PLR 1316024: IRS declines to waive rollover deadline after escrow use
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An individual withdrew funds from an IRA and placed them in a non-IRA escrow account to help a daughter qualify to purchase a foreclosed home. The taxpayer intended to return the funds to an IRA after the purchase, but the money was not returned until after the 60-day rollover period. The IRS characterized the transaction as a short-term loan and declined to waive the deadline because the taxpayer assumed the risk that the funds might not be returned in time. The later IRA contribution was therefore not treated as a valid rollover.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Whether the IRS should waive the 60-day rollover requirement after an IRA distribution was used as escrow for a home purchase.
- Outcome: Denied.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 408(d)(3), 408(d)(3)(I), and 72; Rev. Proc. 2003-16.
Full text (IRS public release)
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
201316024
TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
JAN 24 2013
T.E.P. R.A.: T1
Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Legend:
Taxpayer A = XXXXXXXXXXXXX
IRA B = XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Bank C = XXXXXXKXXKXXKK
IRA D = XXXXXXXXXKXXKXK
Bank E = XXXXXXXXXXKKX
Amount 1 = XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Amount 2 = XXXXXXXXXXXXX
Dear XXXXXXXXXXXKXX:
This is in response to your request dated February 14, 2012, in which you request a
waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code (the “Code”).
The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of perjury in
support of the ruling requested:
Taxpayer A represents that he received a distribution from IRA B totaling Amount 1.
Taxpayer A asserts that his failure to accomplish a rollover of Amount 1 within the 60-
day period prescribed by section 408(d)(3) was due to his temporary use of the funds as
escrow for the purchase of a home for his daughter and the delay in the return of the
funds from this account.
2 201316024
Taxpayer A maintained IRA B with Bank C. In April [illegible], Taxpayer A’s daughter was
attempting to purchase a home that was in foreclosure. Part of the qualification to buy
the home was having a substantial amount of funds on deposit. At about this time,
Taxpayer A had 3 certificates of deposit, totaling Amount 1, in IRA B that were maturing.
Taxpayer A received a distribution totaling Amount 1 from IRA B and deposited Amount
2 in a non-IRA escrow account with Bank E. Taxpayer A intended to rollover Amount 1
upon the completed purchase of the home by his daughter. Because of the nature of the
sale, the funds were not returned to Taxpayer A until July [illegible], 20[illegible], after the
expiration of the 60-day period. Despite being after the 60-day period, Taxpayer A was
able to deposit Amount 1 in IRA D with Bank E. In June 20[illegible], Taxpayer A received a
deficiency notice from the Service on the 20[illegible] distribution from IRA B.
Based on the facts and representations, you request a ruling that the Internal Revenue
Service waive the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount
1 from IRA B.
Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in section
408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in gross income
by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner provided under section
72 of the Code.
Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines and provides the rules applicable to IRA rollovers.
Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) of the Code does not
apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual for whose benefit
the IRA is maintained if:
(i) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid
into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th day after the day on
which the individual receives the payment or distribution; or
(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is paid into an
eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of such individual not later than
the 60th day after the date on which the payment or distribution is received, except that
the maximum amount which may be paid into such plan may not exceed the portion of the
amount received which is includible in gross income (determined without regard to section
408(d)(3)).
Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not apply
to any amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual from
an IRA if at any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such receipt such
individual received any other amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) from an IRA
which was not includible in gross income because of the application of section
408(d)(3).
Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for partial
rollovers.
Section 408(d)(3)(E) of the Code provides that the rollover provisions of section
408(d) do not apply to any amount required to be distributed under section 408(a)(6).
Section 408(d)(3)(C) of the Code provides, in summary, that the rollover rules of Code
section 408(d)(3) do not apply to inherited IRAs.
Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive the 60-day
requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code where the failure
to waive such requirement would be against equity or good conscience, including
casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable control of the individual
subject to such requirement. Only distributions that occurred after December 31, 2001,
are eligible for the waiver under section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code.
Revenue Procedure 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359 (January 27, 2003) provides that in
determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement pursuant to
section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service will consider all relevant facts and
circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2) inability to
complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization, incarceration, restrictions
imposed by a foreign country or postal error; (3) the use of the amount distributed (for
example, in the case of payment by check, whether the check was cashed); and (4) the
time elapsed since the distribution occurred.
Taxpayer A has not presented any evidence to the Service as to how any of the factors
outlined in Rev. Proc. 2003-16 affected his ability to timely roll over the distribution of
Amount 1 from IRA B, or any portion thereof, to an IRA. Taxpayer A has stated that the
Amount 1 distribution from IRA B was used as escrow for the purchase of a home for
his daughter and could not be returned to IRA B within 60 days because the purchase
of the house took longer than the 60-day rollover period causing the failure of Taxpayer
A to complete a rollover. In essence, Taxpayer A made a short term loan when he
withdrew Amount 1 from IRA B and while he had the intent at the time of withdrawal to
redeposit Amount 1 into an IRA prior to the expiration of the 60-day rollover period, he
assumed the risk that Amount 1 might not be returned to him timely. Therefore,
pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Internal Revenue Service hereby
declines to waive the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the April, 2009,
distribution to Taxpayer A of Amount 1.
Thus, the contribution of Amount 1, which Taxpayer A deposited back into an IRA after
the expiration of the 60-day period, will not be considered a valid rollover because the
60-day requirement under section 408(d)(3) of the Code with respect to such
contribution was not satisfied.
No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described herein
under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations which may be
applicable thereto.
This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
4 201316024
If you wish to inquire about this ruling, please contact (Identification
No. XXXXXXX) at (XXX) XXX-XXXX. Please address all correspondence to
SE:T:EP:RA:T1.
Sincerely,
Carlton A. Watkins, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 1
Enclosures:
Deleted copy of ruling letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.