Private Letter Ruling 1319035 Released May 10, 2013 Approved Transcribed from scan

PLR 1319035: IRS approves a conditional minimum funding waiver

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2013
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS approved a waiver of a plan's required minimum funding contribution for a specified plan year. The approval was conditional on the sponsor making later contributions, timely quarterly contributions, providing acceptable collateral, and giving proof of payment to the IRS and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. The sponsor had experienced financial hardship after a major customer reduced its business, but the IRS found that the sponsor's financial condition was improving and that projected revenues and cash flows could meet future funding obligations. The waiver becomes retroactively null and void if any condition is not satisfied.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the plan receive a conditional waiver of its minimum funding contribution?
  • Outcome: Approved, subject to stated conditions.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 412(c) and 430(j)(3); ERISA §§ 302(c) and 302(c)(7).

Full text (IRS public release)

201319035

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

FEB 14 2013

Significant Index Number 412.06-00

T.EP.RA.T

Re:

Sponsor:

Plan:

Dear

This letter constitutes notice that a waiver of the required minimum funding contribution
for the Plan for the plan year ending December 31, 20[illegible] has been approved subject to
the conditions listed below. A waiver was previously approved for the plan year ending
December 31, 20[illegible].

  1. The Company makes contributions to the Plan in amounts sufficient to meet the
    minimum funding requirements for the plan years ending December 31, 20[illegible]
    through December 31, 20[illegible], by September 15 of the following years respectively;

  2. Starting with the contribution due on April 15, 20**, the Company makes all
    quarterly contributions to the Plan required under section 430(j)(3) of the Code in a
    timely fashion while the Plan is subject to the waiver of the minimum funding
    standard;

See IRS letter dated September 12, 2011, which was agreed to by the Sponsor in a letter dated
September 15, 2011.

  1. Under section 412(c)(7) of the Code, the Company is restricted from amending the
    Plan to increase benefits or plan liabilities while any portion of the waived funding
    deficiency remains unamortized;

  2. The Company provides collateral acceptable to PBGC for the full amount of the
    Plan Year 20[illegible] waiver within 120 days of the receipt of the IRS ruling letter; and

  3. The Company provides proof of payment of all contributions described above in a
    timely manner to the Internal Revenue Service and to PBGC at the addresses
    noted below:

If any one of these conditions is not satisfied, the waiver is retroactively null and void.

This conditional waiver has been granted in accordance with section 412(c) of the
Internal Revenue Code and section 302(c) of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA").

The Sponsor is a privately owned corporation. It operates three lines of business
administered by distinct operating divisions. The Sponsor incurred a financial hardship
when its largest customer in one of its lines of business substantially reduced the
amount of business it transacted with the Sponsor, leading to a reduction of revenue for
this line of business decreased by ** percent. In response, the Sponsor outsourced
certain operations for this line of business, reorganized other parts of the business, and
took steps to diversify its operations. In addition, the major customer that previously
reduced its activity with the Sponsor is now increasing the amount of business with the
Sponsor. The Sponsor has demonstrated that its financial health is improving and
provided projections that illustrate that its revenues and cash flows will improve
adequately to satisfy the Plan's funding obligations in the future.

Your attention is called to section 412(c) of the Code and section 302(c)(7) of ERISA
which describe the consequences that would result in the event the plan is amended to
increase benefits, change the rate in the accrual of benefits or to change the rate of
vesting, while any portion of the waived funding deficiency remains unamortized.

2

Please note that any amendment to a profit sharing plan or any other retirement plans
(covering employees covered by this plan) maintained by the Sponsor, to increase the
liabilities of those plans would be considered an amendment for purposes of section
412(c) of the Code and section 302(c)(7) of ERISA. Similarly, the establishment of a
new profit sharing plan or any other retirement plan by the Sponsor (covering
employees covered by this plan) would be considered an amendment for purposes of
section 412(c) of the Code and section 302(c)(7) of ERISA.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

When filing Form 5500 for the plan year ending December 31, 20[illegible], the date of this
letter should be entered on Schedule B (Actuarial Information). For this reason, we
suggest that you furnish a copy of this letter to the enrolled actuary who is responsible
for the completion of the Schedule B.

We have sent a copy of this letter to the Manager, EP Classification in , and to the
Manager, EP Compliance Unit in
.

We have sent a copy of this letter to your authorized representative pursuant to a power
of attorney on file in this office.

If you require further assistance in this matter, please contact ***.

Sincerely,

William B. Hulteng, Manager
Employee Plans Technical

cc: Manager, EP Classification

Manager, EP Compliance Unit

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.