PLR 1314009: IRS grants more time to waive additional first-year depreciation
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A corporation asked for more time to elect not to claim additional first-year depreciation for certain classes of property placed in service during two taxable years. Its accounting firm had omitted the required election statements from the corporation's electronically filed consolidated returns. The IRS granted 60 calendar days to make the elections through amended consolidated returns, after concluding that the relief requirements were met and that the government would not be prejudiced. The ruling did not decide whether any particular property qualified for the depreciation deduction.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Can the corporation receive more time to elect out of additional first-year depreciation for specified property classes?
- Outcome: Approved, with a 60-day extension and amended-return requirement.
- Key authorities: IRC § 168(k); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.168(k)-1 and 301.9100-3
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201314009 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/5/2013 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.04-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------------------------- ---------------------------
-------------------------------------------------- ID No. ------------------
---------------------------------- Telephone Number:
----------------- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:7
PLR-129399-12
Date:
December 20, 2012
Re: Request for Extension of Time to Make the Election Not to Deduct the Additional
First Year Depreciation
Taxpayer = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A = -------
B = -------
C = ---------------
D = ----------------------------------------------------------------
E = ----------------------------------------------------------------
F = --------------------------------------------------------------------
G = --------------------------------
Date 1 = ---------------------------
Date 2 = ---------------------------
Date 3 = ---------------------------
Dear -----------------:
This letter responds to a letter dated July 2, 2012, requesting an extension of
time pursuant to § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to make
the election not to deduct the additional first year depreciation under § 168(k) of the
Internal Revenue Code for certain classes of qualified property placed in service by
Taxpayer in the taxable years ended Date 1 (the A taxable year), and Date 2 (the B
taxable year).
FACTS
Taxpayer represents that the facts are as follows:
Taxpayer, a corporation, is an independent local exchange carrier, providing
communication services to customers throughout the State of C. Taxpayer also
provides long distance, internet, cellular telephone, and fiber-optic based facilities
services through its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Taxpayer is a member of an affiliated
PLR-129399-12 2
group of corporations that files a consolidated federal income tax return, consisting of
Taxpayer as the common parent and three subsidiaries: D; E; and F.
Taxpayer prepares its consolidated federal income tax return each year and
submits a draft of such return, along with depreciation schedules, other supporting
schedules, and other documentation, to G, a certified public accounting firm, licensed in
the State of C. G reviews the consolidated federal income tax return and, after a final
review by Taxpayer, G electronically files Taxpayer’s consolidated federal income tax
return.
Taxpayer timely filed consolidated Forms 1120, U.S. Corporation Income Tax
Return, for the taxable year ended Date 1, and for the taxable year ended Date 2. On
each of these returns, Taxpayer did not claim the additional first year depreciation
deduction for all classes of qualified property, other than 7-year property, placed in
service by Taxpayer during the A and B taxable years. However, G inadvertently failed
to attach the election statements not to deduct the additional first year depreciation for
such property to the electronically filed consolidated federal income tax returns for the A
and B taxable years.
While the period of limitations on assessment under § 6501(a) for the taxable
year ended Date 1, expired prior to the date of this letter ruling, the Internal Revenue
Service and Taxpayer agreed to extend the period of limitations on assessment for the
taxable year ended Date 1, until Date 3.
RULING REQUESTED
Taxpayer requests an extension of time pursuant to § 301.9100-3 of the
Procedure and Administration Regulations to make the election not to deduct the
additional first year depreciation under § 168(k) for all classes of qualified property,
other than 7-year property, placed in service by Taxpayer in the taxable years ended
Date 1 and Date 2.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 168(k)(1), as amended by § 103 of the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008,
Pub. L. No. 110-185, 122 Stat. 613 (February 13, 2008), and by § 1201(a)(1) of the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Tax Act of 2009, Div. B of Pub. L. No. 111-5,
123 Stat. 115 (February 17, 2009), allows a 50-percent additional first year depreciation
deduction for qualified property acquired by a taxpayer after December 31, 2007, and
placed in service by the taxpayer before January 1, 2010 (before January 1, 2011, in
the case of qualified property described in § 168(k)(2)(B) or (C)).
Section 168(k)(2)(D)(iii) provides that a taxpayer may elect not to deduct the 50-
percent additional first year depreciation for any class of property placed in service
PLR-129399-12 3
during the taxable year. The term “class of property” is defined in § 1.168(k)-1(e)(2) of
the Income Tax Regulations as meaning, in general, each class of property described in
§ 168(e) (for example, 5-year property). See section 5.01 of Rev. Proc. 2008-54, 2008-
38 I.R.B. 722 (stating rules similar to rules in § 1.168(k)-1 for “qualified property” or for
“30-percent additional first year depreciation deduction” apply for purposes of § 168(k)
as currently in effect).
Section 1.168(k)-1(e)(3)(i) provides that the election not to deduct additional first
year depreciation must be made by the due date (including extensions) of the federal
tax return for the taxable year in which the property is placed in service by the taxpayer.
Section 1.168(k)-1(e)(3)(ii) provides that the election not to deduct additional first
year depreciation must be made in the manner prescribed on Form 4562, “Depreciation
and Amortization,” and its instructions. The instructions to Form 4562 for the taxable
years ended Date 1, and Date 2, provided that the election not to deduct the additional
first year depreciation is made by attaching a statement to the taxpayer’s timely filed tax
return indicating that the taxpayer is electing not to deduct the additional first year
depreciation and the class of property for which the taxpayer is making the election.
Under § 301.9100-1, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue has discretion to
grant a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in '' 301.9100-2 and
301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election.
Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the
Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an
election. Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain
elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do
not meet the requirements of ' 301.9100-2.
Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief under ' 301.9100-3 will
be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of
relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.
Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) provides, in part, that the interests of the government
are ordinarily prejudiced if the taxable year in which the regulatory election should have
been made, or any taxable years that would have been affected by the election had it
been timely made, are closed by the period of limitations on assessment under
§ 6501(a) before the taxpayer's receipt of a ruling granting § 301.9100-3 relief.
CONCLUSIONS
Based solely on the facts and representations submitted, we conclude that the
requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Accordingly,
PLR-129399-12 4
Taxpayer is granted 60 calendar days from the date of this letter to make the election
not to deduct the additional first year depreciation under § 168(k) for all classes of
property, other than 7-year property, placed in service by Taxpayer during the taxable
years ended Date 1, and Date 2, that qualify for the additional first year depreciation.
Taxpayer must make this election by filing an amended consolidated federal income tax
return for each such taxable year, with a statement indicating that Taxpayer is electing
not to deduct the additional first year depreciation for all classes of property, other than
7-year property, placed in service by Taxpayer during that taxable year.
Except as specifically set forth above, we express no opinion concerning the
federal income tax consequences of the facts described above under any other
provisions of the Code. Specifically, no opinion is expressed or implied on whether any
item of depreciable property placed in service by Taxpayer during the taxable years
ended Date 1, and Date 2, is eligible for the additional first year depreciation deduction.
In accordance with the power of attorney, we are sending copies of this letter to
Taxpayer’s authorized representatives. We are also sending a copy of this letter to the
appropriate operating division director.
This letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Sincerely,
Kathleen Reed
Kathleen Reed
Branch Chief, Branch 7
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Income Tax and Accounting)
Enclosures (2):
copy of this letter
copy for section 6110 purposes
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2013, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.