Advice on signing a consolidated return statute extension

Number
201324015
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Extension by Agreement
Code sections
§ 6229, § 6110
Ruling dated
March 20, 2013
Publicly released
June 13, 2013

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2013
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel Advice addresses who must sign a new Form 872-P in a consolidated-return situation. The memo says that the parent of the tax-matters person does not need to sign the form for the relevant years, based on Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-77(a)(3)(v). It also says a subsidiary partner cannot extend the statute for the parent and other subsidiaries under that provision, and that the IRS typically assesses the parent. The memo recommends confirming the caption for Form 872 so it identifies the parent and subsidiaries as required.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Which parties must sign and how should Form 872-P be captioned for a consolidated group?
  • Outcome: Advice given
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6229; Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-77(a)(3)(v); Form 872-P

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA-320933-13
Office: -------------
UILC: 6229.02-00
Number: 201324015
Release Date: 6/14/2013
From: --------------------
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 9:33 AM
To: ------------------
Cc: -----------------------------------------------
Subject: 872 question

--------- - your advice is correct except that the parent of the TMP need not sign the new Form 872-P. Treas. Reg. 1.1502-77(a)(3)(v), effective for taxable years beginning on or after June 28, 2002 resolved this issue.

But the sub partner cannot extend the statute
for the parent and other subs under this provision and we typically only assess the parent. So we don’t really need the sub to sign the parent extension.

------------------------in ------- can help you with the caption of Form 872. I think it may only need to specify the parent name “and subsidiaries”, but ------- may have a more particularized way of doing this.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace