Determination 1329019: IRS revokes a religious organization’s exemption over officer inurement and missing records

View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS revoked a religious organization’s exemption under IRC § 501(c)(3), effective January 1 of the redacted year. The organization spread Christian teachings through books, broadcasts, travel, and church activities, but its two officers controlled its accounts and used organizational funds for personal expenses. The organization did not provide enough bank records, receipts, invoices, or other documentation to establish business purposes for many expenses, including housing, food, medical costs, travel, and purchases. The IRS concluded that the repeated personal benefits and inadequate records showed private inurement and failure to satisfy the operational and recordkeeping requirements, and it required Form 1120 filings.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: Did the organization qualify for continued exemption under IRC § 501(c)(3) despite officer inurement and inadequate records?
• Outcome: Revocation, effective January 1 of the redacted year, with Form 1120 filing required for the affected tax years.
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 501(a), 501(c)(3), 162, 170, 262, 4958, 509, 6001, 6033, 7428; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.501(a)-1(c), 1.501(c)(3)-1, 1.162-17, 1.6001-1, 1.6033-2, 53.4958-4; Rev. Rul. 59-95; Rameses School of San Antonio, Texas, v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 20XX-85; Rueckwald Foundation, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 1974-298.

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

TE/GE EO EXAMINATIONS
" 1100 COMMERCE ST. MAIL STOP 4920 DAL 501.03-00
TAX EXEMPT AND

GOVERNMENT ENTITIES DALLAS, TEXAS 75242
DIVISION

February 20, 2013

Release Number: 201329019
Release Date: 7/19/2013

LEGEND Taxpayer Identification Number:
ORG -— Organization name Person to Contact:
XX — Date Address - address Employee Identification Number:

Date: February 20, 2013
Contact Numbers:
(Phone)

ORG (Fax)

ADDRESS

CERTIFIED MAIL

Dear

This is a final adverse determination regarding your exempt status under section 501(c)(3) of
the Internal Revenue Code (the Code). Our favorable determination letter to you dated
November 4, 19XX is hereby revoked and you are no longer exempt under section 501(a) of the
Code effective January 1, 20XX.

The revocation of your exempt status was made for the following reasons:

You failed to provide documents to establish that you operated exclusively for exempt purposes,
and that no part of your net earnings inured to the benefit of private shareholders or individuals.
(Code section 501(c)(3)) You failed to keep adequate books and records. (Code section 6001)

Federal income tax exemption is precluded if net earnings inure to the benefit of private
shareholders or individuals. (Treasury Regulation 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(2))

We previously examined your records for 20XX, and found inurement. We pursued correction
of the inurement. In reviewing your records for 20XX and 20XX, we again found inurement.
You paid the personal expenses of your officers and did not maintain documentation to support
the business purposes of the expenditures.

Contributions to your organization are no longer deductible.

You are required to file income tax returns on Form 1120. If you have not already filed these
returns and the examiner has not provided you instructions for converting your previously filed
Forms 990 to Forms 1120, you should file these income tax returns with the appropriate Service
Center for the tax year ending December 31, 20XX, and for all tax years thereafter in
accordance with the instructions of the return.

Processing of income tax returns and assessments of any taxes due will not be delayed should
a petition for declaratory judgment be filed under section 7428 of the Internal Revenue Code.

If you decide to contest this determination, you may file an action for declaratory judgment
under the provisions of section 7428 of the Code in one of the following three venues: United
States Tax Court, the United States Court of Federal Claims, or the United States District Court
for the District of Columbia. A petition or complaint in one of these three courts must be filed
before the 91° day after the date this determination was mailed to you if you wish to seek review
of our determination. Please contact the clerk of the respective court for rules and the
appropriate forms regarding filing petitions for declaratory judgment by referring to the enclosed
Publication 892. Please note that the United States Tax Court is the only one of these courts
where a declaratory judgment action can be pursued without the services of a lawyer. You may
write to the courts at the following addresses:

You also have the right to contact the Office of the Taxpayer Advocate. Taxpayer Advocate
assistance is not a substitute for established IRS procedures, such as the formal Appeals
process. The Taxpayer Advocate cannot reverse a legally correct tax determination, or extend
the time fixed by law that you have to file a petition in a United States court. The Taxpayer
Advocate can, however, see that a tax matter that may not have been resolved through normal
channels gets prompt and proper handling. You may call toll-free, 1-877-777-4778, and ask for
Taxpayer Advocate Assistance. If you prefer, you may contact your local Taxpayer Advocate
at:

If you have any questions, please contact the person whose name and telephone number are
shown in'the heading of this letter.
Sincerely yours,

Nanette M. Downing
Director, EO Examinations

Enclosures:
Publication 892, Exempt Organization Appeal Procedures for Unagreed Issues
Form 6018, Consent to Proposed Action - Section 7428

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Tax Exerapt and Government Entities Division

Exempt Organizations: Examinations

Attention: Jeffrey Davis, MailStop 39

4905 Koger Boulevard, Suite 102

Greensboro, NC 27407

Date: September 4, 2013
Taxpayer Identification Number:
Form:

Tax Year(s) Ended:

Person to Contact/ID Number:
Contact Numbers:

Telephone:
ORG Fax:
ADDRESS Manager’s name/ID number:

Manager’s contact number:
Response due date:

res

Certified Mail — Return Receipt Requested
Dear

Why you are receiving this letter

We propose to revoke your status as an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code (Code). Enclosed is our report of examination explaining the proposed
action.

What you need to do if you agree

If you agree with our proposal, please sign the enclosed Form 6018, Consent to Proposed
Action — Section 7428, and return it to the contact person at the address listed above (unless
you have already provided us a signed Form 6018). We'll issue a final revocation letter
determining that you aren’t an organization described in section 501(c)(3).

After we issue the final revocation letter, we'll announce that your organization is no longer
eligible for contributions deductible under section 170 of the Code.

If we don't hear from you

If you don’t respond to this proposal within 30 calendar days from the date of this letter, we'll
issue a final revocation letter. Failing to respond to this proposal will adversely impact your legal
standing to seek a declaratory judgment because you failed to exhaust your administrative
remedies.

Effect of revocation status
If you receive a final revocation letter, you'll be required to file federal income tax returns for the
tax year(s) shown above as well as for subsequent tax years.

What you need to do if you disagree with the proposed revocation

If you disagree with our proposed revocation, you may request a meeting or telephone
conference with the supervisor of the IRS contact identified in the heading of this letter. You also
may file a protest with the IRS Appeals office by submitting a written request to the contact
person at the address listed above within 30 calendar days from the date of this letter.

Letter 3618 (Rev. 6-2012)
Catalog Number 34809F

The Appeals office is independent of the Exempt Organizations division and resolves most
disputes informally.

For your protest to be valid, it must contain certain specific information including a statement of
the facts, the applicable law, and arguments in support of your position. For specific information
needed for a valid protest, please refer to page one of the enclosed Publication 892, How to
Appeal an IRS Decision on Tax-Exempt Status, and page six of the enclosed Publication 3498,
The Examination Process. Publication 3498 also includes information on your rights as a
taxpayer and the IRS collection process. Please note that Fast Track Mediation referred to in
Publication 3498 generally doesn’t apply after we issue this letter.

You also may request that we refer this matter for technical advice as explained in Publication

892. Please contact the individual identified on the first page of this letter if you are considering
     requesting technical advice. If we issue a determination letter to you based on a technical
     advice memorandum issued by the Exempt Organizations Rulings and Agreements office, no
     further IRS administrative appeal will be available to you.

Contacting the Taxpayer Advocate Office is a taxpayer right

You have the right to contact the office of the Taxpayer Advocate. Their assistance isn't a
substitute for established IRS procedures, such as the formal appeals process. The Taxpayer
Advocate can't reverse a legally correct tax determination or extend the time you have (fixed by
law) to file a petition in a United States court. They can, however, see that a tax matter that
hasn't been resolved through normal channels gets prompt and proper handling. You may call
toll-free 1-877-777-4778 and ask for Taxpayer Advocate assistance. If you prefer, you may
contact your local Taxpayer Advocate at:

For additional information

If you have any questions, please call the contact person at the telephone number shown in the
heading of this letter. If you write, please provide a telephone number and the most convenient
time to.call if we need to contact you.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Sincerely,

Nanette M. Downing
Director, EO Examinations

Enclosures:

Report of Examination
Form 6018

Publication 892
Publication 3498

moma

2 Letter 3618 (Rev. 6-2012)
Catalog Number 34809F

Schedule number or exhibit

Form 886-A
(Rev. January 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS

Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended
12/31/20XX

ORG EIN 12/31/20XX

LEGEND

ORG - Organization name EIN - ein XX - Date City - city State -

state Country - country BOOK - book President - president

Secretary - secretary CO-1 - 18* COMPANY

ISSUE:

Whether ORG qualifies for exemption under Section 501(a) as described in Section 501(c)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code?

FACTS:

ORG (the Organization) was formed and incorporated in the state of City on April 23, 19XX as “CO-1”.
The Organization was granted exemption from federal income taxes under Internal Revenue Code
(IRC) §501(a) as described in §501(c)(3) and further described in §170(b)(1)(A)(vi), under an
advanced ruling on November 4, of 19XX. After the advanced ruling period, the Organization was
granted its final determination letter on November 25, 19XX to remain exempt as described above.
CO-1 later changed its name to ORG (a date of the name change could not be obtained from the City
Secretary of State website).

The Organization was selected for examination due to an informant referral of suspicious activity that
led to a civil complaint against the Organization. The referral questioned the use of the funds given to
the Organization and felt the officers of the Organization, President, President, and Secretary,
Secretary and Treasurer, were using the Organization’s funds for their personal expenses. The
informant also had an outstanding civil lawsuit against the Organization and President for the return of
money loaned to the Organization.

After refusing multiple contact attempts, a report was prepared indicating the Internal Revenue
Service’s (IRS) intent to propose revocation of the Organization's tax exempt status because it failed
to provide the information required by the IRS for the purposes of inquiring into its tax exempt status.
The report was mailed to the President's post office box, via certified mail, on April 20, 20XX.

A phone call was received on May 9, 20XX from Secretary regarding the correspondence received
proposing revocation of its tax exempt status, and the Organization’s available options. Secretary
was notified that the organization had two (2) options:

1. Allow the examination of their books and records, or

2. Inthe event the organization does not want to agree to allow the examination, receive a 2-

week extension for the formal appeal due date.

Secretary indicated that they would allow for the examination of its books and records.
The examination of the Organization yielded that its activities included spreading the gospel of
Christianity throughout the country and world. The Organization is operated solely by President &
Secretary to spread the Christian gospel; the Organization would achieve its goal by producing books,
CDs, radio programs, televised programs, traveling house-to-house, and traveling to different
churches. The Organization has traveled from State, State, State, State, State, and even parts of
Country spreading the gospel of Christianity in person and on television broadcasts.

Form 886-A (1-1994) Gatalog Number 20810W Page 1 publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

Schedule number or exhibit

Foim 886-A
(Row January 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS

Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended

12/31/20XX
ORG EIN 12/31/20XX

The Organization’s Board of Directors met annually in the month of December. The Board consisted
only of President, the Organization’s President, and Secretary, the Organization's
Secretary/Treasurer. The meeting minutes of the Board of Directors consisted of a summary of the
Organization’s activities throughout the year. The meeting minutes listed the worldwide locations in
which it traveled to spread the gospel of Christianity, described the publishing and production of a
book “BOU" written by President, the production and recording of television programs, the
Organization’s plan for the following year to produce more books and television programs, and its
travel plans for the following year. The meeting minutes also indicated that the Organization decided
to move to City, State in 20XX, and relocate to City, State in the spring of 20XX. The Board of
Directors meeting minutes were devoid of financial reports and also lacked discussions about
personal expenditures made by President and Secretary. The Board of Directors meeting minutes
that were reviewed provided no evidence of financial oversight regarding the operations of the
Organization, and no evidence that President or Secretary had any limitations on their authority to
expend money.

To support its activities, the Organization received “love offerings” or contributions from individuals
and churches. The Organization also sent letters once or twice a month to “partners”, individuals and
churches the Organization has helped in the past, on its mailing list to solicit contributions. When
asked about the workings of the Organization’s financial assets and bank account(s), President &
Secretary indicated that only they have access to the Organization’s accounts, and they determine
how all the rnoney is spent.

The Organiation’s expenses were reviewed to determine whether the Organization’s income was
being used for the furtherance of its tax exempt purpose. Review of the bank statements yielded that
the Organization incurred various questionable expenses. The Organization incurred many ATM cash
withdrawals, restaurant expenses, grocery expenses, medical expenses, gas station and convenient
store expenses, home improvement store expenses, department store expenses, and mortgage and
rent expenses. Although requested on an Information Document Request (IDR) dated May 16, 20XX,
the Organization did not provide any cancelled checks, receipts, invoices, vouchers, or any other
source documents to determine the legitimate business reason for the expenses. Upon discovery of
the questionable expenses during the 20XX tax year, the examination was expanded to include the
20XX tax year.

A letter was prepared and mailed to the President's post office box, along with an additional IDR, on
June 8, 20XX. The IDR requested information for the tax year ending December 31, 20XX, as well as
information originally requested on the IDR dated May 16, 20XX for the 20XX tax year, but not
provided. Cancelled checks, receipts, invoices, vouchers, and any other source documents that verify
the amount-of expenses reported for the 20XX and 20XX tax years were requested. Additional bank
statements were also requested for all the Organization’s accounts, in particular accounts in which
transfers between accounts were noticed.

The Organization’s response to the latest IDR was received on June 22, 20XX. Along with other
requested information, The Organization provided information regarding a PayPal® account for the
20XX tax year, as well as additional bank statements, and information regarding some of the transfers
between accounts discovered during the 20XX tax year.

After review of the information received on June 22, 20XX, it was discovered that the Organization
again failed to provide a comprehensive collection of bank statements, cancelled checks, receipts,

Form 886-A (i-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page 2 _ publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

Schedule number or exhibit

Foim 886-A |
(Rev January 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS

Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended

12/31/20XX
ORG EIN 12/31/20XX

invoices, vouchers, and any other source documents that verify the amount of expenses reported for
the 20XX and 20XX tax years. An additional IDR was prepared and mailed to the Organization on
July 14, 20XX to again request bank statements, cancelled checks, receipts, invoices, vouchers, and
any other source documents that verify the amount of expenses reported for the 20XX and 20XX tax
years.

After receipt of the IDR, a telephone call was received from Secretary on July 22, 20XX indicating that
the Organization did not have copies of receipts, invoices, or source documents, and that it was not
cost-effective for the Organization to obtain the cancelled checks from the bank. Secretary also
inquired if the Service would request the information from the bank directly. Secretary was notified
that the source documents are needed to determine whether the Organization’s expenses qualify as
business expenses and not personal. Secretary was also told that the Service would not acquire the
cancelled checks from the bank directly because it is the Organization’s responsibility to substantiate
its Form 990 return, and maintaining cancelled checks and source documents is how the an
organization can authenticate what it reported on its Form 990 return; without the information, it could
result in the expenses of the Organization being reclassified as income to the officers.

The Organization’s initial response to the IDR dated July 14, 20XX was received on August 3, 20XX.
The Organization submitted some bank statements, but indicated that more bank statements, as well
as receipts that were found that span the 20XX and 20XX tax years, and would be sent in a separate
package. Additional responses to the IDR dated July 14, 20XX were received August 12, 20XX,
August 15, 20XX, August 16, 20XX, and August 23, 20XX.

The Organization submitted for review many loose receipts that accounted for purchases and
expenses paid fore during the 20XX and 20XX tax year, some of which were not legible. The
Organization did not provide any written explanations or any other additional supporting information
regarding the receipts.

The receipts and invoices provided by the Organization were reviewed against the transactions
discovered in the Organization’s bank statements. The provided receipts included numerous
restaurant receipts, grocery expenses, medical expenses, gas station and convenient store expenses,
home improvement stores, and department store expenses. The receipts did not include attachments
or reports that provided indication that the expenses incurred while traveling for the Organization, or
were made directly for the Organization. Many receipts and invoices indicated that the purchase was
made in the name of President or Secretary, not the Organization.

The receipts that were submitted by the Organization were taken into account for determining which
expenses qualified as legitimate business expenses. The Organization failed to provide any source
documents to substantiate many of the questionable expenses, a written position with regard to the
questionable expenses, how said expenses were ordinary and necessary business expenses and not
personal in nature. The Organization did not provide invoices for expenses that occur on a monthly
basis such as utility expenses.

Upon review of the canceled checks, the Organization issued checks to churches and other charitable
organizations, but also issued checks for transactions that seemed personal in nature. Review of the
canceled checks also yielded President and Secretary as the only signature authorities on all checks.

Form 886-AC(1!1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page 3 __ publish.no.irs.gov _- Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

Schedule number or exhibit

Form 886-A
(Rev. January 1994 EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS

Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended

12/31/20XX
ORG EIN 12/31/20XX

President was not provided a Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement, for the 20XX or 20XX tax years
by the Organization. The Organization however reported $ and $ in reportable compensation to
President on its Form 990 return for the 20XX and 20XX tax years respectively. No predetermined
salary or wages were designated for this individual; instead, the disbursements made for personal
expenses were reported as compensation on its Form 990 returns. The Organization did not provide
substantiation with respect to how the above figures were reached in determining the amount of
compensation for President.

President and Secretary indicated that they currently own a residence in State for which they have a
mortgage, but also rented a residence in City, State (throughout 20XX) and continue to rent a
residence in City, State. The Organization submitted Form 1098 Mortgage Interest statements for a
residence owned in State during 20XX and 20XX, and an executed residential rental agreement for a
State property during 20XX. The Organization did not submit any leasing or rental contracts for the
time spent in State.

The Organization’s Form 990 returns also indicated that President was paid a housing allowance of $
and $ for the 20XX and 20XX respective tax years. The Organization indicated that the housing
allowance-sovered the mortgage, utilities, taxes, insurance, and maintenance and repairs to the
officers’ primary residence in State, as well as the officers’ residences while in State and State. There
was no indication that a fair market value amount was designated as housing allowance prior to the
payment of the expenses.

The Organization failed to provide any source documents to substantiate many of the questionable
expenses, a written position with regard to the questionable expenses, how said expenses were
ordinary and necessary business expenses and not personal in nature to President and Secretary,
and the basis for these expenses to be excluded from the personal income of President and
Secretary. The total questionable expenses and transactions that could not be substantiated by the
Organization as legitimate business expenses totaled $ and $ for the 20XX and 20XX tax years
respectively. See EXHIBIT 1 for a breakdown of the questionable expenses.

The Organization’s Form 990 return for the 20XX tax year was previously examined by the Internal
Revenue Service. According to the final report of findings issued by the IRS for the prior examination,
it was determined that the Organization’s funds were disbursed specifically to pay for a significant
amount of personal expenses. The examination concluded with President being assessed the % “first
tier” tax as defined in IRC §4958(a)(1), on $ of excess benefit transactions received (and yearly
computed interest) or $ in additional tax due.

LAW:

Internal Revenue Code (IRC) §501(a) states that an organization described in subsection (c) or (d)
shall be exempt from taxation under this subtitle unless such exemption is denied under Section 502
(concerning feeder organization) or Section 503 (concerning organizations engaged in prohibited
transactions).

IRC §501(c) identifies in its subparagraphs the list of organizations referred to in subsection (a).

IRC §501(c)(3) exempts from taxation, corporations, and any community chest, fund, or foundation,
organized and operated exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, testing for public safety, literary,

Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page 4 __ publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

Form 886-A
(Rev. January 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS

Schedule number or exhibit

Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number

ORG EIN

Year/Period ended

12/31/20XX
12/31/20XX

or educational purposes, or to foster national or international amateur sports competition (but only if
no part of its activities involve the provision of athletic facilities or equipment), or for the prevention of
cruelty to children or animals, no part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private
shareholder or individual, no substantial part of the activities of which is carrying on propaganda, or
otherwise attempting, to influence legislation, and which does not participate in, or intervene in any
political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office.

IRC §501(d) states that the following organizations are referred to in subsection (a): Religious or
apostolic associations or corporations, if such associations or corporations have a common treasury
or community treasury, even if such associations or corporations engage in business for the common

benefit of the members, but only if the members thereof include (at

the time of filing their returns) in

their gross income their entire pro rata shares, whether distributed or not, of the taxable income of the
association or corporation for such year. Any amount so included in the gross income of a member

shall be treated as a dividend received.

IRC §509(a) states in part for purposes of this title, the term “private foundation” means a domestic or

foreign organization described in section 501(c)(3) other than

(1) an organization described in section 170(b)(1)(A), other than clauses vii and viii,

(2) an organization which

(A) normally receives more than one-third of its support in each taxable year

from any combination of —

(i) gifts, grants, contributions, or membership fees, and

(ii) gross receipts from admissions, sales of merchandise, performance of
services, or furnishing of facilities, in an activity which is not an unrelated
trade or business, not including such receipts from any person, or from

ae any bureau or similar agency of a governmental unit, in any taxable year
to the extent such receipts exceed the greater of $5,000 or 1 percent of
the Organization's support in such taxable year,

from persons other than disqualified persons (as defined in §4946) with
respect to the organization, from governmental units, or from organizations
described in section 170(b)(1)(A) (other than in clauses (vii) and (viii)), and

(B) normally receives not more than one-third of its support in each taxable year

from the sum of —

(i) gross investment income and

(ii) the excess (if any) of the amount of the unrelated business taxable

income over the amount of the tax imposed by

section 511.

IRC §170(b)(1)(A)(vi) states in part that an organization that normally receives a substantial part of its
support (exclusive of income received in the exercise or performance by such organization of its

Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page 5 __ publish.no.irs.gov

Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

Schedule number or exhibit

Form 886-A
(Rev. January 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS

Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended

12/31/20XX
ORG EIN 12/31/20XX

charitable, educational, or other purpose or function constituting the basis for its exemption under
section 501(a)) from a governmental unit or from direct or indirect contributions from the general
public.

IRC §162(a) states in part that there shall be allowed as a deduction all the ordinary and necessary
expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year in carrying on any trade or business, including —

(1) a reasonable allowance for salaries or other compensation for personal services
actually rendered;

(2) traveling expenses (including amounts expended for meals and lodging other
than amounts which are lavish or extravagant under the circumstances) while
away from home in the pursuit of a trade or business; and

(3) rentals or other payments required to be made as a condition to the continued
use or possession, for purposes of the trade or business, of property to which the
taxpayer has not taken or is not taking title or in which he has no equity.

IRC §262 provides in part that

(a) Except as otherwise expressly provided, no deduction shall be allowed for
personal, living, or family expenses.

(b) For purposes of subsection (a), in the case of an individual, any charge (including
taxes thereon) for basic local telephone service with respect to the 1st telephone
line provided to any residence of the taxpayer shall be treated as a personal
_ expense.
IRC §6001 states in part that every person liable for any tax imposed by this title, or for the collection
thereof, shall keep such records, render such statements, make such returns, and comply with such
rules and regulations as the Secretary may from time to time prescribe.

IRC §6033(a)(1) states in part that except as provided in paragraph (3), every organization exempt
from taxation under section 501(a) shall file an annual return, stating specifically the items of gross
income, receipts, and disbursements, and such other information for the purpose of carrying out the
internal revenue laws as the Secretary may by forms or regulations prescribe, and shall keep such
records, render under oath such statements, make such other returns, and comply with such rules
and regulations as the Secretary may from time to time prescribe.

IRC §6033(a)(3)(A) states in part that the above paragraph shall not apply to —
(i) churches, their integrated auxiliaries, and conventions or associations of churches,
(ii) any organization (other than a private foundation, as defined in section 509(a))

described in subparagraph (C), the gross receipts of which in each taxable year
are normally not more than $5,000, or

Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page 6 _ publish.no.irs.gov _ Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

Schedule number or exhibit

Form 886-A
(Rev. January 1994) . EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS

Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended

12/31/20XX
ORG EIN 12/31/20XX

(iii) the exclusively religious activities of any religious order.

Treasury Regulation §1.501(a)-1(c) states that the words “private shareholder or individual” in section
501 refer to persons having a personal and private interest in the activities of the organization.

Treasury Regulation §1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1) states in part that an organization will be regarded as
“operated exclusively” for one or more exempt purposes only if it engages primarily in activities which
accomplish one or more of such exempt purposes specified in section 501(c)(3). An organization will
not be so regarded if more than an insubstantial part of its activities is not in furtherance of an exempt
purpose.

Treasury Regulation §1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(2) states in part that an organization is not operated exclusively
for one or more exempt purposes if its net earnings inure in whole or in part to the benefit of private
shareholders or individuals.

Treasury Regulation §1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1) states in general

(i) An organization may be exempt as an organization described in section 501(c)(3)
if it is organized and operated exclusively for one or more of the following
purposes:

(a) Religious,
(b) Charitable,
(c) Scientific,
(d) Testing for public safety,
roc (e) Literary,
(f) Educational, or
(g) Prevention of cruelty to children or animals.

(ii) An organization is not organized or operated exclusively for one or more of the
purposes specified in subdivision (i) of this subparagraph unless it serves a public
rather than a private interest. Thus, to meet the requirement of this subdivision, it
is necessary for an organization to establish that it is not organized or operated for
the benefit of private interests such as designated individuals, the creator or his
family, shareholders of the organization, or persons controlled, directly or
indirectly, by such private interests.

Treasury Regulation §1.501(c)(3)-1(f)(2)(ii) states in part that in determining whether to continue to
recognize the tax-exempt status of an applicable tax-exempt organization described in section
501(c)(3) that engages in one or more excess benefit transactions that violate the prohibition on
inurement under section 501(c)(3), the Commissioner will consider all relevant facts and
circumstances, including, but not limited to, the following —

(A) The size and scope of the organization's regular and ongoing activities that
further exempt purposes before and after the excess benefit transaction or
transactions occurred;

Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page 7 __ publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

Schedule number or exhibit

Forin 886-A
(Rev. January 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS

Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended

12/31/20XX
ORG EIN 12/31/20XX

(B) The size and scope of the excess benefit transaction or transactions
(collectively, if more than one) in relation to the size and scope of the
organization's regular and ongoing activities that further exempt purposes;

(C) Whether the organization has been involved in multiple excess benefit __
transactions with one or more persons;

(D) Whether the organization has implemented safeguards that are reasonably
calculated to prevent excess benefit transactions; and

(E) Whether the excess benefit transaction has been corrected (within the meaning
of section 4958(f)(6), meaning in respect to any excess benefit transaction,
undoing the excess benefit to the extent possible, and taking any additional
measures necessary to place the organization in a financial position not worse
than that in which it would be if the disqualified person were dealing under the
highest fiduciary standards), or the organization has made good faith efforts to
seek correction from the disqualified person(s) who benefited from the excess
benefit transaction.

Treasury Regulation §1.501(c)(3)-1(f)(2)(iii) states that all factors will be considered in combination

• with each other. Depending on the particular situation, the Commissioner may assign greater or
  lesser weight to some factors than to others. The factors listed in paragraphs (f)(2)(ii)(D) and (E) of
  this section will weigh more heavily in favor of continuing to recognize exemption where the
  organization discovers the excess benefit transaction or transactions and takes action before the
  Commissioner discovers the excess benefit transaction or transactions. Further, with respect to the
  factor listed in paragraph (f)(2)(ii)(E) of this section, correction after the excess benefit transaction or
  transactions are discovered by the Commissioner, by itself, is never a sufficient basis for continuing to
  recognize exemption.

Treasury Regulation §1.501(c)(3)-1(f)(3) states that the rules in paragraph (f) of this section will apply
with respect to excess benefit transactions occurring after March 28, 20XX.

Treasury Regulation §1.162-1(a) states in part that business expenses deductible from gross income
include the ordinary and necessary expenditures directly connected with or pertaining to the
taxpayer's trade or business, except items which are used as the basis for a deduction or a credit
under provisions of law other than §162.... Among the items included in business expenses are
management expenses, commissions, labor, supplies, incidental repairs, operating expenses of
automobiles used in the trade or business, traveling expenses while away from home solely in the
pursuit of a trade or business, advertising and other selling expenses, together with insurance
premiums against fire, storm, theft, accident, or other similar losses in the case of a business, and
rental for the use of business property.... The full amount of the allowable deduction for ordinary and
necessary expenses in carrying on a business is deductible, even though such expenses exceed the
gross income derived during the taxable year from such business.

Treasury Regulation §1.162-17(d)(1) states that although the Commissioner may require any taxpayer
to substantiate such information concerning expense accounts as may appear to be pertinent in
determining tax liability, taxpayers ordinarily will not be called upon to substantiate expense account
information except those in the following categories:

Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page 8 __ publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

Schedule number or exhibit

Foim 886-A_
Few Janwary 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS

Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended

12/31/20XX
ORG EIN 12/31/20XX

(i) A taxpayer who is not required to account to his employer, or who does not
account;

(ii) A taxpayer whose expenses exceed the total of amounts charged to his employer
and amounts received through advances, reimbursements or otherwise and who
claims a deduction on his return for such excess;

(iii) A taxpayer who is related to his employer within the meaning of section 267(b);
and

(iv) Other taxpayers in cases where it is determined that the accounting procedures
used by the employer for the reporting and substantiation of expenses by
employees are not adequate.

Treasury Regulation §1.162-17(d)(2) states that the Code contemplates that taxpayers keep such
records as will be sufficient to enable the Commissioner to correctly determine income tax liability.
Accordingly, it is to the advantage of taxpayers who may be called upon to substantiate expense
account information to maintain as adequate and detailed records of travel, transportation,
entertainment, and similar business expenses as practical since the burden of proof is upon the
taxpayer to show that such expenses were not only paid or incurred but also that they constitute
ordinary and necessary business expenses. One method for substantiating expenses incurred by an
employee in connection with his employment is through the preparation of a daily diary or record of
expenditures, maintained in sufficient detail to enable him to readily identify the amount and nature of
any expenditure, and the preservation of supporting documents, especially in connection with large or
exceptional expenditures. Nevertheless, it is recognized that by reason of the nature of certain
expenses or the circumstances under which they are incurred, it is often difficult for an employee to
maintain detailed records or to preserve supporting documents for all his expenses. Detailed records
of small expenditures incurred in traveling or for transportation, as for example, tips; will not be
required.

Treasury Regulation §1.162-17(d)(3) states that where records are incomplete or documentary proof
is unavailable, it may be possible to establish the amount of the expenditures by approximations
based upon reliable secondary sources of information and collateral evidence. For example, in
connection with an item of traveling expense a taxpayer might establish that he was in a travel status
a certain number of days but that it was impracticable for him to establish the details of all his various
items of travel expense. In such a case rail fares or plane fares can usually be ascertained with
exactness and automobile costs approximated on the basis of mileage covered. A reasonable
approximation of meals and lodging might be based upon receipted hotel bills or upon average daily
rates for such accommodations and meals prevailing in the particular community for comparable
accommodations. Since detailed records of incidental items are not required, deductions for these
items may be based upon a reasonable approximation. In cases where a taxpayer is called upon to
substantiate expense account information, the burden is on the taxpayer to establish that the amounts
claimed as a deduction are reasonably accurate and constitute ordinary and necessary business
expenses paid or incurred by him in connection with his trade or business. In connection with the
determination of factual matters of this type, due consideration will be given to the reasonableness of
the stated expenditures for the claimed purposes in relation to the taxpayer's circumstances (such as
his income and the nature of his occupation), to the reliability and accuracy of records in connection

Form 886-Ai (1:1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page 9 _ publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

Schedule number or exhibit

Form 886-A
(Rev. January 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS

Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended

12/31/20XX
ORG EIN 12/31/20XX

with other items more readily lending themselves to detailed record-keeping, and to. all of the facts
and circumstances in the particular case.

Treasury Regulation §53.4958-4(c)(1) states in part that an economic benefit is not treated as
consideration for the performance of services unless the organization providing the benefit clearly
indicates its intent to treat the benefit as compensation when the benefit is paid. An applicable tax-
exempt organization is treated as clearly indicating its intent to provide an economic benefit as
compensation for services only if the organization provides written substantiation that is
contemporaneous with the transfer of the economic benefit at issue. If an organization fails to provide
this contemporaneous substantiation, any services provided by the disqualified person will not be
treated as provided in consideration for the economic benefit for purposes of determining the
reasonableness of the transaction.

Treasury Regulation §53.4958-4(c)(3)(i)(A) states in part that contemporaneous substantiation can be
demonstrated by:

(1) The organization reporting the benefit as compensation on an original or

: - amended Federal tax information return with respect to the payment (e.g. Form
W-2, 1099 or 990) provided that the amended form is filed before an examination
has been started on the organization or disqualified person; or

(2) The disqualified person reporting the benefit as income on an original or
amended Form 1040, provided that the amended Form 1040 is filed before an
examination has been started on the organization or disqualified person.

Treasury Regulation 1.6001-1(a) in conjunction with Treas. Reg. 1.6001-1(c) states in part that every
organization exempt from tax under IRC 501(a) must keep such permanent books or accounts or
records, including inventories, as are sufficient to establish the amount of gross income, deductions,
credits, or other materials required to be shown by such person in any return of such tax. Such
organization shall also keep such books and records as are required to substantiate the information
required by IRC 6033.

Treasury Regulation 1.6001-1(e) states that the books or records required by this section shall be
kept at all times available for inspection by authorized internal revenue officers or employees, and
shall be retained as long as the contents thereof may be material in the administration of any internal
revenue law.

Treasury Regulation 1.6033-2(i)(2) states in part that every organization which is exempt from tax,
whether or not it is required to file an annual information return, shall submit such additional
information as may be required by the Internal Revenue Service for the purpose of inquiring into its
exempt status.

Revenue Ruling 59-95 concerns an organization previously held exempt from Federal income tax was
requested to produce a financial statement as of the end of the year and a statement of its operations
during such year. However, its records were so incomplete that it was unable to furnish such
statements. The Service held that the failure or inability to file the required information return or
otherwise to comply with the provision of IRC Section 6033 and the regulations which implement it,
may result in the termination of the exempt status of an organization previously held exempt, on the

Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page_10___ publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

Schedule number or exhibit

Form 886-A
(Rev. January 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS

Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number . Year/Period ended

12/31/20XX
ORG EIN 12/31/20XX

grounds that the organization has not established that it is observing the conditions required for the
continuation of an exempt status.

In Rameses School of San Antonio, Texas, v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 20XX-85, an organization
was established as a nonprofit corporation under the laws of the State of Texas for the purpose of
operating a school providing education to children and initially received recognition as an organization
described in IRC §501(c)(3). The Commissioner contended that the taxpayer failed the operational
test imposed pursuant to Treasury Regulation §1.501(c)(3)-1(c) on grounds that the taxpayer was
operated to benefit the private interests of an individual who served as the taxpayer's executive
director, president, chief executive officer, and administrator (administrator), and that part of its net
earnings inured to her benefit. For instance, while the taxpayer's board approved a salary of $5,000
per month for the administrator, the taxpayer's payroll journal showed salary amounts in excess of
$5,000 per month for certain months. Although the administrator asserted that the excess amounts
were awaiced as reimbursement for money that she had loaned to the taxpayer, the documentation
that purportedly showed such loans had been altered. The administrator made unexplained cash
withdrawals on the taxpayer's account. There were also questionable lease agreements, signed only
by the administrator, that were never approved by the board. The administrator contended that the
taxpayer owned the property, but if this were true, the taxpayer had leased the property from itself
under the owner rental agreement. The court held that the taxpayer's tax-exempt status was properly
revoked.

In Rueckwald Foundation, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 1974-298, the taxpayer was a foundation
that qualified for an exemption from federal income taxes under IRC §501(c)(3). The qualification was
subject to the understanding that the taxpayer's operations conformed to those purposes stated in its
application. Because it failed to obtain a state license, the taxpayer changed its purpose. The
taxpayer's founder served as both its president and chairman. His mother was an invalid and his son
was in college. His mother's care fell to the founder, who found himself on the verge of bankruptcy.
The taxpayer entered into a number of transactions, the result of which were to provide it with income
that was exclusively used by the founder to defray his family's personal expenses. The IRS revoked
the taxpayer's §501(c)(3) exemption from federal income taxation and issued a notice of deficiency.
The taxpayer sought a redetermination and the court affirmed. The court held that the taxpayer's
income from all sources was available for the use of the founder's family, an arrangement neither
approved nor permitted under I.R.C. § 501(c)(3). The court held that the taxpayer failed to show that
it qualified for income tax exemption under I.R.C. §501(c)(3).

TAXPAYER'S POSITION:

ORG maintains that it has not done anything to warrant its tax exempt status revoked.

The Organization maintained that the expenses incurred by the Organization are necessary to
perform and continue its activities. The Organization travels to preach and spread the gospel of
Christianity throughout the country and world. This requires travel expenses which the Organization
covers. The personal expenses incurred by the officers of the Organization were considered wages
to President. All other expenses incurred by the Organization are necessary for the continued
operation of the Organization.

AL

GOVERNMENT'S POSITION:

Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page_11_ publish.no.irs.gov _ Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

Schedule number or exhibit

Form 886-A EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS

(Rev. January +244)

Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended

12/31/20XX
ORG EIN 12/31/20XX

The exempt status of the ORG should be revoked because it fails the operational test imposed
pursuant to Treasury Regulation §1.501(c)(3)-1(c) on grounds that the Organization inures to the
benefit of private shareholders, President and Secretary.

As officers of the Organization, President and Secretary are in charge of the day-to-day operations of

the Organization. President and Secretary both use the income from the Organization as they see fit.

This is evidenced by the numerous expenses incurred by the Organization that are personal in nature.
Purchases from nail salons, health spas, department stores, limousine services, and movie theaters in
no way qualify as a legitimate business expense for an Organization whose focus is on spreading the

gospel of Christianity throughout the country and world.

The Organization did not provide any documentation, mileage or automobile records, to substantiate
the gas station/convenience store purchases. The Organization travels throughout the country
preaching and spreading the gospel of Christianity, and indicated in its Board of Director meeting
minutes places in which the Organization had traveled during the year. However, the Organization
did not maintain or submit travel and mileage logs to substantiate its travel expenses. The board
meeting minutes also did not specify dates in which travel to the locations indicated. The
Organization failed to provide detailed accounts of all the Organization’s speaking engagements, or
other information to substantiate when, where, and the reason for the travel expenses. The summary
of locations visited listed in the Organization’s Board of Directors meeting minutes is not sufficient to
allow the travel expenses claimed. According to Treasury Regulation §1.162-17(d)(2), adequate
documentation should be maintained and presented to claim deductions for travel related expenses
and correctly determine the proper tax liability.

Source documents, receipts, cancelled checks, and other information were requested to substantiate
the Form 990 return, and the questionable transactions discovered from the Organization’s bank
statements. The Organization failed to provide bank statements for all accounts in which moneys
were deposited, transferred, or disbursed. Multiple transfers were made to bank accounts for which
no statements were provided for either the 20XX or 20XX tax years. While the Organization provided
some invoices and receipts to show proof of the expense, the business purpose of the expenses
could not be proven, and many receipts were deemed personal in nature. The many department
store purchases, restaurant purchases, entertainment purchases, gas station/convenience store
purchases, home improvement purchases, and all other expenses that could not easily be
distinguished as expenses incurred by a religious organization do not qualify as ordinary and
necessary business expenses as defined by IRC §162; instead, they inure to the benefit of President
and Secretary because they are in charge of the day-to-day operations of the Organization.

The gross misuse of the Organization's assets for their day-to-day survival is further evidenced by
President and Secretary’s payment for the upkeep of two (2) residences. President and Secretary are
able to maintain a residence in State, as well as State (during 20XX) or State (during 20XX) all by way
of the Orgarization’s assets. President and Secretary are the only individuals with control of the
Organization’s accounts. They used the Organization’s assets to pay the mortgage or rent for the two
(2) residenێs, home improvements on those residences, utilities and upkeep of the residences,
medical expenses for their family, and to purchase food at grocery stores and numerous restaurants.

As officers, President and Secretary are able to receive a substantial benefit from the Organization by
overseeing the day-to-day operations of the Organization as evidenced in the numerous personal

Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page_12 publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

a

Schedule number or exhibit

Form 886-A
(Rev. January 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS

Name of taxpayer’ Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended

12/31/20XX
ORG EIN 12/31/20XX

transactions identified in EXHIBIT 1; the amount of the unsubstantiated questionable expenses
totaled $ and $ for 20XX and 20XX respectively. President and Secretary were given credit for $ and
$ in compensation and housing allowance reported on the Form 990 return filed by the Organization
(Treasury Regulation 53.4958-4(c)(3)(i)(A) cited). Therefore, $ of the $ is considered to have
improperly benefited the officers in the 20XX tax year, and $ of the $ is considered to have improperly
benefited the officers in the 20XX tax year. .

Because President and Secretary are in charge of the day-to-day operations and expenses of the
Organization as its only officers, the $ and $, for 20XX and 20XX respectively, in unsubstantiated
expenses a/é considered excess benefit transactions and inured to the benefit of the officers. The $
in unsubstantiated expenditures during 20XX accounted for approximately % of the Organization's
income, and approximately % of the Organization’s expenses, while the $ in unsubstantiated
expenditures for 20XX accounted for approximately % of the Organization’s income and
approximately % of the Organization’s expenses.

The Organization was notified during the examination of its Form 990 for the 20XX tax year of the law
regarding excess benefit transactions. Excess benefit transactions received by a disqualified person
that is an officer is, logically, a form of inurement. The Organization has not performed responsibly or
operated with due diligence since the examination of its Form 990 for the 20XX tax year to reduce or
prevent further excess benefit transactions. The Organization has continued to operate in the manner
in which it operated for the 20XX tax year.

When excess benefit transactions occur, there is an inherent risk to the exempt status of the
organization. Some factors to consider regarding whether an organization remains exempt under IRC
§501(c)(3) are described in the subparagraphs of Treasury Regulation §1.501(c)(3)-1(f)(2)(ii). These
factors are applicable to excess benefit transactions that occurred after March 28, 20XX. The
transactions in which President and Secretary received an excess benefit were substantial as it
relates to the size of the organization. There was little oversight in the Organization's financial
operations to prevent further transactions prior to the Service’s inquiry into the Organization’s exempt
status for the years under examination. President and Secretary also have not yet made correction
for the excess benefit received. For all transactions that occurred after March 28, 20XX, based on the
factors identified in the treasury regulations identified above, the Organization's tax exempt status
would be in serious jeopardy. Although technically the regulations don't apply for transactions that
occurred before March 28, 20XX, similar principles would apply.

According to [RC §501(c)(3), no part of the net earnings shall inure to the benefit of any private
shareholder or individual; however, President and Secretary have received clothes, entertainment,
and other benefits from their role in the Organization. The private benefit received by President and
Secretary outweighs the benefits of the legitimate activities of the Organization. As evidenced by
Rameses School of San Antonio, Texas, v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 20XX-85, and Rueckwald
Foundation, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 1974-298, the loss of tax exempt status is warranted in
which private benefit of an individual occurs.

Not only does the Organization fail to qualify for its tax exempt status due to inuring to the benefit of a
private shareholder or individual, the Organization also fails to qualify for exemption due to failing to
meet the requirements of Treasury Regulation 1.6033-2(i)(2). As referenced by Revenue Ruling 59-
95, an organization exempt from taxation under IRC §501(a) that fails to submit such additional
information as may be required by the Internal Revenue Service for the purpose of inquiring into its

Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page 13 publish.no.irs.gov Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service

a

Schedule number or exhibit

Form 886-A>~
(Rev. January 1994) EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS

Name of taxpayer Tax Identification Number Year/Period ended

12/31/20XX
ORG EIN 12/31/20XX

exempt status may result in the termination of its exempt status. The Organization did not provide
documentation to substantiate numerous expenses incurred by the Organization. The Organization
has repeatedly been asked to submit information to the IRS for purposes of inquiring into its tax
exempt status, but has failed to provide the requested information.

The Organization has failed the operational test in various ways. The inurement received by
individuals, President and Secretary, outweighs the benefit of the charitable activities provided by the
Organization. The Organization also failed to maintain adequate records to substantiate the
information provided on its annual Form 990 return. The Organization’s failures in the operational test
outweigh its charitable activities; the Organization’s tax exempt status should be revoked.

CONCLUSION:

ORG does not qualify for tax exempt status under Internal Revenue Code §501(a) as described in
§501(c)(3). The financial inurement received by its officers, and the use of the Organization’s assets
by its officers for their personal use, demonstrate that the Organization has not met its obligations and
responsibilities to maintain tax exempt status under section 501(c)(3) of the Code. Revocation of the
tax exempt status of ORG is proposed with an effective date of January 1, 20XX.

Form 886-A (1-1994) Catalog Number 20810W Page 14 publish.no.irs.gov _ Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service