PLR 201327007: IRS grants a taxpayer more time to make a mixed straddle account election

Number
201327007
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Mixed Straddle Account
Code sections
§ 1092, § 1256, § 6110
Ruling dated
April 3, 2013
Publicly released
July 5, 2013

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2013
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS granted a corporate taxpayer an extension of time to make a mixed straddle account election for a tax year. The taxpayer's employee responsible for the federal consolidated tax return left without documenting the election requirements, and the remaining employees did not know the applicable rules. The taxpayer discovered the missed deadline while preparing a tax return, promptly sought tax advice, and requested a private letter ruling before the end of the tax year. The IRS concluded that these facts showed reasonable cause under section 1092 and allowed the election to be made within 30 days of the ruling.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did the taxpayer have reasonable cause for failing to make a timely mixed straddle account election, so that it could receive an extension?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1092, 1256, and 6110; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1092(b)-4T(a), 1.1092(b)-4T(b), and 1.1092(b)-4T(f)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201327007
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/5/2013
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1092.05-02
Person To Contact:
------------------
------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------ ID No. ------------------
--------------
Telephone Number:
-----------------------------
----------------------
----------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
-------------------------------
CC:FIP:B03
PLR-150464-12
Date:
April 03, 2013

LEGEND:

Taxpayer = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Company = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------
State X = -------------- Industry = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------
Fiscal Year = ------------------------ Year 1 = ------- Year 2 = ------- Employee 1 = ----------- Employee 2 = ---------------------- Date 1 = ---------------------------
PLR-150464-12
2

Dear -------------:

This letter responds to a letter dated November 26, 2012, submitted on behalf of Taxpayer by its authorized representative. Taxpayer requests an extension of time to file an election under section 1092(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and section 1.1092(b)-4T(f) of the Temporary Income Tax Regulations.

FACTS

Taxpayer, a State X entity taxed under subchapter C of the Code, is the US parent of a group of companies. Company is -----% indirectly owned by Taxpayer and is treated as a corporation under subchapter C of the Code for US federal income tax purposes. Company is also a controlled foreign corporation (CFC) of Taxpayer for purposes of subchapter F of the Code. Taxpayer and Company use an accrual method of accounting and a Fiscal Year for federal income tax purposes.

Taxpayer is not in the business of trading or dealing in financial positions. Rather, Taxpayer is in the business of Industry. In order to manage currency exposure, in Year 1, Company entered into several positions in various financial instruments that would be classified as mixed straddles under section 1092 of the Code. Taxpayer represents that Company completed a timely filed mixed straddle account election for this class of activities for Year 1 and intended to do so for Year 2.

In January of Year 2, Employee 1 (the person primarily responsible for preparation of the US federal income tax consolidated return) voluntarily ended her employment. Employee 1 did not leave instructions for her successor concerning mixed straddle account elections. Taxpayer had no other employees knowledgeable about section 1092, section 1256, or mixed straddle accounts. Taxpayer did not use any outside tax advisors for its mixed straddle account elections.

In August of Year 2, while reviewing and preparing the US consolidated tax return for Year 1, Employee 2 read the Income Tax Regulations under section 1092 of the Code to determine how to attach the mixed straddle account election to the tax return. When reading the regulations, Employee 2 determined that a mixed straddle account election has unique timing requirements and that the date to file a timely mixed straddle account election had passed. Taxpayer represents that immediately upon realization that there might be an issue with the election, it contacted a tax advisor and began the process of completing a request for a private letter ruling from the Commissioner that Taxpayer had reasonable cause for failing to make a timely election under section 1092(b)(2)(A)(i)(II) of the Code and section 1.1092(b)-4T(f)(1) of the Regulations. The request for private letter ruling was submitted before the end of the tax year for which the election was effective.
PLR-150464-12
3

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 1.1092(b)-4T(a) of the Regulations generally permits a taxpayer to elect (in accordance with paragraph (f) of section 1.1092(b)-4T) to establish one or more “mixed straddle accounts.” Section 1.1092(b)-4T(b) defines a mixed straddle account to mean an account for determining gains and losses from all positions held as capital assets in a designated class of activities by the taxpayer at the time the taxpayer elects to establish a mixed straddle account.

Section 1.1092(b)-4T(f)(1) of the Regulations generally provides that, except as otherwise provided, the election to establish one or more mixed straddle accounts for a taxable year must be made by the due date (without regard to any extensions) of the taxpayer’s income tax return for the immediately preceding taxable year (or part thereof). Section 1.1092(b)-4T(f)(1) further provides that if an election is made after the time specified above, the election will be permitted only if the Commissioner concludes that the taxpayer had reasonable cause for failing to make a timely election.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the facts and representations submitted, we conclude that Taxpayer has shown reasonable cause for failing to make a timely election under section 1.1092(b)-4T(f) of the Regulations. Therefore, we grant the Taxpayer’s request for an extension of time to make the election under section 1.1092(b)-4T(a) for the taxable year ending on Date 1. This extension will expire 30 days from the date of this letter. The election must be made in the manner prescribed in section 1.1092(b)-4T(f)(2) and filed with the Director having audit jurisdiction over the Taxpayer’s US federal income tax consolidated return.

Except as specifically ruled upon above, no opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction under the provisions of any other sections of the Code and Regulations which may be applicable thereto, or the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of or effects resulting from the transaction. Specifically, no opinion is expressed concerning whether the positions designated by Taxpayer as the class of activities is a permissible designation under section 1.1092(b)-4T(b)(2) of the Regulations.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-150464-12
4

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Robert B. Williams
Senior Counsel, Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Financial Institutions & Products)

Enclosures:
Copy of this letter
Copy for section 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace