How TEFRA partnership items are handled in a Munro computation

Number
201319027
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Tax Treatment Determined At Partnership Level
Code sections
§ 6221
Ruling dated
April 4, 2013
Publicly released
May 10, 2013

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2013
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel Advice explains how to calculate a deficiency in a docketed non-TEFRA proceeding when the taxpayer's return includes TEFRA partnership items. The general method removes reported TEFRA items before calculating modified taxable income, with exceptions for items whose treatment is final or for which no TEFRA proceeding is ongoing. The non-TEFRA adjustments are then added, and the tax difference becomes the deficiency. The memo also explains that the parties may agree to treat partnership items as correctly reported, but a Munro stipulation must allow the Service to assess any remaining non-TEFRA deficiency through a later computational adjustment.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: How should partnership items be treated when calculating a non-TEFRA deficiency under a Munro computation?
  • Outcome: Advice given.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6221; CCDM 35.2.1.1.16(5).

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2013040414572901 Number: 201319027
Release Date: 5/10/2013
UILC: 6221.00-00

From:
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 2:57:29 PM
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: FW: Munro calculation issue coordination

Partnership items are not assumed to be correct under the Munro computation. Instead, they are ignored as follows:

The partnership items are removed from the taxpayer Form 1040 and the deficiency is calculated as follows under CCDM 35.2.1.1.16(5):

Whenever non-TEFRA adjustments are to be made to a petitioner's return that contains TEFRA items and a Munro computation must be made, deficiencies shall be computed as follows:

a. All TEFRA items that have been reported on the petitioner's return shall be removed to determine the modified taxable income.

b. However, if the treatment of any TEFRA item has been finally determined, e.g., by reason of a no change, a settlement or a completed TEFRA proceeding, those TEFRA items whose treatment have been finally determined shall not be removed.

c. Similarly, if there is no ongoing TEFRA proceeding with respect to the TEFRA items at the time that the computation is being made, those TEFRA items shall not be removed.

d. The non-TEFRA adjustments that are contained in the statutory notice (as modified in the court proceeding) will be added. The result will be the modified taxable income as corrected.

e. The tax on the amount in step (a) (the modified taxable income) will be calculated.

f. The tax on the amount in step (d) (the modified taxable income as corrected) will be calculated.

g. The amount in step (e) will be subtracted from the amount in step (f). The difference will be the deficiency.

2

Sometimes for the purpose of a docketed non-TEFRA deficiency proceeding the parties will agree to treat the partnership items as correctly reported. But this requires that a Munro stipulation be signed agreeing that the Service may assess any remaining non- TEFRA deficiency (e.g, the bracket creep that would otherwise apply to the non-TEFRA deficiency under the CCDM Munro comp) as part of our later computational adjustment.

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace