Private Letter Ruling 1314016 Released April 5, 2013 Approved

PLR 1314016: IRS grants controlled foreign corporations more time to file Form 3115

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2013
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A parent company asked for more time to file the original Form 3115 needed to change the amortization accounting method of seven controlled foreign corporations. The parent had timely filed a signed duplicate and given another copy to the examining agent, but its electronically filed consolidated return did not include the signed original. The IRS concluded that the parent acted reasonably and in good faith and that granting relief would not prejudice the government. It granted 60 calendar days from the date of the letter to file the original Form 3115 with an amended consolidated return. The ruling did not decide whether the accounting method change itself qualified under Rev. Proc. 2011-14.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Can the parent receive more time to file the original Form 3115 for its controlled foreign corporations?
  • Outcome: Approved, with a 60-day extension.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 446(e) and 957; Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3; Rev. Proc. 2011-14

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201314016 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/5/2013 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.00-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------------------------------- --------------------, ID No. --------------
---------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------ ----------------------
Refer Reply To:
------------------------------------------------------- CC:ITA:B06
PLR-133167-12
Date:
January 07, 2013

LEGEND:

Parent = -----------------------------------------------
------------------------

Foreign Corp 1 = ------------------------------------------------------

Foreign Corp 2 = ---------------------------------------------

Foreign Corp 3 = ----------------------------------------------------

Foreign Corp 4 = ---------------------------------------------------

Foreign Corp 5 = --------------------------------------------

Foreign Corp 6 = --------------------------------------------

Foreign Corp 7 = ---------------------------------------------------

A = -------

Date 1 = ---------------------------

Date 2 = --------------------

Date 3 = ----------------------------

Dear ---------------:
PLR-133167-12 2

   This ruling responds to a letter dated July 12, 2012, submitted by Parent on

behalf of seven of its controlled foreign corporations, Foreign Corp 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7
(hereinafter collectively referred to as “CFCs”). Parent requests an extension of time
pursuant to §301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file the
original copy of Form 3115, Application for Change in Accounting Method, to change
the CFCs’ accounting method for amortization for the taxable year ending Date 1.

FACTS

   Parent represents that the facts are as follows:

    Parent is the common parent of an affiliated group of corporations that files a

consolidated federal income tax return. The CFCs are controlled foreign corporations,
as defined in § 957 of the Internal Revenue Code, of Parent. On Date 2, Parent timely
filed a signed duplicate copy of a Form 3115 on behalf of the CFCs to change their
method of accounting for amortization for the taxable year ended Date 1 (the A taxable
year) under section 6.01 of the Appendix of Rev. Proc. 2011-14, 2011-4 I.R.B. 330, with
the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in Ogden, UT (Ogden copy) in accordance with
section 6.02(3) of Rev. Proc. 2011-14. Because the CFCs were under audit, Parent
also timely provided a copy of the Form 3115 to the appropriate examining agent in
accordance with section 6.02(3) of Rev. Proc. 2011-14 subsequent to obtaining the IRS
director’s consent to file the Form 3115.

   On or about Date 3, Parent timely filed the Parent group consolidated federal

income tax return for the taxable year ended Date 1 through an electronic filing.
Although the electronically filed consolidated federal income tax return reflected a
change in the CFCs’ method of accounting for amortization, Parent failed to attach the
signed original of the Form 3115 reflecting the change in the CFCs’ accounting method
for amortization with the Parent group consolidated federal income tax return for the A
taxable year as required by section by section 6.02(3) of Rev. Proc. 2011-14.

. Parent engaged an accounting firm to prepare and electronically file Parent
group consolidated federal income tax return for the A taxable year. Due to
miscommunication within the accounting firm, the accounting firm failed to file the
original Form 3115 with the electronically filed consolidated federal income tax return.
Parent did not discover that the accounting firm inadvertently failed to file the original
Form 3115 with the electronically filed consolidated federal income tax return until after
the timely filing of the consolidated federal income tax return and the signed duplicate
copy of the Form 3115.

RULING REQUESTED
PLR-133167-12 3

     Parent requests an extension of time pursuant to §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3

to file the original copy of Form 3115 on behalf of its CFCs, changing the CFCs’ method
of accounting for amortization for the taxable year ending Date 1.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

    Rev. Proc. 2011-14 provides the procedures by which a taxpayer may obtain

automatic consent to change certain methods of accounting. A taxpayer complying with
all the applicable provisions of this revenue procedure has obtained the consent of the
Commissioner of Internal Revenue to change the taxpayer’s method of accounting
under § 446(e) of the Internal Revenue Code and the Income Tax Regulations
thereunder.

     Section 6.02(3)(a) of Rev. Proc. 2011-14 provides in general that a taxpayer

changing a method of accounting pursuant to Rev. Proc. 2011-14 must complete and
file a Form 3115 in duplicate. The original must be attached to the taxpayer’s timely
filed (including extensions) original federal income tax return implementing the change
in method of accounting for the year of change, and a copy (with signature) of the Form
3115 must be filed with the IRS national office (or if applicable IRS Ogden, UT) no
earlier than the first day of the year of change and no later than when the original is filed
with the federal income tax return for the year of change.

   Section 6.02(3)(b) of Rev. Proc. 2011-14 provides that in the case of changing

the accounting method of a controlled foreign corporation as defined in § 957(a), an
original application must be attached to the designated shareholder’s (or its common
parent’s) timely filed (including extension) original federal income tax return for its
taxable year with or within which ends the year of change of the foreign corporation, and
a copy (with the original signature or a photocopy of the original signature) of the
application must be filed with the national office (or, if applicable with the IRS in Ogden,
UT) no earlier than the first day of the year of change and no later than the date the
designated shareholder (or its common parent) files the original with the designated
shareholder’s (or its common parent’s) federal income tax return for its taxable year with
or within which ends the year of change of the foreign corporation.

   Section 6.03(4) of Rev. Proc. 2011-14 provides that a taxpayer under

examination may change its method of accounting pursuant to Rev. Proc. 2011-14 if the
director consents to the filing of a request for an accounting method change. Section
6.02(3)(c) provides that if the taxpayer is under examination with respect to any income
tax issue, in all cases the taxpayer (or if section 6.02(3)(b) of Rev. Proc. 2011-14
applies, the designated shareholder) must provide an additional copy of the Form 3115
to the examining agent(s) no later than the date the taxpayer files the national office
copy of Form 3115, or if applicable, the Ogden copy, of Form 3115.
PLR-133167-12 4

   Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable

extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301-9100-3 to make a
regulatory election.

   Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the

Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an
election. Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain
elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do
not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

    Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to § 301.9100-3

will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of
the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of
relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

   Based solely on the facts and representations submitted, we conclude that the

requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Accordingly, Parent is granted 60
calendar days from the date of this letter to file the original of the Form 3115 changing
its CFCs’ method of accounting for amortization under Rev. Proc. 2011-14 with an
amended consolidated federal income tax return for the taxable year ending Date 1.

   Except as specifically set forth above, no opinion is expressed or implied

concerning the federal income tax consequences described above under any other
provisions of the Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning (i)
whether Parent and its CFCs are qualified to file the Form 3115 for the change in
method of accounting for amortization under Rev. Proc. 2011-14; (ii) whether the
change in method of accounting that is the subject of such Form 3115 qualifies under
section 6.01 of the Appendix of Rev. Proc. 2011-14; or (iii) the propriety of the CFCs’
present and proposed methods of accounting for amortization.

  The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations

submitted by Parent and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an
appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in
support for a ruling, it is subject to verification on examination.

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayers requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)

provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-133167-12 5

   In accordance with the provisions of the power of attorney on file with this office,

a copy of this letter is being sent to Parent’s authorized representatives. We are also
sending a copy of this letter to the appropriate operating division director.

                                Sincerely yours,



                                WILLIE E. ARMSTRONG, JR.
                                Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 7
                                Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                (Income Tax and Accounting)

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.