradenames, and certain other intangible
assets. (2) In the second transaction, CO-1 (now Foundation)
transferred to the CO-9 certain assets and liabilities. The
assets transferred consisted generally of the sale the health
nutrients and health supplements business, the granting of
licensing rights by CO-1 (now Foundation), and the licensing of
the mailing list.

According to the “Recitals” in the Accounting and Trust
Agreement, on May 28, 19XX, effective December 31, 19XX, the
parties executed a contract of Sale and Assignment of Lease to
document the transfer of inventory items and a Royalties
Agreement to document the granting of licensing rights and
mailing list license agreement. This formal agreement was not
executed until July 20, 19XX, even though the transfer of assets
took place on Dec. 31, 19XX. Other agreements, including oral
agreements were in place before the Accounting and Trust
Agreement was formalized in writing.

The Accounting and Trust Agreement affirms the health product
business was not conducted by the Foundation, but was initially
conducted by the Society. The Society transferred its health
product business to the Foundation; the health product business
was then purchased from the Foundation by the Co-9.

_. percent shareholder, Trustees DIR-3 and DIR-2; CO-10 is a
percent shareholder, Trustee DIR-2; and’ | percent is now owned
by the. Foundation.

Business Valuation Report (Exhibit IIT)

The fair market value of the health products business
transferred to CO-1, (now Foundation) by the Society was
determined in an appraisal dated January 19, 20XX. The nature of
the business was described as mail-order vitamins, vitamin
supplements and retail outlets. The fair market value of the
business transferred to the Foundation by the Society was
determined to be $, as of December 31, 19XX.

Form 886-A Rev.4-68) Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service
Page: -6-

Form 886 A Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service Schedule No. or
Explanation of Items Exhibit
Name of Taxpayer Year/Period Ended
ORG 20XX, 20XX &
20XX

The fair market value of the business sold to the CO-9 by the
Foundation was determined to be $, as of Dec. 31, 19XX. The
business transferred to the CO-9 specifically excluded the name,
logos, trademarks, trade names, service marks, and related
goodwill, the membership list; and the non-operating assets and
liabilities.

Amended Royalties and License Agreement (Exhibit IV)

The Amended Royalties and License Agreement between the
Foundation and the CO-9, dated March 1, 20XX states at Recital
B, “The parties have agreed that CO-9 shall pay Foundation a
royalty as specified herein, based upon CO-9’s sales, for CO-9's
use of Foundation’s name, logo, trademarks, service marks,
tradenames, trade dress, and other intangible assets,
(collectively, “DIRECTOR”) all of which are owned by
Foundation.” The Foundation reported receipt of yearly
royalties in the amounts of $$ in 20XX, $ in 20XX, and $ in 20XX
on its Forms 990.

Product Expense Agreement (Exhibit V)

The Foundation entered into a Product Expense Agreement with the
CO-9 on February 20, 20XX. In the Product Expense Agreement,
the Foundation agrees to distribute annual renewal notices to
individuals who are currently members. The renewal notices
encourage members to pay annual dues to the Foundation in order
to receive educational material, discounts on health products
sold by the CO-9 and other benefits. The Foundation and the CO-9
agreed that the Foundation will pay $ to the CO-9 for each
renewing member for the cost of health products shipped to each
renewing member. The Product Expense Agreement states that the
approximate retail value of the health products offered to each
renewing member is $ and that the $ valuation was determined as
of January 1, 20XxX.

The Foundation reported receipt of total membership fees for the
years 20XX, 20XX, and 20XX, in the respective amounts of §S, §,
and $. Of these amounts, the Foundation reported paying to the
CO-9 the amounts of $, $, and $ for products offered to members
for membership fees.

‘

Expense Agreement (Exhibit VI)

Form 886-A rev.4-68) Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service
Page: -7-

Form 886 A Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service Schedule No. or
Explanation of Items Exhibit
Name of Taxpayer Year/Period Ended
ORG 20XX, 20XX &
20XX

The Foundation also entered into an Expense Agreement with the
CO-9. The Expense Agreement states the following:

The parties agree that expenses shall be
shared between the parties in the following
percentages: CO-9 shall pay % of said
expenses and Foundation shall pay % of said
expenditures based upon the parties’
relative interests in said mailings. The
parties’ relative interests reflect the
historical relationship of the parties and
the historical pattern of payments for the
above-defined expenses after an arm’s length

negotiation.

The Expense Agreement addresses the sharing of expenses for the
distribution of educational materials, materials distributed to
attract new members, and printing and postage expenses related
to the membership drives.

Convertible Debentures and CO-9 Stock Valuation
(Exhibit VII)

The Foundation purchased two convertible debentures, one each
from the DIR-3 Revocable Trust and the CO-10, issued by the CO-9
on September 18, 20XX. Each debenture was valued at §$ and
reported as an investment on the 20XX Form 990 balance sheet.
Unless paid earlier, all accrued interest and the unpaid amount
will be due on September 18, 20XX. The Foundation provided a
valuation opinion of CO-9 stock as of December 15, 20XxX,
prepared by CO-11 which valued a 1 percent common stock interest
in the CO-9 at S$.

Promissory Note/Payments Received (Exhibits VIII-A and VIII-B)

When the CO-9 initially purchased the health product business,
the venture was financed through the Foundation. During the tax
years 20XX, 20XX, and 20XX, various amounts were due to be paid
to the Foundation by the CO-9. In January 13, 20XX a promissory
note, the CO-9 promised to pay $ to the Foundation on demand or
before 90 days from the date of the note. The note had a
provision for interest and the amount due was paid to the

Form 886-A rev.4-68) a Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service _
Page: -8-

Form 886 A Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service Schedule No. or
Explanation of Items Exhibit
Name of Taxpayer Year/Period Ended
ORG 20XX, 20XX &
20XX

Foundation. Loans and notes between the Foundation and the CO-9
were generally unsecured loans. See Exhibit VIII-A. During 20Xx
the CO-9 made payments of principal and interest to the
Foundation in the total amount of $; at the end of 20XX, the
total amount due to the Foundation from the CO-9 was $. See
Exhibit VIII-B.

Grants

The Foundation’s primary expenditures were in the form of grants
provided to section 501(c) (3) organizations and for-profit
organizations that were conducting research relating to
extending human life. During the 20XX tax year, grants in the
amount of $ were provided to both exempt and for-profit research
organizations. The following grants were provided to for-profit
research organizations during 20XX: $ to CO-08; $ to CO-12; $ to
CO-13; and $ to CO-14.

The Foundation provided research grants in the total amount of §
in 20XX, generally to for-profit organizations: The total amount
of $ was provided to the following for-profit entities: $ to CO-
08; $ to CO-12; $ to CO-13; and $ to CO-14.

The Foundation provided research grants in the total amount of §
in 20XX. The total amount of § was provided to for-profit
organizations: $ to CO-08; $ to CO-12; $ to CO-13; and $ to CO-
14.

DIR-3, the Foundation’s board member and part owner of the CO-9
(though his trust), serves on the Board of Directors of the four
for-profit research organizations that were provided with
grants; DIR-3 was also acting as Chief Executive Officer of CO-
14 in 20XX. RA-1, also a member of the Foundation’s board and
part owner of the CO-9, serves on the board for CO-14. RA-1
owns shares out of more than , or less than .% of
the shares in CO-08. The majority of the shares of stock in CO-
13 and CO-08 are owned by the Foundation. Although the
Foundation publicizes the grants that it awards in scientific
trade journals, it has no formal grant application process. The
Foundation states that its directors continually reviewed the
progress of its funded research and awards grants based upon
that progress. (See Letter dated November 25, 20XX). Initially,
the funding decisions were based upon the type of research

Form 886-Aev.4-68)

Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service

Page: -9-

Form 886 A Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service Schedule No. or
Explanation of Items Exhibit
Name of Taxpayer Year/Period Ended
ORG 20XX, 20XX &
20XX

already being conducted by the recipient entities and
scientists. The world of -biological research was being
conducted by a limited number of scientists, and the scientists
on the Foundation Board who were familiar with the scientists
would provide insight to who should be funded.

The Foundation stated that funding decisions were made through
ongoing discussions, board meetings, review of scientific
results and laboratory site visits by the board members. The
supported for-profit organizations did not provide any financial
reports regarding how the funds were used, but did provide
reports regarding the research that is being conducted. CO-08
provided an operating budget for 20XX, with financial
information. The intellectual property funded by the grants is
owned by the research facilities that are conducting the
research. To avoid any appearance of private benefit flowing to
these research facilities as a result of the funded research,
the Foundation has required that the for-profit research
facilities issue stock to the foundation, so that if any of the
products are successful as a result of the research, the
Foundation will also benefit.

Employees/Donated Services

Generally, the Foundation does not have any employees and the
services that are provided to operate the organization are
provided by the CO-9. During 20XX, the Foundation had an
executive director, but the Foundation determined that it was
more cost efficient to operate the Foundation with the CO-9's
employees. The Foundation reports that donated services are
generally provided by the CO-9. The Foundation stated that the
following donated services were provided in 20XX by the CO-9:
executive allocation in the amount of $§, accounting services in
the amount of $, marketing services in the amount of $ and
shipping in the amount of $. The Foundation indicated that the
donated services are of a volunteer nature and consist of
bookkeeping services, legal services, mailing and postage
services and medical consulting services to the Foundation’s
members.

Website

Form 886-A rev.4-68) oe Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service
Page: -10-

Form 886-A Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service Schedule No. or
Explanation of Items Exhibit
Name of Taxpayer Year/Period Ended
ORG 20XX, 20KX &
20XX

The membership information is posted on the CO-9's website,

The Foundation stated that this website is the
property of the CO-9. The website was purchased by the CO-9 and
is now maintained by the CO-9. The Royalties Agreement entered
into between the parties in December of 19XX provided for a
payment to the Foundation from the CO-9 for use of the
Foundation’s name on the website. The CO-9 website is used to
sell health products, nutrients and health supplements for the
CO-9. The membership information on the website applied to the
Foundation.

When a membership is purchased, the following benefits are
generally available to the Foundation’s members:

" The cover price is $, but is sent #-page reference book
called BOOK. to new ORG members without additional charge.

" CO-8, an over 100-page monthly publication, filled with
medical research findings, scientific reports, and
practical guidance about using nutritional supplements and
hormones to A The magazine is produced by the Co-
9 and is the property of the CO-9; it contains articles and
advertising that promotes health products sales.

" Access to a toll-free phone line where members can speak
with health advisors and medical doctors about their
nutrition and health concerns. These advisors can also help
members design a personalized health maintenance program
that includes nutritional supplements and hormones.

" The ORG Product Directory a comprehensive listing of

vitamins, _ ___._.. supplements, and hormones.

" A % discount on nutritional supplements, vitamins and mail-
order blood testing services.

See Exhibits IX and X.
Membership mailings

The Foundation has various mailings to attract members; the
mailings generally offer the following to its members:

*" A 6 month subscription to CO-8.

" Discounts of % to % on all CO-9’s products. Special sales
throughout the year enable members to receive higher
discounts on these products.

_ Form 886-A (rev.4-68) a 7 ____ Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service

Page: -i1- a

Form 886 A Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service Schedule No. or
Explanation of Items Exhibit
Name of Taxpayer Year/Period Ended
ORG 20XX, 20XX &
20XX

" Direct access via a special toll-free-phone number to
health advisors who can help personalize a ORG program and
provide answers to health questions.

*" ORG Product Directory - a listing of products and therapies
from around the world, many available only from the CO-9.

*" Access to mail-order blood testing kits to help identify
correctable disease risk factors.

" Free product such as a bottle of “Vitamin”.

See Exhibit XI.
Membership Expenditures

The following membership expenditures are stated on the
Foundation’s Forms 990: (1) For 20XX, membership expenditures
included postage and shipping in the amount of $ and printing
and publications costs of $; (2) for 20XX, membership
expenditures included postage and shipping in the amount of $
and printing and publications costs of $; and (3) for 20XxX,
membership expenditures included printing and postage in the
amount of S.

LAW:

Section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code provides that an
organization described in section 501(c) (3) is exempt from
income tax. Section 501(c) (3) of the Code exempts from federal
income tax corporations that are organized and operated
exclusively for charitable, educational, and other specified
purposes, provided that no part of the net earnings inure to the
benefit of any private shareholder or individual.

Treasury Regulation section 1.501(c) (3)-1(c) (1) provides that an
organization will be regarded as "operated exclusively" for one
or more exempt purposes only if it engages primarily in
activities that accomplish one or. more of such exempt purposes
specified in section 501(c) (3). An organization will not be so
regarded if more than an insubstantial part of its activities is
not in furtherance of an exempt purpose. The existence of a
substantial nonexempt purpose, regardless of the number or
importance of exempt purposes, will cause failure of the
operational test. Better Business Bureau of Washington, D.C.,
Inc. v. United States, 326 U.S. 279 (1945).

Form 886-A rev.4-68) Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service
Page: -12-

Form 886 A. Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service Schedule No. or
Explanation of Items Exhibit
Name of Taxpayer Year/Period Ended
ORG 20XX, 20XXK &
20XX

Treasury Regulation section 1.501(c) (3)-1(d) (1) (ii) provides
that an organization is not organized or operated exclusively
for one or more exempt purposes unless it serves a public rather
than a private interest. Thus, to meet the requirements of this
subsection, it is necessary for an organization to establish
that it is not organized or operated for the benefit of private
interests, such as designated individuals, the creator or his
family, shareholders of the organization, or persons controlled,
directly or indirectly, by such private interests. Prohibited
private interests include those of unrelated third parties as
well as insiders. Christian Stewardship Assistance, Inc. v.
Commissioner, 70 T.C. 1037 (1978); American Campaign Academy v.
Commissioner, 92 T.C. 1053 (1989). Private benefits include an
“advantage; profit; privilege; gain; [or] interest.” Retired
Teachers Legal Fund v. Commissioner, 78 T.C. 280, 286 (1982).

Treasury Regulation section 1.501(c) (3)-1(d) (3) provides that
the “term ‘educational’, as used in section 501(c) (3) relates
to” the following:

(a) The instruction or training of the individual for the
purpose of improving or developing his capabilities; or

(ob) The instruction of the public on subjects useful to the
individual and beneficial to the community.

Treasury Regulation section 1.501(c) (3)-1(e) (1) provides that an
organization may meet the requirements of section 501(c) (3)
although it operates a trade or business as a substantial part
of its activities, if the operation of such trade or business is
in furtherance of the organization's exempt purpose or purposes
and if the organization is not organized or operated for the
primary purposes of carrying on an unrelated trade or business.
In Better Business Bureau of Washington D.C., Inc. v. United
States, 326 U.S. 279 (1945), the Supreme Court found that the
trade association had an "underlying commercial motive" that
distinguished its educational program from that carried out by a
university.

In American Institute for Economic Research v. United States,
302 F.2d 934 (Ct. Cl. 1962), the Court considered the status of
an organization that provided analyses of securities and

Form 886-Aev.4-68)__ noe ee Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service _
Page: -13-

Form 886-A Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service Schedule No. or
Explanation of Items Exhibit
Name of Taxpayer Year/Period Ended
ORG 20XX, 20XXK &
20XX

industries and of the economic climate in general. It sold
subscriptions to various periodicals and services providing
advice for purchases of individual securities. The Court noted
that education is a broad concept, and assumed for the sake of
argument that the organization had an educational purpose. The
Court concluded, however, that the totality of the
organization's activities, which included the sale of many
publications as well as the sale of advice for a fee to
individuals, was more indicative of a business than that of an
educational organization. The Court held that the organization
had a significant non-exempt commercial purpose that was not
incidental to the educational purpose and that the organization
was not entitled to be regarded as exempt.

The Claims Court in Easter House v. United States, 12 Cl. Ct.
476 (1987) held that an organization that provided health
services to unmarried mothers and their children as a part of
its adoption service did not operate exclusively for an exempt
purpose since the health services were provided only as a part
of the adoption services that were similar to those provided by
commercial businesses.

In Old Dominion Box Co. v. United States, 477 F2d 344 (4th Cir.
1973), the court held that operating for the benefit of private
parties constitutes a substantial non-exempt purpose.

Leon A. Beeghly v. Commissioner, 35 T.C. 490 (1960), provided
that where an exempt organization engages in a transaction with
a related interest with the intent to benefit the private
interest rather than the organization, exemption may be lost
even though the transaction ultimately proves profitable for the
exempt organization.

In Basic Bible Church v. Commissioner, 74 T.C. 846 (1980), the
court found that although the organization did serve religious
and charitable purposes, it existed to serve the private benefit
of its founders, and thus failed the operational test of section
501(c) (3). Control over financial affairs by the founder created
an opportunity for abuse and the need to be open and candid
about financial matters; the applicant failed to provide
information concerning financial affairs..

Form 886-A rev.4-68) _ _ Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service _
Page: -14-

Form 886-A Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service Schedule No. or
Explanation of Items Exhibit
Name of Taxpayer Year/Period Ended
ORG 20XX, 20XXK &
20XX

In United States v. American Bar Endowment, 106 S.Ct. 2426 (1986),
the Supreme Court held that an 501(c) (3) organization’s insurance
program constituted both the sale of goods and performance of
services and, therefore constituted a trade or business for
purposes of the computation of tax on unrelated business income.
The court determined that the manner in which the American Bar
Endowment conducted the activity was like that of a for-profit
insurance broker.

Payments for the use of trademarks, trade names, service marks,
or copyrights, whether or not payment is based on the use made
of such property, are ordinarily classified as royalties for
federal tax purposes. See Commissioner v. Affiliated
Enterprises, Inc., 123 F.2d 665 (10° Cir. 1941); Commissioner v.
Wodehouse, 337 U.S. 369 (1949); Rohmer v. Commissioner, 153 F.2d
61 (2d Cir. 1946); and Sabatini v. Commissioner, 98 F.2d 753 (
2d Cir. 1938). Royalties are excluded from the computation of
unrelated business income of exempt organizations. I.R.C. §

512 (b) (2).

In Revenue Ruling 68-489, 1968-2 C.B. 210, the Service
determined that a section 501(c) (3) organization will not
jeopardize its exemption even though it distributes funds to
organizations that are not themselves charities if the exempt
organization “ensure[s]” that the funds are used for permitted
purposes by limiting distributions to specific projects that
further its own purposes. The exempt organization must also
retain control and discretion as to the use of the funds and
maintain records establishing that the funds were used for
section 501(c) (3) purposes.

Taxpayer's Position:

The Foundation states that it works to further its charitable
purpose through promoting the healthy extension of life through
publications that are provided to its members, such as the

CO-8, the book, BOOK, and articles and information posted on the
website.

The Foundation also states that its primary activity is to
provide grants for scientific research in the field of -
biological research. It states further that the grants provided
to the for-profit organizations are charitable in nature, even

Form 886-A rev.4-68) Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service

Page: -15-

Form 886 A Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service Schedule No. or
Explanation of Items Exhibit
Name of Taxpayer Year/Period Ended
ORG 20XX, 20XXK &
20XX

though formal grant applications and financial accounting are
not required. In addition, the Foundation states, “Due to the
specific specialized nature of the scientific research, it is
primarily conducted by a small number of research facilities, in
addition to scientists at certain universities.” It adds that
the research facilities equipped to conduct this type of
research are well aware of the Foundation as a potential funding
source for -biological research.

The Foundation also indicated that the Board of Directors, in
particular DIR-3, closely supervises the scientific research and
serves on the Board of Directors of the supported for-profit
organizations. The Foundation stated that it makes the research
results available to the general public and that the Foundation
has required the for-profit organizations to issue stock to the
Foundation so that the Foundation will benefit if any products
are successful as a result of this research.

The Foundation’s position concerning the agreements such as the
Accounting and Trust Agreement, Royalties Agreements, Product
Expense Agreement, Expense Agreement, Debentures, and Promissory
Notes to the CO-9 is that they are arm’s-length transactions.
The Foundation obtained appraisals or used historical
information to determine reasonable interest rates and
compensation to be paid by the CO-9. The Foundation also
maintains that the original purchase agreement with the CO-9 was
at arm’s-length. The Foundation states that it did not find it
necessary to require securitization of the CO-9’s debt.

The Foundation stated that the website is the property of the
CO-9 and that the CO-9 entered into a Royalties Agreement for
the use of the Foundation’s name. In addition to being used to
solicit sales of the CO-9’s products, the website is also used
to provide the results of the scientific research to both
members and to the general public and to solicit membership in
the Foundation. The CO-9 does not have any members.

It is the Foundation’s position that the Product Expense
Agreement’s provision for payments from the Foundation to the
CO-9 for the products provided to the Foundation’s members
provides reimbursement, for products provided to the Foundation's
members. Rather than percent of the membership dues being
paid to the Foundation, CO-9 first receives the membership dues

Form 886-A rev.4-68) Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service
OO OO Page: -16-

Form 886 A Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service Schedule No. or
Explanation of Items Exhibit
Name of Taxpayer Year/Period Ended
ORG 20XX, 20KX &
20XX

and then divides the money pursuant to the Product Expense
Agreement. The Foundation states that the Product Expense
Agreement is an arm’s-length transaction:

Government’s Position

The Foundation appears to have provided some funding for
research and the magazines and additional information sent to
its members appear to provide some educational information on
nutrition and health; nevertheless, the Foundation operates to a
more than insubstantial extent for the non-exempt purpose of
aiding in the sale of nutritional supplements, publications, and
blood testing services by a for-profit entity.

In addition, much of the funding for research aids for-profit
research organizations with which the founders of the Foundation
are associated. The Foundation has no written grant application
form and no published criteria for grant selection. No financial
reports were provided to ensure that the funds were spent for
exempt purposes. See Rev. Rul. 68-489, 1968-2 C.B. 210.

Since the Foundation receives stock from the research
organizations to which it awards grants, the grant funding could
be viewed as the purchase of stock rather than distribution of
grant funds. The selection committee for the grants consists of
the Foundation’s board, of which DIR-3 and DIR-2 are members.
DIR-3 serves on the Board of Directors of the four for-profit

organizations (CO-08, CO-13, CO-14, and ,) that
received yearly grants. DIR-3 was also acting as Chief Executive
Officer of CO-14 in 20Xx; served on CO-14 Board of
Directors.

The sale of the health product business to the CO-9 may not have
been an arm’s-length transaction. The health product business
was sold to the CO-9, of which the shareholders were the DIR-3
Revocable Trust and of the CO-9) and DIR-2’s CO-10. Although the
health product business was sold on December 31, 19XX, the
official appraisal regarding the value of the health product
business was not obtained until January 19, 20XX. See Exhibits
II and III.

The Product Expense Agreement requires the Foundation to
distribute annual renewal notices to individuals who are

Form 886-A rev.4-68) Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service

Form 886-A Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service Schedule No. or
Explanation of Items Exhibit
Name of Taxpayer Year/Period Ended
ORG 20XX, 20XXK &
20XX

currently members. The members pay annual dues to the Foundation
to receive educational material, discounts on health products
sold by the CO-9 and other benefits relating to improving and
extending life. The Foundation and the CO-9 agreed that the
Foundation will pay $ to the CO-9 for each renewing member for
the cost of health products shipped to each renewing member. The
publications received by the renewing members are marketing
tools for the sale of the CO-9’s products. Total membership fees
reported for the years 20XX, 20XX, and 20XX, respectively, were
$, $, and $. During the years 20XX, 20XX, and 20Xx,
respectively, the amounts of $, $ and $ were paid to the CO-9

' for products, based on the Product Expense Agreement.

The website is owned by CO-9 and the Royalties Agreement allows
for the use of the Foundation’s name on the website. Of the
amount paid by each renewing member, $ is paid to the CO-9 for
the cost of health products shipped to each. As noted above,
during the years 20XX, 20XX, 20XX, respectively, the amounts of
$, $, and $ of the renewing membership dues were paid to the Co-
9 for products based the Product Expense Agreement. A large
portion of the membership dues ostensibly paid to the Foundation
is actually paid to the CO-9 for the health product sales.

The touted membership benefits of the Foundation, such as the
magazine subscription, book, website information, CO-9
discounts, personal health plans all help to increase the sale
of the CO-9's products.

Although the magazines, books, website, and personal plan
information have provided some educational information to the
Foundation’s members on nutrition and good health, like the
organization in American Institute for Economic Research v.
United States, 302 F.2d 934 (Ct. Cl. 1962), a more than
insubstantial purpose of the Foundation appears to be the sale
of CO-9's products. Similarly, like Easter House, supra, its
exempt activities appear to be provided as a part of its
activities to further marketing of products in a manner similar
to those provided by commercial businesses rather than as the
exclusive purpose. The Foundation also resembles the trade
association in Better Business Bureau, supra, in that its
educational materials appear to have an "underlying commercial
motive."

Form 886-A rev.4-68) Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service

Form 886-A Department of the Treasury ~ Internal Revenue Service Schedule No. or
Explanation of Items Exhibit
Name of Taxpayer Year/Period Ended
ORG 20XX, 20XX &
20XX

Conclusion:

The Foundation is not operated exclusively for exempt purposes
within the meaning Section 501(c) (3) of Internal Revenue Code.
The marketing of health products to the benefit of a for-profit
business is a more than insubstantial purpose of the Foundation.
The Foundation’s tax-exempt status under Internal Revenue Code
501(c) (3) should be revoked as of January 1, 20XX.

If you agree, please sign the attached Form 6018 and return it
to the contact person. If you agree, please submit Forms 1120
(U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return) for the tax years 20XX,
20XX, 20XX and 20XX.

Form 886-A rev.4-68) Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service