PLR 1330019 grants a retroactive qualified electing fund election
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The IRS consents to an individual's retroactive qualified electing fund election for shares of a passive foreign investment company. The taxpayer became a U.S. resident, later sold the shares, and did not know the foreign company was a PFIC or that a QEF election was available. After learning of the additional filing responsibility, the taxpayer engaged another accounting firm and submitted affidavits describing the missed election and the professionals' roles. The consent is conditioned on following the timing and manner rules for making the retroactive election under Treas. Reg. § 1.1295-3(g).
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May the taxpayer make a retroactive QEF election for the described PFIC shares?
- Outcome: Approved, subject to compliance with Treas. Reg. § 1.1295-3(g).
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 1295 and 1297; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1295-3(f) and (g).
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201330019 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/26/2013 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1295.02-02
Person To Contact:
--------------------------- ---------------------, ID No. ------------------
------------------------------ Telephone Number:
---------------------------- ----------------------
Refer Reply To:
In Re: CC:INTL:B02
PLR-147180-12
Date:
April 22, 2013
Legend
Shareholder = ---------------------------
Taxpayer ID = -------------------
FC = ----------------------------------------
Accounting Firm A = -------------------------------------------
Accounting Firm B = ------------------------
Country 1 = ----------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 4 = -------
Year 5 = -------
Dear ----------------------:
This is in response to a letter dated September 24, 2012 submitted by your authorized
representative that requested the consent of the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue
Service (“Commissioner”) for Shareholder to make a retroactive qualified electing fund
(“QEF”) election under section 1295(b) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and
Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f) with respect to Shareholder’s investment in FC.
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted on behalf of Shareholder by its authorized representative, and accompanied
by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office
has not verified any of the material submitted in support of this request for ruling, such
material is subject to verification on examination. The information submitted in the
request is substantially as set forth below.
PLR-147180-12 2
FACTS
Shareholder is an individual that became a U.S. resident alien for U.S. federal income
tax purposes in Year 4. During Year 1, Shareholder acquired shares of FC, an entity
organized under the laws of Country 1 that was treated as a corporation for U.S. federal
income tax purposes. At all relevant times, FC was a passive foreign investment
company (“PFIC”) as defined in section 1297(a) of the Code. During Year 4
Shareholder sold all of her shares of FC.
During Year 5, Shareholder retained Accounting Firm A to prepare its Year 4 tax return.
Shareholder did not know or have reason to know that FC was a PFIC or that she, as
owner of the shares of FC, was eligible to make an election to treat FC as a QEF.
Accounting Firm A did not advise Shareholder of the availability of electing to treat FC
as a PFIC.
Subsequently, Shareholder heard through a friend that Shareholder had additional filing
responsibilities with respect to her investment in FC. Shareholder then sought advice
from Accounting Firm B. Accounting Firm B advised Shareholder of the option to elect
to treat FC as a PFIC and Shareholder immediately hired Accounting Firm B to assist
Shareholder in making the election.
Shareholder has submitted affidavits, under penalties of perjury, that describe the
events that led to her failure to make a QEF election with respect to FC by the election
due date, including the role of Accounting Firm A. Shareholder also submitted an
affidavit from Accounting Firm B, which describes Accounting Firm B’s engagement and
responsibilities, and the advice concerning the tax treatment of FC that it provided to
Shareholder.
Shareholder represents that, as of the date of this request for ruling, the PFIC status of
FC has not been raised by the IRS on audit for any of the taxable years at issue.
RULING REQUESTED
Shareholder requests the consent of the Commissioner to make a retroactive QEF
election with respect to FC for Year 1 under Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f).
LAW
Section 1295(a) provides that a PFIC will be treated as a QEF with respect to a
shareholder if (1) an election by the shareholder under section 1295(b) applies to the
PFIC for the taxable year; and (2) the PFIC complies with the requirements prescribed
by the Secretary for purposes of determining the ordinary earnings and net capital gains
of the company.
PLR-147180-12 3
Under section 1295(b)(2), a QEF election may be made for a taxable year at any time
on or before the due date (determined with regard to extensions) for filing the return for
the taxable year. To the extent provided in regulations, the election may be made after
the due date if the shareholder failed to make an election by the due date because the
shareholder reasonably believed the company was not a PFIC.
Under Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f), a shareholder may request the consent of the
Commissioner to make a retroactive QEF election for a taxable year if:
1. the shareholder reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, within the
meaning of Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f)(2);
2. granting consent will not prejudice the interests of the United States
government, as provided in Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f)(3);
3. the request is made before a representative of the Internal Revenue Service
raises upon audit the PFIC status of the company for any taxable year of the
shareholder; and
4. the shareholder satisfies the procedural requirements of Treas. Reg. §1.1295-
3(f)(4).
The procedural requirements include filing a request for consent to make a retroactive
election with, and submitting a user fee to, the Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(International). Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f)(4)(i). Additionally, affidavits signed under
penalties of perjury must be submitted that describe:
1. the events that led to the failure to make a QEF election by the election due
date;
2. the discovery of the failure;
3. the engagement and responsibilities of the qualified tax professional; and
4. the extent to which the shareholder relied on the professional.
Treas. Reg. §§1.1295-3(f)(4)(ii) and (iii).
CONCLUSION
Based on the information submitted and representations made with Shareholder’s ruling
request, we conclude that Shareholder has satisfied Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f).
Accordingly, consent is granted to Shareholder to make a retroactive QEF election with
respect to FC for Year 1, provided that Shareholder complies with the rules under
Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(g) regarding the time and manner for making the retroactive
QEF election.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.
PLR-147180-12 4
This private letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section
6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter
ruling is being sent to your authorized representative.
A copy of this letter ruling must be attached to any federal income tax return to which it
is relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this
requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control
number of the letter ruling.
Sincerely,
Jeffery G. Mitchell
Branch Chief, Branch 2
International
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.