Chief Counsel Advice 1319017 Released May 10, 2013 Advice

CCA 1319017: Unassessed tax bars related underpayment interest

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2013
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel Advice addresses whether the IRS may retain tax payments and assess related underpayment interest when the underlying tax was not timely assessed. The advice says the Service may retain payments made before the assessment statute expired, but may not assess additional interest on a liability that was never assessed. It applies the collection and interest periods in IRC §§ 6502 and 6601(g), and cites Treas. Reg. § 301.6601-1(f)(1).

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the IRS assess and collect underpayment interest when the related tax was never timely assessed?
  • Outcome: Advice given.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 6501, 6502, and 6601; Treas. Reg. § 301.6601-1(f)(1); Rev. Rul. 85-67

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2013041515271440 Number: 201319017
Release Date: 5/10/2013
Office: --------------
UILC: 6501.00-00, 6601.12-00

From: ---------------------
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 3:27:16 PM
To: ------------------------
Cc: -------------------------
Subject: RE: Interest on underpayment for a barred assessment.


We agree with the conclusions in your original memo and in your email below. Although the Service did
not assess the ---------------- for tax year -------, it can retain the tax payments made by the taxpayer prior
to the expiration of the ASED. See Rev. Rul. 85-67, 1985 C.B. 364. However, the Service cannot assess
additional interest on the tax liability that was never actually assessed. Section 6601(g) provides that
interest prescribed under 6601 on any tax may be assessed and collected at any time during the period
within which the tax to which such interest relates may be collected. Under section 6502, where a tax
assessment has been made within the requisite period of limitations, the Service may collect the tax by
levy or by a proceeding in court, but only if the levy is made or the proceeding begun within 10 years after
the assessment of the tax. In this case the Service is barred from assessing the ------- tax and the Service
must also be barred from assessing and collecting the related underpayment interest. See Treas. Reg.
301.6601-1(f)(1) (interest "may be assessed and collected at any time within the period of limitation on
collection after the assessment of the tax to which it relates"). See also Gingerich v. United States, 78
Fed. Cl. 164, 169 n. 4 ("Because the IRS may only collect tax for which a timely assessment is made, see
I.R.C. 6502(a), and interest may only be assessed while the assocaited tax may be collected, see I.R.C.
6601(g), and because the IRS did not timely assess tax here . . ., sections 6502 and 6601 do not provide
the government an avenue by which it could have assessed the related interest in these cases).

Finally, we agree that the counsel memo brought to your attention by the revenue agent is not relevant to
the issue in this case because it involves the reinstatement of a tax liability after an erroneous abatement,
due to a clerical error. No such abatement or clerical error occurred in this case.

If you have questions or would like to discuss, please feel free to contact me.

Thanks,

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.