PLR 1318033: Inherited IRA interests may be divided into four sub-IRAs
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An estate inherited an individual retirement account after the account owner died without naming a beneficiary. The estate administrator planned to divide the account into four equal inherited sub-IRAs for the four beneficiaries. The IRS ruled that each interest could be segregated, each sub-IRA would be an inherited IRA, and required distributions could use the decedent's remaining life expectancy. The trustee-to-trustee transfers would not be treated as taxable distributions or attempted rollovers.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could an inherited IRA be divided into separate sub-IRAs for four non-spouse beneficiaries, with required distributions based on the decedent's remaining life expectancy?
- Outcome: Approved.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 401(a)(9), 408(a)(6), 408(d)(1), and 408(d)(3); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.401(a)(9)-2, 1.401(a)(9)-4, 1.401(a)(9)-5, and 1.401(a)(9)-8; Rev. Rul. 78-406
Full text (IRS public release)
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224 201318033
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION FEB 07 2013
UIL: 401.06-00; 408.06-00
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Legend:
Taxpayer A = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Taxpayer B = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Taxpayer C = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Taxpayer D = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Decedent E = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Administrator F = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
IRA X = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Amount Y = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Amount Z = XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Dear XXXXXXXXX:
This is in response to your request, dated July 14, 2011, as supplemented by
correspondence dated September 13, 2011, December 7, 2011, and January 18, 2013,
submitted on your behalf by your authorized representative, in which you request rulings
under sections 401(a)(9) and 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).
The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in
support of the rulings requested.
Decedent E died testate on November 1, 2010, after having attained her required
beginning date (as defined in section 401(a)(9)(C) of the Code) At the date of her
death, Decedent E was the owner of an individual retirement account, IRA X, which, at
XXXXXXXXXX
Page 2 of 6 201318033
the time of her death, had a value of Amount Z, and which as of December 31, 2012,
had a value of Amount Y. Administrator F was appointed administrator of Decedent E's
estate under applicable State law.
Decedent E did not name a beneficiary of IRA X. Thus, Decedent E's estate is the sole
beneficiary thereof. In accordance with Decedent E's Last Will and Testament,
Administrator F and Taxpayers B, C and D (such individuals hereinafter referred to
individually as Beneficiary, and collectively as Beneficiaries) are entitled to equal one-
fourth shares of IRA X as beneficiaries of Decedent E's estate. None of the
Beneficiaries is a surviving spouse of Decedent E.
Administrator F intends to divide IRA X into four equal shares, one for each of the
Beneficiaries. This will be accomplished by dividing IRA X by means of a series of
trustee-to-trustee transfers into four distinct sub-IRAs, each intended to be established
as an inherited IRA. Each sub-IRA is titled in a manner that indicates it is Decedent E's
IRA for the benefit of (f/b/o) a specified Beneficiary. Each of the sub-IRAs will receive a
pro-rata share of all earnings and interest of IRA X, which is allocated in a reasonable
and consistent manner, and calculated up to the date of the transfer.
Minimum required distributions, within the meaning of section 401(a)(9) of the Code,
have and will continue to be made from IRA X for each year up through the year in
which the trustee-to-trustee transfers are made to the four distinct sub-IRAs.
Thereafter, each of the four sub-IRAs will make distributions intended to meet the
minimum required distribution requirements of section 401(a)(9) of the Code based on
Decedent E's remaining life expectancy.
Based on the above facts and representations, you requested the following rulings:
(1) Each Beneficiary's one-fourth interest in IRA X can be segregated and
held in a separate inherited sub-IRA for purposes of determining the
minimum required distribution under section 401(a)(9) of the Code.
(2) Each of the sub-IRAs created by means of the trustee-to-trustee transfers,
each of which will be titled Decedent E (deceased) IRA f/b/o a specified
Beneficiary, constitutes an inherited IRA under section 408(d)(3) of the
Code.
(3) The minimum required distribution requirement under section 401(a)(9) of
the Code with respect to each distinct sub-IRA may be met by distributing
amounts annually from such sub-IRA calculated using Decedent E's
remaining life expectancy using the age of Decedent E as of her birthday
in the calendar year of her death, reduced by one for each subsequent
calendar year in accordance with section 1.401(a)(9)-5, Q&A-5, of the
Income Tax Regulations (Regulations).
(4) The transfer of each Beneficiary's one-fourth interest in IRA X to the
corresponding sub-IRA in Decedent E's name for the benefit of such
Beneficiary will not constitute a distribution within the meaning of section
408(d)(1) of the Code, nor will it be considered an attempted rollover from
IRA X to the sub-IRA.
Sections 408(a)(6) and 401(a)(9) of the Code, and the regulations promulgated
thereunder, mandate that certain minimum required distributions be made from a
traditional individual retirement account (IRA) if the IRA holder (hereinafter referred to
as a participant) has attained her required beginning date (as defined in section
401(a)(9)(C) of the Code).
Section 401(a)(9)(B)(i) of the Code and section 1.401(a)(9)-2, Q&A-5 of the Regulations
provides that, if a participant dies after distributions under section 401(a)(9) of the Code
have begun, but before the entire benefit has been distributed, then the remaining
portion of the benefit must be distributed to the participant's beneficiary at least as
rapidly as under the method of distribution being used as of the date of the participant's
death.
Section 401(a)(9)(C)(ii) of the Code and section 1.401(a)(9)-2, Q&A-2(b), of the
Regulations, provide that a participant's required beginning date, for purposes of
receiving minimum required distributions under section 401(a)(9), is April 1 of the
calendar year following the calendar in which he or she attains age 70½.
Section 408(d)(1) of the Code generally provides that, in accordance with the rules of
section 72 of the Code, amounts paid or distributed from an IRA are included in the
gross income of the payee or distributee.
Section 408(d)(3)(C) of the Code generally prohibits a tax-free rollover from an inherited
IRA to the IRA of a non-spouse beneficiary. Under section 408(d)(3)(C)(ii) of the Code,
an IRA is treated as inherited if the individual for whose benefit the account is
maintained acquired the account by reason of the death of another individual.
Section 1.401(a)(9)-4, Q&A 1, of the Regulations provides that a designated beneficiary
is an individual who is designated as a beneficiary under the plan. Section 1.401(a)(9)-
4, Q&A-3, of the Regulations clarifies that only individuals may be designated
beneficiaries. According to that Regulation, a person that is not an individual, such as a
participant's estate, may not be a designated beneficiary. Furthermore, section
1.401(a)(9)-4, Q&A-4, of the Regulations states that in order to be a designated
beneficiary, an individual must be a beneficiary as of the date of death.
Section 1.401(a)(9)-5, Q&A-5, of the Regulations states the manner in which minimum
required distributions under section 401(a)(9) of the Code must be calculated if an IRA
participant dies without a designated beneficiary after her required beginning date (as
defined in section 401(a)(9)(C) of the Code). Under section 1.401(a)(9)-5, Q&A-5(a)
and (c), of the Regulations, the applicable distribution period for purposes of calculating
such minimum required distributions for distribution calendar years after the distribution
calendar year containing the participant's death is the participant's remaining life
expectancy using her age as of her birthday in the calendar year of her death. Section
XXXXXXXXXX
Page 4 of 6 201318033
1.401(a)(9)-5, Q&A-5(c), of the Regulations further states that in subsequent calendar
years the applicable distribution period is reduced by one for each calendar year that
has elapsed after the calendar year of the participant's death.
For purposes of applying the minimum required distribution requirements of sections
408(a)(6) and 401(a)(9) of the Code, section 1.401(a)(9)-8, Q&A-2(a)(2), of the
Regulations allows the interests of distinct beneficiaries in the account of a deceased
participant to be divided into separate, segregated accounts. Section 1.401(a)(9)-8,
Q&A-3, of the Regulations provides that, under such circumstances, all post-death
investment gains and losses for the period prior to the establishment of such separate
accounts must be allocated on a pro-rata basis in a reasonable and consistent manner
among the separate accounts.
Revenue Ruling 78-406, 1978-2 C.B. 157, states that the direct transfer of funds from
one IRA trustee to another does not result in a payment or distribution of the funds for
purposes of section 408(d)(1) of the Code. The Revenue Ruling also says this
conclusion applies regardless of whether the bank trustee initiates such a transfer or the
participant directs it. Revenue Ruling 78-406 further provides that a transfer from one
IRA bank trustee to another, even if directed by the participant, is not a rollover
contribution to the recipient IRA for purposes of section 408(d)(3) of the Code because
the funds are not within the direct control and use of the participant.
According to the facts represented herein, each of the sub-IRAs will represent a distinct
beneficiary's interest in IRA X. Administrator F has also represented that all of the
investment gains and losses of IRA X for the period prior to the asset transfers to each
sub-IRA will be allocated on a pro-rata basis among the sub-IRAs in a reasonable and
consistent manner. Accordingly, pursuant to section 1.401(a)(9)-8, Q&A-2(a)(2) and
(3), of the Regulations, each of the sub-IRAs may be considered separately, and need
not be aggregated with the other sub-IRAs, for purposes of applying the minimum
required distribution requirements of sections 408(a)(6) and 401(a)(9) of the Code.
As stated above, pursuant to the facts represented herein, each of the sub-IRAs
represents a distinct Beneficiary's interest in IRA X. Therefore, each of the sub-IRAs is
being maintained for the benefit of one of the Beneficiaries, each of whom acquired
such sub-IRA by reason of the death of Decedent E. Consequently, pursuant to section
408(d)(3)(C)(ii) of the Code, each of the sub-IRAs is an inherited IRA.
Under the facts represented herein, Decedent E did not name a beneficiary of IRA X.
Therefore, pursuant to section 1.401(a)(9)-4, Q&A-1, of the Regulations, the
Beneficiaries are not designated beneficiaries for purposes of section 401(a)(9) of the
Code.
Furthermore, the represented facts reflect that Decedent E died after her required
beginning date (as defined in section 401(a)(9)(C) of the Code). Therefore, pursuant to
section 1.401(a)(9)-5, Q&A-5(a) and (c), of the Regulations, the applicable distribution
period for purposes of calculating minimum required distributions under section
XXXXXXXXXX
Page 5 of 6 201318033
401(a)(9) of the Code for each of the sub-IRAs is measured by Decedent E's remaining
life expectancy using her age as of her birthday in the calendar year of her death. In
subsequent calendar years, as stated in section 1.401(a)(9)-5, Q&A-5(c), of the
Regulations, the applicable distribution period is reduced by one for each calendar year
that has elapsed after the calendar year of Decedent E's death.
The holding of Revenue Ruling 78-406 would apply to the facts represented herein
because each sub-IRA is set up and maintained in the name of Decedent E for the
benefit of a specified Beneficiary. But for the asset transfers to the sub-IRAs, after
Decedent E's death and until such time as distributions would have been made to the
Beneficiaries, IRA X would have been held in Decedent's name for the benefit of the
Beneficiaries. Consequently, the Beneficiaries have no greater direct control or use of
the IRA X funds as a result of the trustee-to-trustee transfers from IRA X to the sub-
IRAs.
Therefore, with respect to the rulings requested, we conclude:
(1) Each Beneficiary's one-fourth interest in IRA X can be segregated and
held in a separate inherited sub-IRA for purposes of determining the
minimum required distribution under section 401(a)(9) of the Code.
(2) Each sub-IRA created by means of the trustee-to-trustee transfer, which
will be titled Decedent E (deceased) IRA f/b/o a specified Beneficiary,
constitutes an inherited IRA under section 408(d)(3) of the Code.
(3) The minimum required distribution requirement under section 401(a)(9) of
the Code with respect to each distinct sub-IRA may be met by distributing
amounts annually from such sub-IRA calculated using Decedent E's
remaining life expectancy as of Decedent E's birthday in the calendar year
of her death, reduced by one for each subsequent calendar year in
accordance with section 1.401(a)(9)-5, Q&A-5, of the Regulations.
(4) The transfer of each Beneficiary's one-fourth interest in IRA X to a sub-
IRA in Decedent's name for the benefit of such Beneficiary will not
constitute a distribution within the meaning of section 408(d)(1) of the
Code, nor will it be considered an attempted rollover from IRA X to the
distinct sub-IRA.
This ruling assumes the above IRAs satisfy the requirements of section 408 of the Code
at all relevant times.
No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein
under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Pursuant to the power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter ruling is
being sent to your authorized representative.
XXXXXXXXXX
Page 6 of 6 201318033
Your ruling request included a user fee of $[illegible] which you paid to our Chief
Counsel's office. The applicable user fee for rulings issued by the Employee Plans
Division is $[illegible]. Accordingly, a refund of $[illegible] will be issued by the Chief
Counsel's office under separate cover.
If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, I.D. #
XXXXXXXX, at (XXX) XXX-XXXX. Please address all correspondence to SE:T:EP:RA:T3.
Sincerely,
Laura B. Warshawsky, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 3
Enclosures:
Deleted copy of ruling letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose
cc:
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.