PLR 1314051: IRS waives an IRA rollover deadline after a custodian misclassified an investment
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An individual directed an IRA custodian to make a private-placement investment for the IRA. The custodian approved the investment process, but later treated the investment as a taxable distribution and issued Form 1099-R. The individual transferred the investment to another firm, which agreed that it was a permissible IRA investment and became its custodian. The IRS waived the 60-day rollover requirement under IRC § 408(d)(3)(I), provided the other rollover requirements were satisfied. The ruling did not authorize a rollover of amounts required to be distributed under IRC § 401(a)(9).
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the IRS waive the 60-day IRA rollover requirement after a custodian misclassified an IRA investment as a distribution?
- Outcome: approved
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 72, 401(a)(9), 408(d)(1), 408(d)(3), and 6110(k)(3); Rev. Proc. 2003-16
Full text (IRS public release)
TAX EXEMPT
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 201314051
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224
AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION
Uniform Issue List: 408.03-00 JAN 10 2013
T:EP:RA:T3
Legend:
Taxpayer A:
Financial Institution C:
Financial Services Firm D:
Financial Advisor T:
Holding B Investment:
IRA Y:
Amount L:
Dear
This is in response to your letter dated May 25, 2012, in which you request a
waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement contained in section 408(d)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code (Code).
The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalty of
perjury in support of the ruling requested.
Taxpayer A represents that she received a distribution of Amount L from IRA Y.
Taxpayer A asserts that her failure to accomplish a timely rollover of Amount L
was due to errors on the part of Financial Institution C which caused the Holding
B Investment purchased by Financial Institution C to be treated as a distribution
by Financial Institution C. Taxpayer A represents that Amount L has not been
used for any other purpose.
Taxpayer A owned IRA Y, which was maintained by Financial Institution C.
201314051
In early April 20 , Taxpayer A contacted her financial advisor, Financial Advisor
T, regarding an opportunity Taxpayer A had to invest in a private placement
investment with the Holding B Investment. Taxpayer A disclosed the details of the
proposed Holding B Investment to Financial Advisor T and asked if Taxpayer
A’s IRA, held with Financial Institution C, could make a direct investment in the
Holding B Investment.
Page 2
Financial Advisor T informed Taxpayer A that it had communicated with Financial
Institution C and that the Holding B investment would be a permissible direct
investment by IRA Y. Financial Advisor T, with the advice of Financial Institution
C, prepared a letter with wire instructions (Wire Letter) addressed to Financial
Institution C that explicitly stated that the purchase under consideration was to be
coded as a “purchase and securities will be delivered back” to IRA Y. This Wire
Letter was transmitted by Financial Advisor T to Taxpayer A for signature.
Taxpayer A signed and returned the Wire Letter to Financial Advisor T.
At all times Financial Advisor T confirmed that the Holding B Investment was
acceptable to Financial Institution C for investment in IRA Y. All communications
between Taxpayer A and Financial Institution C are handled by Financial Advisor
T. Financial Advisor T represented in writing that Financial Institution C approved
of the investment by IRA Y in the Holding B Investment.
Taxpayer A represents that on April , 20 she requested Financial Institution
C to invest Amount L of IRA Y in a private placement investment with the Holding
B Investment. The Holding B Investment by IRA Y was made on April , 20 ,
when funds were wired from Financial Institution C to the Holding B Investment.
No funds from IRA Y were ever distributed to Taxpayer A. Upon receipt of the
wire transfer, the Holding B Investment reflected the investment as being owned
by IRA Y. Taxpayer A was told by Financial Advisor T that this transaction was
complete and that an interest in the Holding B Investment was owned by IRA Y.
In the spring of 20, Taxpayer A received a Schedule K-1 from Holding B
reflecting the income tax results for the tax year 2011. IRA Y was reflected as the
partner’s name on the Holding B Schedule K-1. Also, in the spring of 2012,
Taxpayer A received a 1099-R from Financial Institution C which showed a
distribution of Amount L from IRA Y. Taxpayer A contacted Financial Advisor T
regarding the issuance of the 1099-R. Financial Advisor T initially indicated there
was a mistake. Taxpayer A eventually learned that Financial Institution C was
treating the Holding B Investment as a taxable distribution from IRA Y into an
investment not owned by IRA Y. In a telephone conference with the Financial
Institution C Client Advocacy Team, Financial Institution C told Taxpayer A that it
was not willing to recognize the Holding B Investment as a qualified IRA
investment under the Financial Institution C guidelines.
On April , 20 , Taxpayer A transferred the Holding B Investment to Financial
Services Firm D which reviewed all information and concluded the Holding B
Page 3 201314051
Investment was a permissible IRA investment, and Financial Services Firm D
was willing to serve as the qualified IRA Custodian of IRA Y. On April , 20 ,
the Holding B Investment office issued an acknowledgement that Financial
Services Firm D is custodian of the Holding B Investment.
Based on the facts and representations, you request a ruling that the Internal
Revenue Service (Service) waive the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to
the distribution of Amount L from IRA Y.
Section 408(d)(1) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided in
section 408(d), any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA shall be included in
gross income by the payee or distributee, as the case may be, in the manner
provided under section 72 of the Code.
Section 408(d)(3) of the Code defines, and provides the rules applicable to IRA
rollovers.
Section 408(d)(3)(A) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(1) of the Code
does not apply to any amount paid or distributed out of an IRA to the individual
for whose benefit the IRA is maintained if --
(i) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is
paid into an IRA for the benefit of such individual not later than the 60th
day after the day on which the individual receives the payment or
distribution; or
(ii) the entire amount received (including money and any other property) is
paid into an eligible retirement plan (other than an IRA) for the benefit of
such individual not later than the 60th day after the date on which the
payment or distribution is received, except that the maximum amount
which may be paid into such plan may not exceed the portion of the
amount received which is includible in gross income (determined without
regard to section 408(d)(3)).
Section 408(d)(3)(B) of the Code provides that section 408(d)(3) does not
apply to any amount described in section 408(d)(3)(A)(i) received by an individual
from an IRA if at any time during the 1-year period ending on the day of such
receipt such individual received any other amount described in section
408(d)(3)(A)(i) from an IRA which was not includible in gross income because of
the application of section 408(d)(3).
Section 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code provides a similar 60-day rollover period for
partial rollovers.
Page 4
201314051
Section 408(d)(3)(E) of the Code provides that the rollover provisions of section
408(d) do not apply to any amount required to be distributed under section
408(a)(6).
Section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code provides that the Secretary may waive the 60-
day requirement under sections 408(d)(3)(A) and 408(d)(3)(D) of the Code where
the failure to waive such requirement would be against equity and good
conscience, including casualty, disaster, or other events beyond the reasonable
control of the individual subject to such requirement. Only distributions that
occurred after December 31, 2001, are eligible for the waiver under section
408(d)(3)(I) of the Code.
Rev. Proc. 2003-16, 2003-4 I.R.B. 359 (January 27, 2003) provides that in
determining whether to grant a waiver of the 60-day rollover requirement
pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I), the Service will consider all relevant facts and
circumstances, including: (1) errors committed by a financial institution; (2)
inability to complete a rollover due to death, disability, hospitalization,
incarceration, restrictions imposed by a foreign country or postal error, (3) the
use of the amount distributed (for example, in the case of payment by check,
whether the check was cashed); and (4) the time elapsed since the distribution
occurred.
The information presented and documentation submitted by Taxpayer A is
consistent with her assertion that her failure to accomplish a timely rollover of
Amount L was due to errors on the part of Financial Institution C which caused
the Holding B Investment purchased by Financial Institution C to be treated as a
distribution by Financial Institution C.
Therefore, pursuant to section 408(d)(3)(I) of the Code, the Service hereby
waives the 60-day rollover requirement with respect to the distribution of Amount
L from IRA Y. Provided all other requirements of section 408(d)(3) of the Code,
except the 60-day requirement, were met with respect to the establishment of
Financial Services Firm D as custodian of the Holding B Investment, such
transaction will be treated as a valid rollover contribution within the meaning of
section 408(d)(3) of the Code.
This ruling does not authorize the rollover of amounts that are required to be
distributed by section 401(a)(9) of the Code.
No opinion is expressed as to the tax treatment of the transaction described
herein under the provisions of any other section of either the Code or regulations,
which may be applicable thereto.
This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of
the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Page 5
201314051
If you have any questions, please contact
SE:T:EP:RA:T3,
Sincerely yours,
Laura B. Warshawsky, Manager
Employee Plans Technical Group 3
|
Enclosures: |
Deleted Copy of Ruling Letter
Notice of Intention to Disclose
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.