Private Letter Ruling 1315012 Released April 12, 2013 Approved

PLR 1315012: S corporation election remains effective after an inadvertent termination

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2013
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS granted relief to a corporation whose S corporation election terminated when a trust became a shareholder without making the required qualified subchapter S trust election. The trust had been an eligible shareholder during the prior period, and the corporation represented that the termination was inadvertent and was not motivated by tax avoidance. The IRS allowed the corporation to continue being treated as an S corporation, provided that the trust and beneficiary filed amended returns and the trust made the required election within 90 days. Failure to satisfy any condition would make the ruling null and void.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the corporation's S corporation status be restored after an inadvertent termination caused by a trust's failure to make a QSST election?
  • Outcome: Approved, subject to the stated filing and election conditions.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361 and 1362(f); Treas. Reg. § 1.1361-1(j); IRC § 6110(k)(3).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201315012 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/12/2013 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.04-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------------- -------------------, ID No. ------------------
---------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------- ----------------------
------------------------------------ Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B02
PLR-144685-12
Date:
January 02, 2013

X = -----------------------------

Y = --------------------------
-------------------------

Trust = --------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------

Beneficiary = ---------------------
-------------------------

State = --------------

D1 = ---------------------

D2 = ---------------------

D3 = -----------------

D4 = ----------------------

D5 = ----------------------

Tax Years = ------------------------

Dear -----------------:
PLR-144685-12 2

This responds to a letter dated September 11, 2012, and subsequent correspondence,
submitted on behalf of X by X’s authorized representative, requesting inadvertent
termination relief pursuant to § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The information submitted states that X was incorporated under the laws of State on D1. X represents that it timely filed an S corporation election with an effective date of D2.

Y, one of X’s shareholders, died on D3. On D4, following the administration of Y’s estate, Y’s estate distributed its shares of X to Trust. During the two years between D4 and D5, Trust was an eligible shareholder by reason of § 1361(c)(2)(A)(iii).

X represents that Trust was a qualified subchapter S trust (QSST) eligible to make an election under § 1361(d)(2) effective D5. However, no such election was filed on behalf of Trust. Therefore, the Trust was not a permissible shareholder, and X’s S corporation election terminated on D5.

X represents that the termination was not motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. X further represents that from D5, X and its shareholders have filed all returns consistent with X's status as an S corporation. X and its shareholders have agreed to make any adjustments that the Commissioner may require, consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation.

Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any corporation (A)
was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined without regard to
§ 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of § 1361(b) or to obtain
shareholder consents, or (B) was terminated under paragraph (2) or (3) of § 1362(d); (2)
the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness or
termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after
discovery of the event resulting in the ineffectiveness, steps were taken (A) so that the
corporation is a small business corporation, or (B) to acquire the required shareholder
consents, and (4) the corporation, and each person who was a shareholder of the
corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make
such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation)
as may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding
the circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness, the corporation shall be treated as
an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.

Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that
the termination of X's S corporation on D5 was inadvertent within the meaning of
§ 1362(f). We further conclude hold that, pursuant to the provisions of § 1362(f), X
will be treated as an S corporation from D5 and thereafter provided that, within 90 days of
PLR-144685-12 3

the date of this letter, the (i) Trust files amended income tax returns for Tax Years consistent with the Trust’s QSST election, (ii) Beneficiary files amended income tax returns for Tax Years consistent with the income beneficiary’s treatment as a QSST beneficiary described in § 1.1361-1(j)(7), and (iii) Trust files a QSST election effective D5, pursuant to the procedures set forth in § 1.1361-1(j)(6), with the appropriate service center. A copy of this letter should be attached to the QSST election and each amended return described above. Failure to comply with any of the three conditions described above shall render this ruling null and void.

Except for the specific ruling above, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts of this case under any other provision of the Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed or implied regarding X's eligibility to be an S corporation or Trust’s eligibility to be a QSST.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being forwarded to X’s authorized representatives.

                                    Sincerely,




                                    Melissa C. Liquerman
                                    Branch Chief, Branch 2
                                    (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy for section 6110 purposes

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.