PLR 201314004: IRS treats canceled partner notes as a cash distribution

Number
201314004
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Extent of Recognition of Gain or Loss on Distribution
Topics
Code sections
§ 731, § 707, § 751, § 6110
Ruling dated
December 20, 2012
Publicly released
April 5, 2013

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2013
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A partnership made loans to one of its partners and documented them with notes. The partnership planned to cancel some of those notes and make a pro rata distribution to another partner to prevent dilution. The IRS ruled that canceling the notes would be treated as a distribution of money to the borrowing partner for purposes of section 731. The IRS did not rule on whether the arrangements were bona fide loans or on other provisions that could apply to the transaction.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Is canceling the partner's notes treated as a cash distribution under section 731?
  • Outcome: Approved, subject to the stated facts and representations.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 731, 707, 751, and 6110; Treas. Reg. § 1.731-1(c)(2)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201314004
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/5/2013
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 731.00-00
Person To Contact:
----------------
----------------------------, ID No. --------------
------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------
Telephone Number:
----------------------------------
----------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B01
PLR-127913-12
Date:
December 20, 2012

LEGEND

X = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------

State = --------------

Parter A = ---------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------

Partner B = --------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------

$a = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-

Dear -----------------:
PLR-127913-12
2

This responds to a letter dated June 28, 2012, and subsequent correspondence, submitted on behalf of X, requesting a ruling under section 731 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Facts

According to the information submitted, X is a limited liability company formed under the laws of State that is treated as a partnership for federal tax purposes. The partners of X are Partner A and Partner B.

During the time that Partner A has been a partner of X, X made several loans of money to Partner A. The loans were evidenced by notes from Partner A. X now intends to cancel certain notes from Partner A. Concurrently with the cancellation, X will make a pro rata distribution to Partner B to prevent dilution. After the cancellations and distribution, X will continue in existence with Partner A and Partner B remaining partners.

X requests a ruling that, for purposes of determining gain under section 731, X’s cancellation of the notes from Partner A will be treated as a distribution of money from X to Partner A.

Law and Analysis

Section 731(a)(1) provides that, in the case of a distribution by a partnership to a partner, gain shall not be recognized to such partner, except to the extent that any money distributed exceeds the adjusted basis of such partner's interest in the partnership immediately before the distribution.

Section 1.731-1(c)(2) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that the receipt by a partner from the partnership of money or property under an obligation to repay the amount of such money or to return such property does not constitute a distribution subject to section 731 but is a loan governed by section 707(a). To the extent that such an obligation is canceled, the obligor partner will be considered to have received a distribution of money or property at the time of cancellation.

Conclusion

Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that, pursuant to Treas. Reg. § 1.731-1(c)(2), X’s cancellation of the notes from Partner A will be treated as a distribution of $a from X to Partner A.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
PLR-127913-12
3

referenced in this letter. Specifically, no opinion is expressed concerning whether the arrangements between X and Partner A constitute bona fide loans, or whether sections 707(a)(2) or 751 apply to X’s cancellation of the notes from Partner A or the distributions made by X to Partner B.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to the power of attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter will be sent to X’s authorized representative.

Sincerely,

David R. Haglund
David R. Haglund
Chief, Branch 1
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)

Copy of this letter
Copy of this letter for § 6110 purposes

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace