PLR 1318029: Rollover deadline waived after a custodian opened the wrong account
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An IRA owner intended to move retirement funds into a savings account within his IRA after a certificate of deposit matured. The custodian instead opened a non-IRA savings account, creating an unintended distribution. The taxpayer took required minimum distributions from the account and later discovered the mistake through a Form 1099-R. The IRS waived the 60-day rollover deadline for the remaining amount, excluding the required distributions, if the other rollover requirements were met.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Should the IRS waive the 60-day rollover deadline when a custodian opened a non-IRA account instead of the IRA account the taxpayer intended?
- Outcome: Approved. The deadline was waived for the remaining amount after required distributions.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 72, 408(a)(6), 408(d)(1), and 408(d)(3); Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359
Full text (IRS public release)
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
FEB 08 2013
Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00
LEGEND:
Taxpayer A =
IRA B =
Custodian C =
Account D =
Amount 1 =
Amount 2 =
Amount 3 =
Amount 4 =
Amount 5 =
Dear [illegible]:
This is in response to your letter dated June 12, 2012, submitted on your behalf by your
authorized representative, in which you request a waiver of the 60-day rollover
requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”).
The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalties of perjury
in support of your request:
Taxpayer A represents that he received a distribution from IRA B totaling Amount 1.
Taxpayer A asserts that his failure to accomplish a rollover within the 60-day period
prescribed by section 408(d)(3) of the Code was due to the fact that Custodian C
opened a non-IRA savings account, Account D, rather than an IRA savings account as
Taxpayer A intended. Taxpayer A further represents that, aside from taking required
minimum distributions in Amount 2 and Amount 4, Amount 1 has not been used for any
other purpose.
Taxpayer A maintained IRA B, which was invested in a certificate of deposit (CD) with
Custodian C. On August 8, 2011, the date the CD reached its maturity date, Taxpayer
A went to discuss potential investment alternatives with a Custodian C representative.
That day, after deciding not to renew the CD, Taxpayer A opted to open a savings
account with Custodian C to transfer Amount 1 into it. Based on their conversation,
Taxpayer A believed that the savings account was within IRA B, and he had no intention
of withdrawing all his retirement funds from IRA B. Taxpayer A represents that a
Custodian C representative prepared and filled out the paperwork opening Account D.
Taxpayer A maintains that he signed the forms prepared by the Custodian C
representative with the expectation that Amount 1 would be deposited into a savings
account within IRA B.
Prior to transferring the funds into Account D, Taxpayer A reduced Amount 1 by Amount
2, resulting in Amount 3, which was transferred to Account D. Taxpayer A represents
that he took Amount 2 to satisfy his required minimum distribution (“RMD”) partially for
the year, under section 408(a)(6) of the Code.
Consistent with his understanding that Account D was a savings account within IRA B,
Taxpayer A completed his RMD distributions for 2011, and he took a distribution in
Amount 4 from Account D on December 27, 2011, resulting in a balance of Amount 5 in
Account D.
Taxpayer A discovered, upon receipt of his Form 1099-R for the year 2011, that
Account D was not a savings account within IRA B and that, at the time of the deposit of
Amount 3 into Account D, an unintended distribution of his entire retirement savings had
resulted. Taxpayer A represents that he consistently treated Account D as an IRA, as
evidenced by his withdrawal of the RMD for 2011.
Based on the facts and representations, you request a ruling that the Internal Revenue
Service (Service) waive the 60-day rollover requirement in section 408(d)(3) of the Code
with respect to the distribution of Amount 5 (Amount 1, less the RMD distributions of
Amount 2 and Amount 4) from IRA B.
Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in section
408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in gross income
by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner provided under section
72 of the Code.
Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines and provides the rules applicable to IRA rollovers.
Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) of the Code does not
apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for whose benefit
the IRA is maintained if:
(i) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is
paid into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th
day after the day on which the individual received the payment or
distribution; or
(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is
paid into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of
such individual not later than the 60th day after the date on which the
payment or distribution is received, except that the maximum amount
which may be paid into such plan may not exceed the portion of the
amount received which is includible in gross income (determined
without regard to section 408(d)(3)).
Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not apply to any
amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual from an IRA if at
any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such receipt such individual
received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) from an IRA which was
not includible in gross income because of the application of section 408(d)(3).
Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for partial
rollovers.
Section 408(d)(3)(E) of the Code provides that the rollover provisions of section 408(d)
do not apply to any amount required to be distributed under section 408(a)(6).
Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive the 60-day
requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code where the failure
to waive such requirement would be against equity and good conscience, including
casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual
subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001,
are eligible for the waiver under section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code.
Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359, (January 27, 2003) provides that in determining
whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to section
408(d)(3)(I), the Service will consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including: (1)
errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to complete a rollover due to
death, disability, or hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign
country or postal error; (3) the use of amount distributed (for example, in the case of
payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the
distribution occurred.
The information and documentation submitted by Taxpayer A is consistent with his
assertion that his failure to accomplish a timely rollover of Amount 5 was caused by
Custodian C opening a non-IRA savings account, Account D, rather than a savings
account within IRA B as Taxpayer A intended.
Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service hereby waives the
60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount 5 (Amount 1, less
the RMD distributions of Amount 2 and Amount 4) from IRA B. Provided all other
requirements of Code section 408(d)(3), except the 60-day requirement, are met with
respect to the contribution of an amount not to exceed Amount 5, such contribution will
be considered a valid rollover contribution within the meaning of section 408(d)(3) of the
Code.
This ruling does not authorize the rollover of amounts that are required to be distributed
by section 408(a)(6) of the Code.
No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein
under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations, which may
be applicable thereto.
This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
A copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative in accordance with a
Power of Attorney (Form 2848) on file with this office.
If you have any questions, please contact [illegible] (I.D. # [illegible]) by
phone at [illegible] or fax at [illegible]. Please address all correspondence to
SE:T:EP:RA:T1.
Sincerely yours,
Carlton A. Watkins, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1
Enclosures:
Deleted Copy of Ruling Letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.