Private Letter Ruling 1324025 Released June 13, 2013 Approved Transcribed from scan

PLR 1324025: IRS waives rollover deadlines after incorrect financial-institution advice

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2013
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Two employees received taxable distributions when their employer moved from one retirement plan to another. They intended direct transfers, but taxes were withheld, and a representative of the new plan incorrectly told them they could wait to deposit the withheld amounts until receiving tax refunds. The IRS waived the 60-day rollover requirement because the taxpayers relied on incorrect advice from a financial institution and had not used the distributed amounts for other purposes. The ruling treated the specified contributions as rollover contributions, subject to the other requirements of section 402(c).

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the IRS waive the 60-day rollover deadline for two plan distributions after incorrect financial-institution advice?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 402(c)(3)(B), 402(c)(4), 401(a)(9), and 6110; Rev. Proc. 2003-16

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224 201324025

TAX EXEMPT AND MAR 18 2013
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

Uniform Issue List: 402.00-00

SE:T:EP:RA:T1

Legend:

Taxpayer A =
Taxpayer B =
Company C =

Plan D =

Financial Institution E =

Financial Institution F =

Plan G =

Financial Institution H =
Account I =
Account J =
Amount 1 =
Amount 2 =
Amount 3 =

Amount 4 =

Amount 5 =

Amount 6 =

Dear :

This letter is in response to a request for a letter ruling dated October 19, 2012,
as supplemented by correspondence dated December 10, 2012, and January 10,
2013, from your authorized representative, in which you request a waiver of the
60-day rollover requirement contained in section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Internal
Revenue Code ("Code"), regarding the distributions of Amount 1 and Amount 2
from Plan D.

The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of
perjury in support of the ruling requested.

Taxpayer A represents that she received a distribution of Amount 1 from Plan D.
Taxpayer A asserts that her failure to accomplish a rollover of Amount 1 within
the 60-day period prescribed by section 402(c)(3) was due to incorrect advice
provided by Financial Institution H. Taxpayer A further represents that Amount 1
has not been used for any purpose.

Taxpayer B represents that he received a distribution of Amount 2 from Plan D.
Taxpayer B asserts that his failure to accomplish a rollover of Amount 2 within
the 60-day period prescribed by section 402(c)(3) was due to incorrect advice
provided by Financial Institution H. Taxpayer B further represents that Amount 2
has not been used for any purpose.

Taxpayer A operates Company C. Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B are employed by
Company C and participated in its qualified retirement plan, Plan D. The
custodian and administrator of Plan D was Financial Institution E. In September,
2010, Taxpayer A decided to terminate Plan D and adopt a new plan with
Financial Institution F. On September , 20 , Company C adopted Plan G
with Financial Institution F. Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B received distributions
from Plan D net of Federal taxes on October , 20 . Taxpayer A received a
distribution of Amount 3 with Amount 1 withheld for Federal income tax, resulting
in a net distribution of Amount 5. Taxpayer B received a distribution of Amount 4
with Amount 2 withheld for Federal income tax, resulting in a net distribution of
Amount 6. On October , 20 , the checks for Amounts 5 and 6 were
deposited into Account I and Account J, respectively, separate accounts for
Taxpayer A and Taxpayer B within Plan G. Financial Institution H, a
representative of Financial Institution F, was the plan administrator for Plan G.

The Taxpayers intended the transactions to be direct transfers between the two
retirement plans. However, this action was not done and Financial Institution E
withheld federal taxes on the two distributions. When asked by Financial
Institution F to reverse the transaction, Financial Institution E said it had already
sent the withheld taxes to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The Taxpayers
were then advised by a representative of Financial Institution H, they did not
have to deposit the withheld taxes into the Plan until they received the funds
back from IRS as a tax refund. A letter from Financial Institution H,
acknowledging this incorrect advice, was submitted with the ruling request.
On July , 20 , after receiving their 20 refund, the Taxpayers deposited
the taxes withheld (Amount 1 and Amount 2) into the Plan G. The mistake
was discovered in 20 when the Taxpayers received a deficiency notice
from the Service.

Based on the above facts and representations, you request that the Internal
Revenue Service ("Service") waive the 60-day rollover requirement contained in
section 402(c)(3)(A) of the Code with respect to the distributions of Amount 3 and
Amount 4.

Section 402(c) of the Code provides that if any portion of the balance to the credit
of an employee in a qualified trust is paid to the employee in an eligible rollover
distribution, and the distributee transfers any portion of the property received in
such distribution to an eligible retirement plan, and in the case of a distribution of
property other than money, the amount so transferred consists of the property
distributed, then such distribution (to the extent transferred) shall not be
includible in gross income for the taxable year in which paid. Section
402(c)(3)(A) of the Code states that such rollover must be accomplished within
60 days following the day on which the distributee received the property. An
individual retirement account (IRA) constitutes one form of eligible retirement
plan.

Section 402(c)(4) of the Code provides that an eligible rollover distribution shall
not include any distribution to the extent such distribution is required under
section 401(a)(9).

Section 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code provides, in relevant part, that the Secretary
may waive the 60-day requirement under section 402(c) of the Code where the
failure to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience,
including casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the
individual subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after
December 31, 2001, are eligible for the waiver under section 402(c)(3)(B) of the
Code.

Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359 (January 27, 2003) provides that in
determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement
pursuant to sections 408(d)(3)(I) and 402(c)(3)(B) of the Code, the Service will
consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by
a financial institution; (2) inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability,
hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal
error; (3) the use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of payment
by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the
distribution occurred.

The information presented and the documentation submitted by Taxpayer A and
Taxpayer B is consistent with their assertion that their failure to accomplish a
timely rollover of Amount 1 and Amount 2 was due to their reliance on the
incorrect advice by Financial Institution H.

Therefore, pursuant to section 402(c)(3)(B), the Service hereby waives the 60-
day rollover requirement with respect to the distributions of Amount 1 and
Amount 2 from Plan D. Provided all other requirements of section 402(c) of the
Code, except the 60-day requirement, are met with respect to such contributions,
Amount 1 contributed by Taxpayer A to Plan D and Amount 2 contributed by
Taxpayer B to Plan D, on July , 20 , will be considered a rollover contribution
within the meaning of section 402(c) of the Code.

This ruling does not authorize the rollover of amounts that are required to be
distributed by section 401(a)(9) of the Code.

No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described
herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations
which may be applicable thereto.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this letter ruling has been sent to your authorized representative
pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office. If you wish to inquire about
this ruling, please contact ( ), , at ( ).

Sincerely yours,

Carlton A. Watkins
Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1

Enclosures:
Deleted Copy of this Letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose, Notice 437

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.