CCA 201321023: CAPCO must recognize income from tax-credit offsets used for investor payments

Number
201321023
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
General Rule for Taxable Year of Inclusion (Year Received v. Not Year Received); Constructive Receipt; Payments to Third Person; Accrual Method
Code sections
§ 61, § 451, § 446, § 6110(k)(3)
Ruling dated
May 6, 2013
Publicly released
May 24, 2013

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2013
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel Advice addresses a certified capital company, or CAPCO, that uses insurance premium tax-credit offsets to pay interest and principal on notes issued to investors. The advice concludes that using the offsets to pay the CAPCO's obligations creates gross income, even when the offsets are applied instead of cash and the payment is made to a third party on the CAPCO's behalf. Assuming the CAPCO is an accrual-basis taxpayer, it must recognize the income annually in the amount of loan payments made or deemed paid through the offsets during that taxable year. The advice relies on the general gross-income rule and the all-events test.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: When must a CAPCO recognize income from tax-credit offsets used to pay investor note principal and interest?
  • Outcome: Advice given. The CAPCO must recognize income from the offsets and do so annually under the stated accrual-method assumption.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 61, 451, and 446; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.451-1(a) and 1.446-1(c)(1)(ii)(A); Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co., 348 U.S. 426, 431 (1955); Old Colony Trust Co. v. Commissioner, 279 U.S. 716, 729 (1929); Schlude v. Commissioner, 372 U.S. 128, 133 (1963); Rev. Ruls. 84-31 and 80-308; Vasquez v. Commissioner, T.C.M. 1997-78; IRC § 6110(k)(3).

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2013050609123627
Office: -----------------
UILC: 451.00-00, 451.14-00, 451.14-03, 451.19-00
Number: 201321023
Release Date: 5/24/2013
From: ---------------------
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2013 9:12:45 AM
To: ---------------------
Cc: ------------------------
Subject: CAPCO question - draft of our response

Below, please find our response to your inquiry:

1) Does a CAPCO need to recognize income when it applies tax credit offsets as payments of interest and principal on notes issued to its investors? Tax credit offsets is the term taxpayers use for insurance premium tax credits used to pay back their investors in lieu of cash.

Yes, the taxpayer must recognize income from the use of tax credit offsets as payments of interest and principal on notes issued to its investors. Section 61 generally provides that gross income means all income from whatever source derived. The term “income” is broadly defined as “instances of undeniable accessions to wealth, clearly realized, and over which the taxpayers have complete dominion.” Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co., 348 U.S. 426, 431 (1955). The payment of the expenses of a taxpayer by another is includible in the taxpayer’s gross income. Old Colony Trust v. Commissioner, 279 U.S. 716 (1929) (payment of employee’s income taxes by the employer made in consideration of employee’s services constituted additional taxable income of employee). Moreover, the payments are includible in the taxpayer’s gross income regardless of whether they are made directly to the taxpayer or to a third party on the taxpayer’s behalf. See Old Colony at 729, which held it “immaterial that the taxes were paid over directly to the government. The discharge by a third person of an obligation [of the taxpayer] is equivalent to receipt by the [taxpayer].” Vasquez v. Commissioner, T.C.M. 1997-78 (repayment of student loans by employer includable in student’s gross income).

2) When should the CAPCO recognize income from the application of tax credit offsets?

The CAPCO must annually recognize income in the amount of loan payments made, or deemed paid, through the use of the tax credit offsets (a.k.a. premium tax credits) during that taxable year. In responding to your question we assume that the CAPCO is an accrual basis taxpayer.

Section 451 provides the general rule that the amount of any gross income shall be included in the gross income for the taxable year in which received by the taxpayer, unless such amount is to be properly accounted for in a different period. Section 1.451- 1(a) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that gains, profits, and income are to be included in gross income for the taxable year in which they are actually or constructively received by the taxpayer, unless includible for a different year in accordance with the taxpayer’s method of accounting. Under an accrual method of accounting, income is includible in gross income when all the events have occurred which fix the right to receive such income and the amount thereof can be determined with reasonable accuracy (the “all events test”). Section 1.446-1(c)(1)(ii)(A). All the events that fix the right to receive income occur when (1) the required performance takes place, (2) payment is due, or (3) payment is received, whichever happens earliest. See Schlude v. Commissioner, 372 U.S. 128, 133 (1963); Rev. Rul. 84-31, 1984-1 C.B. 127; Rev. Rul. 80-308, 1980-2 C.B. 162. Under these facts, payment has been received.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace