Private Letter Ruling 1320015 Released May 17, 2013 Approved

PLR 1320015: IRS grants more time to elect out of additional depreciation

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2013
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS considered a corporation's request for extra time to elect not to claim 100-percent additional first-year depreciation for certain classes of property. The corporation had filed its tax return without deducting the depreciation, but it had inadvertently failed to attach the required election statement. The IRS concluded that the corporation acted reasonably and in good faith and that relief would not prejudice the government. It granted 60 calendar days from the letter date to make the election by filing an amended federal tax return with the required statement.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the taxpayer receive additional time to elect not to deduct additional first-year depreciation for specified property classes?
  • Outcome: Approved
  • Key authorities: IRC § 168(k); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.168(k)-1 and 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201320015 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 5/17/2013 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.04-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------------------------------ ------------------, ID No. ------------------
------------------------------------ Telephone Number:
-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------
------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:7
PLR-152001-12
Date:
February 14, 2013

Re: Request for Extension of Time to Make the Election Not to Deduct the Additional
First Year Depreciation

Taxpayer = -------------------------------------------------------------
A = ------------------------------------------
B = -----
C = -----
D = -------------------
E = -----------------------------------------
State = --------------
Date1 = --------------------
Date2 = ----------------------
Date3 = ---------------------------
Date4 = -----------------------

Dear -------------:

   This letter responds to a letter dated December 6, 2012, and subsequent

correspondence, submitted by Taxpayer requesting an extension of time pursuant to
§ 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to make the election not
to deduct the 100-percent additional first year depreciation under § 168(k)(5) of the
Internal Revenue Code for 5-year, 7-year, and 15-year classes of qualified property
placed in service in the taxable year ended Date3.

FACTS

     Taxpayer represents that the facts are as follows:

  Taxpayer is a corporation organized under the laws of State and is a taxable

REIT subsidiary of A. Prior to Date1, Taxpayer was a stand-alone corporation.
Beginning Date1, Taxpayer became the parent of a consolidated group with B
subsidiaries. The subsidiaries were liquidated in Date2. Taxpayer presently owns
PLR-152001-12 2

various subsidiaries that are single member limited liability companies (LLCs) and
disregarded entities for federal tax purposes. Taxpayer also owns C controlled foreign
corporations. Taxpayer is engaged in the business of owning and operating assisted
living facilities throughout the D. Taxpayer’s federal tax return for the taxable year
ended Date3 was timely filed in Date4. Taxpayer prepared the return and Taxpayer’s
outside accountant, E, reviewed it.

     On this return, Taxpayer did not deduct the additional first year depreciation for

all eligible classes of qualified property placed in service by Taxpayer in the taxable
year ended Date3. Taxpayer, however, inadvertently failed to attach to the return the
required election statement not to claim the additional first year depreciation deduction
for all eligible classes of qualified property placed in service for the taxable year ended
Date3. Subsequent to filing its federal tax return for the taxable year ended Date3,
Taxpayer discovered that it had failed to attach the election statement to the return for
the taxable year ended Date3 with respect to all eligible classes of qualified property
placed in service in that taxable year. Thereafter, Taxpayer consulted with E for advice
to correct this mistake.

RULING REQUESTED

   Taxpayer requests an extension of time pursuant to § 301.9100-3 of the

Procedure and Administration Regulations to make the election not to deduct the 100-
percent additional first year depreciation under § 168(k)(5) for 5-year, 7-year, and 15-
year classes of qualified property placed in service in the taxable year ended Date3.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

   Section 168(k)(5) provides a 100-percent additional first year depreciation

deduction for the taxable year in which qualified property qualifying for the 100-percent
additional first year depreciation is placed in service by a taxpayer.

    Section 168(k)(2)(D)(iii) provides that a taxpayer may elect not to deduct the

additional first year depreciation for any class of property placed in service during the
taxable year. The term “class of property” is defined in § 1.168(k)-1(e)(2) of the Income
Tax Regulations as meaning, in general, each class of property described in § 168(e)
(for example, 5-year property). See section 3.01 of Rev. Proc. 2011-26, 2011-16 I.R.B.
664 (rules similar to the rules in § 1.168(k)-1 for “qualified property” or for “30-percent
additional first year depreciation deduction” apply for purposes of § 168(k) as currently
in effect).

   Section 1.168(k)-1(e)(1) provides that the election not to deduct additional first

year depreciation for a class of property applies to all qualified property that is in that
class of property and placed in service in the same taxable year. See section 4.01 of
Rev. Proc. 2011-26.
PLR-152001-12 3

   Section 1.168(k)-1(e)(3)(i) provides that the election not to deduct additional first

year depreciation must be made by the due date (including extensions) of the federal
tax return for the taxable year in which the property is placed in service by the taxpayer.

   Section 1.168(k)-1(e)(3)(ii) provides that the election not to deduct additional first

year depreciation must be made in the manner prescribed on Form 4562, “Depreciation
and Amortization,” and its instructions. The instructions to Form 4562 for the taxable
year ended Date1 provided that the election not to deduct the additional first year
depreciation is made by attaching a statement to the taxpayer’s timely filed tax return
indicating that the taxpayer is electing not to deduct the additional first year depreciation
and the class of property for which the taxpayer is making the election.

   Under § 301.9100-1, the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable

extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a
regulatory election.

   Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the

Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an
election. Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain
elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do
not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

    Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be

granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of
relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

CONCLUSIONS

    Based solely on the facts and representations submitted, we conclude that the

requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Accordingly,
Taxpayer is granted 60 calendar days from the date of this letter to make the election
not to deduct the 100-percent additional first year depreciation under § 168(k)(5) for 5-
year, 7-year, and 15-year classes of property placed in service by Taxpayer during the
taxable year ended Date3 that qualify for the additional first year depreciation. This
election must be made by Taxpayer filing an amended federal tax return for that taxable
year, with a statement indicating that Taxpayer is electing not to deduct the additional
first year depreciation for 5-year, 7-year, and 15-year classes of property placed in
service by Taxpayer during that taxable year.

   Except as specifically set forth above, we express no opinion concerning the

federal income tax consequences of the facts described above under any other
provisions of the Code (including other subsections of § 168). Specifically, no opinion is
PLR-152001-12 4

expressed or implied on whether any item of depreciable property placed in service by
Taxpayer during the taxable year ended Date3 is eligible for the additional first year
depreciation deduction.

  In accordance with the power of attorney, we are sending a copy of this letter to

Taxpayer’s authorized representative. We are also sending a copy of this letter to the
appropriate Industry Director, Large Business & International Division (LB&I).

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)

provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

                                             Sincerely,

                                             Willie E. Armstrong, Jr.

                                             Willie E. Armstrong, Jr.
                                             Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 7
                                             Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                             (Income Tax and Accounting)

Enclosures (2):
copy of this letter
copy for section 6110 purposes

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.