PLR 1330003 extends the spending period for qualified school construction bond proceeds

Plain-English summary

The IRS grants a political subdivision an extension to spend available project proceeds from qualified school construction bonds. Construction delays caused by contractor defaults and the resulting corrective work made it unlikely that the project could be completed within the original three-year expenditure period. The IRS concludes that the delay was due to reasonable cause and that the issuer would continue spending the proceeds for qualified purposes with due diligence. The extension lasts until the date identified in the ruling.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: May the issuer extend the expenditure period for the qualified school construction bond proceeds?
• Outcome: Approved, the original expenditure period is extended to the stated date.
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 54A, 54E, and 54F.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201330003 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/26/2013 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 54F.00-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------------------- -----------------, ID No. --------------
---------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------------------------------- ----------------------
------------------------- Refer Reply To:
-------------------------------------- CC:FIP:B5
PLR-115818-13
Date:
April 24, 2013

LEGEND:

District = ---------------------------------------------------

State = ----------------------------

Bonds = --------------------------------------------------------------

School = ---------------------------------------------------------------

Date 1 = ---------------------------

Date 2 = ---------------------------

Date 3 = ---------------------------

Date 4 = ---------------------------

Dear -------------------:
PLR-115818-13 2

This is in response to your request under § 54A(d)(2)(B)(iii) of the Internal Revenue
Code for an extension of the expenditure period for the available project proceeds of
qualified tax credit bonds.

Facts and Representations

You make the following factual representations. District is a political subdivision of
State and provides educational services and facilities for grades kindergarten through
12.

District issued the Bonds on Date 1, and designated the Bonds as qualified school
construction bonds within the meaning of § 54F(a)(3). The original three-year
expenditure period for the Bonds under § 54A(d)(2)(B)(i) will expire on Date 2 (the
“Original Expenditure Period”).

All available project proceeds of the Bonds were to be spent on construction costs of
the School (the “Project”), and were expected to be spent before Date 2. The Project
began on Date 3, or shortly before the Bonds were issued. However, both the
subcontractor responsible for the School foundation and the subcontractor responsible
for the electrical system defaulted on their contracts and District had to pursue remedies
and correct the defective work. As a result of these unexpected delays, District does
not expect to complete the School by Date 2. Construction of the School is proceeding,
and District expects to spend all available project proceeds not later than Date 4.

District submitted this request for a ruling prior to Date 2.

Law and Analysis

Section 54A(d)(1) provides that a qualified school construction bond is treated as a
qualified tax credit bond for purposes of Section 54A.

Section 54A(d)(2)(B)(i) provides in part that to the extent that less than 100 percent of
the available project proceeds of the issue are expended by the close of the expenditure
period for 1 or more qualified purposes, the issuer shall redeem all of the nonqualified
bonds within 90 days after the end of such period.

Section 54A(d)(2)(B)(ii) provides that for purposes of this subpart, the term “expenditure
period” means, with respect to any issue, the 3-year period beginning on the date of
issuance. Such term shall include any extension of such period under clause (iii).

Section 54A(d)(2)(B)(iii) provides that upon submission of a request prior to the
expiration of the expenditure period (determined without regard to any extension under
this clause), the Secretary may extend such period if the issuer establishes that the
failure to expend the proceeds within the original expenditure period is due to
PLR-115818-13 3

reasonable cause and the expenditures for qualified purposes will continue to proceed
with due diligence.

Section 54A(d)((2)(C)(iv) provides that for purposes of this paragraph, in the case of a
qualified zone academy bond, a “qualified purpose” means a purpose specified in §
54E(a)(1).

Section 54A(e)(4) of the Code defines “available project proceeds” to mean (A) the
excess of (i) the proceeds from the sale of an issue, over (ii) the issuance costs
financed by the issue (to the extent that such costs do not exceed 2 percent of such
proceeds), and (B) the proceeds from any investment of the excess described in
subparagraph (A).

The Project was identified prior to the issuance of the Bonds and District reasonably
expected to spend all of its allocable available project proceeds within the three-year
period. The expected failure to spend all the available project proceeds of the Bonds by
the expiration of the three-year period on Date 2 has been caused by events that were
not reasonably expected at the time the Bonds were issued and were beyond the
control of District. However, District to the extent possible considering the described
unexpected external events that resulted in unforeseen delays, has and will continue to
exercise due diligence in spending the remaining available project proceeds on the
Project. District expects to spend all available project proceeds not later than Date 4.

Conclusion

Under the facts and circumstances of this case, we conclude that District’s expected
failure to expend the available project proceeds of the Bonds by Date 2 is due to
reasonable cause and that District’s continued expenditure of the proceeds for qualified
purposes will proceed with due diligence. Therefore, City is granted an extension of the
Original Expenditure Period with respect to the Bonds until Date 4.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with a Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to District’s authorized representative.
PLR-115818-13 4

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by District and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by
an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the materials submitted in
support of the request for a ruling, it is subject to verification upon examination.

                                      Sincerely,

                                      Associate Chief Counsel
                                      (Financial Institutions & Products)


                                                         /S/
                                      By: _________________________
                                          Timothy L. Jones
                                          Senior Counsel, Branch 5