Advice on levying military retirement benefits

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel's office gave informal advice about whether federal tax levies may reach military retirement benefits. The advice states that property and property rights generally may be levied unless specifically exempted by IRC § 6334, and that military retirement pay is not generally exempt under the listed retirement-annuity exception. It also describes the two defenses available to a third party that refuses to surrender property after a levy. The advice further concludes that a cited federal regulation about legal process for retired military members does not appear to exclude federal tax levies.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: Whether federal tax levies may reach military retirement benefits.
• Outcome: Advice given.
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 6331, 6331(h), 6332(a), 6332(e), and 6334; Treas. Reg. § 301.6334-1(c); 5 C.F.R. §§ 582.101 and 582.102.

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2013040910004347 Number: 201316019
Release Date: 4/19/2013
Office: --------------
UILC: 6331.00-00, 6334.00-00

From: ----------------------
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 10:01:00 AM
To: --------------------
Cc: --------------------------
Subject: FW: Military retirement

Hi --------------my reviewer concurs in my response below. Let me know if you want to discuss:

            ---------for review:

            This is an informal at this point. I am unaware of anything unusual about levying on
            military retirement benefits or any other case where we have had problems. As noted
            below, there are IRM procedures which address military retirement levies.

            Here is the general summation of why these benefits would be subject to levy under the
            IRC:

            All property and rights to property belonging to the taxpayer, as well as
            any property or rights to property to which the general and estate tax liens
            attach, may be levied upon except that property which is specifically
            enumerated in section 6334. Note that the exemptions from levy under
            section 6334 do not apply to the section 6331(h) levy. State laws or
            federal laws limiting the amount that may be seized are ineffective against
            the federal levy. Treas. Reg. ' 301.6334-1(c). The property subject to
            levy may be real or personal, tangible or intangible, and may be levied
            upon in any sequence. The Service may levy on Social Security
            retirement benefits. See Acevedo v. United States, 2008-1 U.S.T.C. ¶ 50,
            355 (E.D. Mo. 2008); Leining v. United States, 97-1 U.S.T.C. ¶ 50, 254 (D.
            Conn. 1996); I.R.C. § 6334(c).

            Section 6334(c) provides that, notwithstanding any other law of the U.S., no
            property/rights to property are exempt from levy other than property specifically exempted
            under section 6334(a). There are no exemptions udner section 6334(a) for retirement
            benefits. I found a couple of cases which provide that miliary pensions are not exempt
            from levy. See Melechinsky, 83-1 USTC 9373, Bushong, 91-2 USTC 50,411.

            The exemption to levy found under section 6334(a)(6), specifically "annuities based on
            retired or retainer pay under chapter 73 of title 10 of the United States Code" is not a
            reference to military retirement pay in general, which is clear when you see what the
            annuity is as defined under 10 USC 1434. Accordingly, that section does not exempt
            military retirement pay.

2
The law is also clear that in response to levy, there are only 2 valid defenses:

          The Supreme Court recognized in United States v. National Bank of
          Commerce, 472 U.S. 713, 721-22 (1985), that there are only two valid
          defenses to a third party's refusal to surrender property upon demand.

                  a) The party is not in possession of nor obligated with respect to
                  property or rights to property of the taxpayer; or

                  b) At the time of service of Notice of Levy, the property or rights to
                  property were subject to attachment or execution under judicial
                  process. I.R.C. § 6332(a).

          Finally, under section 6332(e), the levied party is not liable to the taxpayer in connection
          with compliance with the levy.

          At any rate, the 5 CFR provision they cite as authority does not seem to be directly
          applicable. Section 582.101 subjects salary to "legal process". Section 102(2) exempts
          retired military from this. But under 102(3), federal tax levies do not appear within the
          scope of the "legal process" they describe--mentions tax levies from a state or local
          (not federal) government, court garnishment orders, etc. In other words, a federal tax
          levy does not appear to be the type of "legal process" this provision exempts retired
          military members from.

          The attached OLC opinion which holds that TSP accounts are not exempt from levy may
          also be useful reading.

          Let me know if you would like to discuss. I told ------------ that, since this is just an
          informal, we should be able to get back to him by next week.

Attachment: Applicability of Tax Levies under 26 U.S.C. § 6334 to Thrift Savings Plan
Accounts, 2010 WL 2516025 (O.L.C.) (May 3, 2010)