Private Letter Ruling 1314026 Released April 5, 2013 Approved

PLR 1314026: IRS permits a retroactive QEF election for a PFIC investment

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2013
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A U.S. resident owned shares in a foreign corporation that was a passive foreign investment company. The shareholder did not know the corporation was a PFIC and did not make a timely qualified electing fund election. After an investment adviser identified the issue, the shareholder submitted affidavits describing the events and the roles of the tax professionals involved. The IRS consented to a retroactive QEF election for the specified year, provided the shareholder follows the timing and filing rules in Treas. Reg. § 1.1295-3(g).

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the shareholder make a retroactive QEF election for the PFIC investment?
  • Outcome: Approved, subject to Treas. Reg. § 1.1295-3(g).
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1295; Treas. Reg. § 1.1295-3(f) and (g).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201314026 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/5/2013 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1295.02-02
Person To Contact:
----------------------------- -------------------------, ID No. -----------------
------------------------ -----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
----------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:B02
PLR-138560-12
Date:
January 07, 2013

              TY: -------

Legend

Shareholder = -----------------------------
SSN = -------------------

FC = --------------------------------------------

Investment Advisor = --------------------------------

Accounting Firm = --------------------------------

Country 1 = ------------
Country 2 = -----------------

Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Year 3 = -------

Date 1 = ------------------------
Date 2 = --------------------------
Date 3 = ------------------------
Date 4 = ------------------------
Date 5 = --------------------------
Date 6 = ---------------------------

Dear -----------------------:
PLR-138560-12 2

This is in response to a letter dated September 1, 2012 submitted by your authorized
representative that requested the consent of the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue
Service (“Commissioner”) for Shareholder to make a retroactive qualified electing fund
(“QEF”) election under section 1295(b) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and
Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f) with respect to Shareholder’s investment in FC.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted on behalf of Shareholder by its authorized representative, and accompanied
by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office
has not verified any of the material submitted in support of this request for ruling, such
material is subject to verification on examination. The information submitted in the
request is substantially as set forth below.

FACTS

Shareholder is an individual and at all relevant times a United States resident for U.S.
federal income tax purposes. During Year 1, Shareholder acquired shares of FC, an
entity organized under the laws of Country 1 that was treated as a corporation for U.S.
federal income tax purposes. At all relevant times, FC was a passive foreign
investment company (“PFIC”) as defined in section 1297(a) of the Code.

Also at all relevant times, Shareholder’s investments, including its investment in FC,
were handled by Investment Advisor. Investment Advisor received all statements and
tax documents from FC on behalf of Shareholder. During Year 2, Shareholder retained
Accounting Firm to prepare its Year 1 tax return. On Date 3, Shareholder filed its Year
1 tax return. As of Date 3, Shareholder did not know or have reason to know that FC
was a PFIC or that he, as owner of the shares of FC, was eligible to make an election to
treat FC as a QEF. Neither Shareholder nor its advisors had, at the time, actually
received any communications from FC identifying FC as a PFIC or informing
Shareholder of his eligibility to make a QEF election.

On Date 5, Accounting Firm received an email from Investment Advisor informing it that
Investment Advisor had reason to believe that FC was a PFIC. Investment Advisor also
suggested that Shareholder consider making a QEF election with respect to FC.

Investment Advisor subsequently provided Accounting Firm with a copy of a “Notice of
U.S. Tax Information of U.S. Persons” (the “Notice”) issued by FC on Date 6. The
Notice had been mailed to Investment Advisor’s office in Country 2. It stated that FC
was a PFIC for the taxable year beginning on Date 2 and ending on Date 4 and that any
shareholder wishing to make a QEF election would be permitted to review FC’s books
and records. Investment Advisor did not receive a “Notice of U.S. Tax Information for
U.S. Persons” from FC for fiscal year ending on Date 1.
PLR-138560-12 3

Shareholder has submitted affidavits, under penalties of perjury, that describe the
events that led to his failure to make a QEF election with respect to FC by the election
due date, including the role of Accounting Firm and Investment Advisor. Shareholder
also submitted an affidavit from Accounting Firm, which describes Accounting Firm’s
engagement and responsibilities, and the advice concerning the tax treatment of FC
that it provided to Shareholder.

Shareholder represents that, as of the date of this request for ruling, the PFIC status of
FC has not been raised by the IRS on audit for any of the taxable years at issue.

RULING REQUESTED

Shareholder requests the consent of the Commissioner to make a retroactive QEF
election with respect to FC for Year 1 under Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f).

LAW

Section 1295(a) provides that a PFIC will be treated as a QEF with respect to a
shareholder if (1) an election by the shareholder under section 1295(b) applies to the
PFIC for the taxable year; and (2) the PFIC complies with the requirements prescribed
by the Secretary for purposes of determining the ordinary earnings and net capital gains
of the company.

Under section 1295(b)(2), a QEF election may be made for a taxable year at any time
on or before the due date (determined with regard to extensions) for filing the return for
the taxable year. To the extent provided in regulations, the election may be made after
the due date if the shareholder failed to make an election by the due date because the
shareholder reasonably believed the company was not a PFIC.

Under Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f), a shareholder may request the consent of the
Commissioner to make a retroactive QEF election for a taxable year if:

   1. the shareholder reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, within the
      meaning of Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f)(2);
   2. granting consent will not prejudice the interests of the United States
      government, as provided in Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f)(3);
   3. the request is made before a representative of the Internal Revenue Service
      raises upon audit the PFIC status of the company for any taxable year of the
      shareholder; and
   4. the shareholder satisfies the procedural requirements of Treas. Reg. §1.1295-
      3(f)(4).

The procedural requirements include filing a request for consent to make a retroactive
election with, and submitting a user fee to, the Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
PLR-138560-12 4

(International). Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f)(4)(i). Additionally, affidavits signed under
penalties of perjury must be submitted that describe:

   1. the events that led to the failure to make a QEF election by the election due
      date;
   2. the discovery of the failure;
   3. the engagement and responsibilities of the qualified tax professional; and
   4. the extent to which the shareholder relied on the professional.

Treas. Reg. §§1.1295-3(f)(4)(ii) and (iii).

CONCLUSION

Based on the information submitted and representations made with Shareholder’s ruling
request, we conclude that Shareholder has satisfied Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(f).
Accordingly, consent is granted to Shareholder to make a retroactive QEF election with
respect to FC for Year 1, provided that Shareholder complies with the rules under
Treas. Reg. §1.1295-3(g) regarding the time and manner for making the retroactive
QEF election.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.

This private letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section
6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter
ruling is being sent to your authorized representative.

A copy of this letter ruling must be attached to any federal income tax return to which it
is relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this
requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control
number of the letter ruling.

                                                     Sincerely,


                                                     Jeffery G. Mitchell
                                                     Branch Chief, Branch 2
                                                     International

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.