PLR 201311014: IRS grants extra time to make a PFIC mark-to-market election
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2013, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The IRS granted a corporate taxpayer's U.S. subsidiary an additional 60 days to make a mark-to-market election for stock in a passive foreign investment company. The subsidiary had not received the information needed to prepare Form 8621 by the return deadline, and its employees later mistakenly believed another firm was responsible for filing the form. The IRS concluded that the taxpayer met the rules for a reasonable extension because the late election would not lower or otherwise change the taxpayer's overall tax liability. The ruling grants more time, but it does not decide whether the subsidiary otherwise qualifies to make the election.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May the U.S. subsidiary receive extra time to make a mark-to-market election under IRC § 1296?
- Outcome: approved.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 1296, 1297, 6501, 6662, 6110; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1296-1(h), 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3.
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201311014
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 3/15/2013
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1296.00-00
Person To Contact:
---------------------
-------------------------, ID No. -----------------
--------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------
--------------------
Telephone Number:
-------------------------------
----------------------
-------------
Refer Reply To:
---------------------------------
CC:INTL:B02
PLR-135536-12
Date:
December 03, 2012
LEGEND:
Taxpayer = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
U.S. Person = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
PFIC = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------
Date 1 = --------------------------
Year 2 = -------
Year 4 = -------
State A = ---------------
Firm B = --------------------------------------------------------------
Dear ---------------:
This in response to a letter received by our office on August 15, 2012, submitted by U.S. Person, requesting an extension of time under §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to make a mark to market election under section 1296 of the Internal Revenue Code with respect to its investment in PFIC.
The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in
\fPLR-135536-12
2
support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data submitted may be required as part of the audit process.
FACTS
Taxpayer is the common parent of an affiliated group of corporations that files a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. U.S. Person was incorporated on Date 1 under the laws of State A and is a member of Taxpayer’s consolidated group. U.S. Person’s activities consist of investment banking, securities and commodities trading, capital raising, asset management, advisory, research, brokerage and other financial services to its customers. It also executes proprietary trading strategies on its own behalf, including offshore marketable securities of passive foreign investment companies within the meaning of section 1297(a). During Year 2, U.S. Person purchased securities of PFIC.
Firm B was responsible for providing the information to U.S. Person necessary to make a mark to market election with respect to PFIC. The information for Year 2 was not provided to U.S. Person until Year 4. Consequently, U.S. Person lacked the information to timely file Form 8621 and to make a mark to market election with respect to its investment in PFIC. After receiving this information, employees of U.S. Person responsible for preparing the tax return for Year 2 erroneously assumed that Firm B was required to file the Form 8621 and provide copies to U.S. Person. As a result, no Forms 8621 were prepared with respect to U.S. Person’s investment in PFIC. Therefore, no election under section 1296 to mark to market the securities of PFIC was timely filed.
An employee of Taxpayer in reviewing the tax return and compliance discovered that PFIC was a passive foreign investment company within the meaning of section 1297(a) and that the information to prepare and timely file the Form 8621 and to make the mark to market election had not been received before the tax return due date for the tax year Year 2 and subsequent years. Therefore, the Year 2 and subsequent years’ federal income tax returns did not include any Forms 8621.
U.S. Person represents that:
1. As of the submission date of its request for relief, U.S. Person had not been notified (a) of any action taken by the IRS with respect to the election, (b) that the IRS had discovered its failure to properly make the regulatory election, or (c) that the treatment of affected items on the returns filed by U.S. Person was incorrect.
2. Government interests will not be prejudiced by virtue of granting relief for U.S. Person to file the election because the late election will not result in a lower, or different, tax liability.
\fPLR-135536-12
3
LAW
Section 1296(a) provides that, in the case of marketable stock in a passive foreign investment company that is owned (or treated as owned under section 1296(g)) by a United States person at the close of any taxable year, the United States person may elect to include in gross income the excess of the fair market value of the stock over its adjusted basis.
Treas. Reg. § 1.1296-1(h) provides that an election under section 1296 for a taxable year must be made on or before the due date (including extensions) of the person’s U.S. income tax return for that year.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has the discretion to grant a taxpayer a reasonable extension of time, under the rules set forth in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3, to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(b) provides that an election includes an application for relief in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation, revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in Treas. Reg.
§301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(b)(1) provides that, except as provided in Treas. Reg.
§ 301.9100-3(b)(3), a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer
(i) requests relief before the failure to make the regulatory election is discovered by the IRS;
(ii) failed to make the election because of intervening events beyond the taxpayer’s control;
(iii) failed to make the election because, after exercising reasonable diligence (taking into account the taxpayer’s experience and the complexity of the return or issue), the taxpayer was unaware of the necessity for the election;
(iv) reasonably relied on the written advice of the IRS; or
(v) reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.
\fPLR-135536-12
4
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(b)(3) provides that a taxpayer is deemed not to have acted reasonably or in good faith if the taxpayer
(i) seeks to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty has been or could be imposed under section 6662 at the time the taxpayer requests relief (taking into account any qualified amended return filed within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 1.6664-2(c)(3)) and the new position requires or permits a regulatory election for which relief is requested;
(ii) was informed in all material respects of the required election and related tax consequences but chose not to file the election; or
(iii) uses hindsight in requesting relief.
Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i) provides, in part, that the interests of the Government are prejudiced if granting relief would result in the taxpayer having a lower tax liability in the aggregate for all taxable years affected by the election than the taxpayer would have had if the election had been timely made (taking into account the time value of money). Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) provides, in part, that the interests of the Government are ordinarily prejudiced if the taxable year in which the regulatory election should have been made is closed, or any taxable years that would have been affected by the election had it been timely made are closed, by the period of limitations on assessment under section 6501(a) before the taxpayer’s receipt of a ruling granting relief.
CONCLUSION
Based on the information and representations submitted, we conclude that U.S.
Person satisfies the requirements for a reasonable extension of time to make the mark to market election under section 1296 of the Code. Accordingly, U.S. Person is granted an extension of time of 60 days from the date of this letter to make the election under section 1296 with respect to the stock of PFIC for Year 2 and subsequent years.
The granting of an extension of time is not a determination that U.S. Person is otherwise eligible to make the election under section 1296. Treas. Reg. § 301.9100- 1(a).
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
Sincerely,
\fPLR-135536-12 5
Jeffery G. Mitchell
Branch Chief, Branch 2
(International)
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace