PLR 1315013: Estate receives 120 more days to make the section 1022 election
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The IRS granted an estate an additional 120 days to file Form 8939, make the section 1022 election, and allocate basis increases to eligible property acquired from a decedent who died in 2010. The estate administrator had retained a tax professional, but the filing requirement was not completed on time. The Service concluded that the requirements for relief under the cited procedure were satisfied. The ruling required a copy to be attached to Form 8939.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: What did the IRS decide under the facts presented?
- Outcome: Approved, on the stated facts and representations.
- Key authorities: IRC § 1022; IRC § 9100; IRC § 6110.
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Third Party Communication: None
Number: 201315013 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Release Date: 4/12/2013 Person To Contact:
-------------------------------, ID No. ------------
Index Number: 1022.00-00, 9100.00-00 -----------------
Telephone Number:
-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------
----------------------------- Refer Reply To:
-------------------------------- CC:PSI:B04
In Re: ---------------------------------- PLR-145533-12
Date: December 19, 2012
Legend:
Decedent = -----------------------------------------------
Court = --------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear ---------------------:
This letter responds to your personal representative’s letter of October 1, 2012,
requesting an extension of time pursuant to § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and
Administration Regulations to file a Form 8939 (Allocation of Increase in Basis for
Property Acquired from a Decedent) to make the Section 1022 Election and to allocate
basis provided by section 1022 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) to eligible property
transferred as a result of Decedent’s death.
The facts and representations submitted are as follows. Decedent died in 2010.
The administrator for Decedent’s estate retained a tax professional to advise him on
estate tax matters including the necessity to file a Form 8939. The administrator of
Decedent’s estate is requesting an extension of time pursuant to § 301.9100-3 to file the
Form 8939 to make the Section 1022 Election and to allocate basis provided by
section 1022 to eligible property transferred as a result of Decedent’s death.
Law and Analysis:
Section 1022(a) provides that property acquired from a decedent who died after
December 31, 2009, is treated as transferred by gift, and the basis of the person
acquiring the property from such a decedent is the lesser of the adjusted basis of the
decedent or the fair market value of the property at the date of the decedent's death.
Section 1022(b)(1) provides, in general, that the basis of property under
section 1022(a) is increased by basis increase that is allocated to the property.
Section 1022(b)(2)(A) provides, in general, that basis increase is the portion of
the aggregate basis increase that is allocated to the property.
PLR-145533-12 2
Section 1022(b)(2)(B) and (C) provide that the aggregate basis increase is
$1,300,000; and that the aggregate basis increase is increased by--(i) the sum of the
amount of any capital loss carryover under section 1212(b), and the amount of any net
operating loss carryover under section 172 that would (but for the decedent's death) be
carried from the decedent's last taxable year to a later taxable year of the decedent,
plus (ii) the sum of the amount of any losses that would have been allowable under
section 165 if the property acquired from the decedent had been sold at fair market
value immediately before the decedent's death.
Section 1022(c)(1) provides that in the case of property that is qualified spousal
property, the basis of such property under section 1022(a) (as increased under
section 1022(b)) is increased by spousal property basis increase allocated to the
property.
Section 1022(c)(2)(A) provides, in general, that spousal property basis increase
is the portion of the aggregate spousal property basis increase which is allocated to the
property. Section 1022(c)(2)(B) provides that the aggregate spousal property basis
increase is $3,000,000.
Section 1022(d)(1)(A) provides, in general, that the basis of property acquired
from a decedent may be increased under section 1022(b) or (c) only if the property was
owned by the decedent at the time of death. Section 1022(d)(1)(B) describes property
that is considered to be owned by the decedent at the time of death.
Section 1022(d)(2) provides that the basis adjustments under sections 1022(b)
and (c) shall not increase the basis of any interest in property above its fair market value
in the hands of the decedent as of the date of the decedent's death.
Section 1022(d)(3) provides, in general, that the executor is to allocate the basis
adjustments under sections 1022(b) and (c) on the return required by section 6018 and
that any allocation made may be changed only as provided by the Secretary.
Section 1022(e) describes property that is considered to be acquired from the
decedent for purposes of section 1022.
Subtitle A of title V of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of
2001, P.L. 107-16 (115 Stat. 76-81), enacted section 2210, which made chapter 11 (the
estate tax) inapplicable to the estate of any decedent who died in 2010 and chapter 13
(the generation skipping transfer (GST) tax) inapplicable to generation-skipping
transfers made in 2010. On December 17, 2010, Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance
Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 (TRUIRJCA), P.L. 111-312 (124 Stat.
3296), became law, and section 301(a) of TRUIRJCA retroactively reinstated the estate
and GST taxes. However, section 301(c) of TRUIRJCA allows the executor of the
PLR-145533-12 3
estate of a decedent who died in 2010 to elect to apply the Code as though
section 301(a) of TRUIRJCA did not apply with respect to chapter 11 and for property
acquired or passing from a decedent (within the meaning of section 1014(b)). Thus,
section 301(c) of TRUIRJCA allows the executor of the estate of a decedent who died in
2010 to elect not to have the provisions of chapter 11 apply to the decedent’s estate,
but rather, to have the provisions of section 1022 apply (the Section 1022 Election).
Notice 2011-66, 2011-35 I.R.B. 184, section I.A. provides that the executor of the
estate of a decedent who died in 2010 makes the Section 1022 Election by filing a Form
8939 on or before November 15, 2011. Notice 2011-76, 2011-40 I.R.B. 479, extended
the due date of the Form 8939 and thus, the election from November 15, 2011 to
January 17, 2012.
Notice 2011-66, section I.D.1, provides that the Internal Revenue Service will not
grant extensions of time to file a Form 8939 and will not accept a Form 8939 filed after
the due date except in four limited circumstances provided in section I.D.2. Under this
section of Notice 2011-66, an executor may apply for relief under § 301.9100-3.
Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that
the requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Therefore, the administrator of
Decedent’s estate is granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter
to make the Section 1022 Election on a Form 8939 and allocate additional basis to
eligible property as provided by section 1022. A copy of this letter should be attached to
the Form 8939.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied
concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-145533-12 4
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and
representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.
Sincerely,
James F. Hogan
James F. Hogan
Chief, Branch 4
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Enclosures:
Copy for section 6110 purposes
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.